This and the previous point about speaking fluent internet are really compelling and speak to an…

This and the previous point about speaking fluent internet are really compelling and speak to an…

Play all audios:


This and the previous point about speaking fluent internet are really compelling and speak to an occurrence worth parsing out in greater detail: that the Trump campaign was excellent at


mobilizing and empowering online users with a basic message that was easily iterate on, however, they were not necessarily the better campaign at utilizing the


internet-as-communications-infrastructure in the traditional sense (a la OFA). Which begs an examination of what types of messages mobilize users/can be iterated on, to what extent is a


campaign willing to relinquish message control, and whether or not the traditional approach of pushing out a message through normal content types is even really worthwhile if it can’t


mobilize as effectively