
Piers morgan brands prince harry a 'whiny brat' in furious rant
- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN
Play all audios:

Piers Morgan, 56, has hit out at Prince Harry, 36, following his comments about his financial concerns while speaking to Oprah Winfrey alongside his wife Meghan Markle, 39. The former Good
Morning Britain host unleashed a furious rant aimed at the Duke of Sussex when he joined Tucker Carlson on FOX News to discuss the royal couple and his exit from the ITV show this evening.
Piers began by praising Harry for serving the Army for 10 years, but then questioned “what has happened” to him since his courageous efforts. He fumed to host Tucker: “But what's
happened to that guy? “He's turned into a whiny brat. “He's in his mid-30s crying his dad won't fund him financially.” READ MORE... LORRAINE KELLY REACTS AFTER CAT
DEELEY'S DEBUT SPARKS DIVIDE Meanwhile, Meghan had accumulated several million pounds from her successful TV career on Suits. The couple have also signed a lucrative deal with Netflix
believed to be worth around £100million and with Spotify, worth around £30million. They now own a mansion in Montecito, California, worth around £11.4million. Elsewhere in Piers’ new
interview, he discussed Ofcom receiving a record-breaking number of complaints before ITV bosses held discussions with him about disbelieving Meghan in an on-air rant. The outspoken
journalist’s comments denying Meghan’s mental health struggles also caused controversy before he quit the show. Piers explained to Tucker: "I was hired by ITV to do the morning show
because they were struggling with the ratings, they wanted me to shake things up… I was a highly opinionated person and they knew that. "Over five years we trebled the ratings and the
last day ironically was the first day we beat the BBC. "Instead I was corralled into a position that ‘You've got to apologise… or your position is untenable.'"