Reader TTS

A pacemaker-like device implanted in the frontal lobes of the brain may slow the progression of some Alzheimer's disease symptoms, a new study says. The treatment, known as deep brain

stimulation (DBS), in which implants send electrical signals to regulate the firing of brain cells, has long been used in the frontal lobes (the brain’s motor control area) to successfully

inhibit the tremors that can occur with Parkinson’s disease. But the Ohio State University study, published this week in the _Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease,_ marks the first time an

Alzheimer’s study has tested DBS in the brain’s frontal lobes — the area where problem-solving, organization and other executive-function skills are processed. Researchers at Ohio State

followed three Alzheimer’s patients who had the devices implanted for about two years. They compared their abilities with those of people who did not have DBS and found that two of their

three subjects had statistically less decline than those with no DBS. One woman in the DBS group even regained some daily functioning abilities. She was able to do a few things she had

stopped doing, including preparing dinner for herself and her husband and planning an activity outside the home.  Tom Moore takes care of his wife, LaVonne, who has Alzheimer’s disease. A

new study shows that an implanted pacemaker that sends electrical stimulation to LaVonne’s brain slowed the progression of her symptoms, allowing her to retain functionality longer. Courtesy

of The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center “These things may not seem like a lot, but if you’ve ever been a caregiver, you know it’s fabulous if [your loved one] can start thinking on their

own a little bit better,” says Douglas Scharre, coauthor of the study and director of the division of cognitive neurology at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center's

Neurological Institute.  Scharre adds that the point of the small study was first to see if DBS in the frontal lobes was safe for Alzheimer’s patients and then to determine whether its

effect was promising enough to warrant further study. Now, he says, researchers have an optimistic yes in answer to both questions. Previous work with DBS and Alzheimer’s led by the

University of Toronto and Johns Hopkins Medicine focused on stimulating memory circuits. “We saw slower decline in some individuals,” notes Gwenn Smith, a neuropsychologist at Johns Hopkins

and a coauthor of the study, but she says that an increase in brain metabolism over one year was observed. Because metabolism is associated with the health of brain cells — as Alzheimer’s

progresses brain metabolism typically decreases, in contrast to the effects of DBS — she’s enthusiastic that DBS has the potential to treat the disease. Smith is also encouraged by the Ohio

State study’s preliminary results. They not only offer more evidence that DBS is safe for further testing in Alzheimer’s patients, she says, but “it’s exciting to see studies of a different

brain circuit that may have effects on Alzheimer’s symptoms."