Reader TTS

* UK Visas and Immigration Guidance VISA MATCHES: HANDLING ASYLUM CLAIMS FROM VISA APPLICANTS (ACCESSIBLE VERSION) Updated 30 April 2025 CONTENTS * About this guidance * Introduction * Visa

application information sources * Asylum screening and routing * Competing identities at asylum screening * Asylum support * Asylum casework * Additional staff support: visa match scenarios

Print this page © Crown copyright 2025 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit

nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected].

Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/visa-matches-handling-asylum-claims-from-uk-visa-applicants-instruction/visa-matches-handling-asylum-claims-from-visa-applicants Version 15.0 ABOUT

THIS GUIDANCE This guidance explains how asylum officers and other relevant Home Office officials can identify whether asylum claimants have previously applied for a visa to come to the UK

or Ireland. It also explains how officials can obtain information relating to the earlier visa application, and how it may be useful in making an asylum decision. CONTACTS If you have any

questions about the guidance and your line manager or senior caseworker cannot help you or you think that the guidance has factual errors then email the Asylum Policy team. If you notice any

formatting errors in this guidance (broken links, spelling mistakes and so on) or have any comments about the layout or navigability of the guidance then you can email the Guidance Review,

Atlas and Forms team. PUBLICATION Below is information on when this version of the guidance was published: * version 15.0 * published for Home Office staff on 29 April 2025 CHANGES FROM LAST

VERSION OF THIS GUIDANCE * new Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) section INTRODUCTION AUDIENCE AND PURPOSE This instruction is for all staff responsible for screening, deciding and

managing asylum claims (including those making decisions on asylum support applications). It provides guidance on the handling and consideration of asylum claims from those who have applied

for visas to travel to the United Kingdom or Ireland. For the purposes of this guidance the term ‘officers’ applies to asylum decision makers, screening officers and border force staff.

BACKGROUND Robust and reliable identity management is an important part of securing the UK’s border. The biographical and biometric visa system supports this. In 2003, the UK began taking

fingerprints as part of the visa application process. By 2008, all visa applicants aged 5 or over were fingerprinted (except for those persons officially exempted). Since December 2015,

certain Irish visa applications made abroad have also been identifiable in the UK through biometric records. All asylum claimants in the UK (and their dependants) aged 5 or over have their

fingerprints automatically checked against visa fingerprint records, which are usually retained for a period of 10 years. Detailed evidence about visa applications is available through Home

Office systems, and may assist considerations on support eligibility, age assessment, the substantive asylum decision and redocumentation and removal. Visa evidence may also help to identify

criminality. ADDITIONAL READING Officers must apply all other relevant guidance, including (but not limited to): * Assessing credibility and refugee status * Asylum interviews *

Nationality: disputed, unknown and other cases * Assessing age * Inadmissibility: safe third country cases * Biometric data-sharing process * Biometric information: enrolment APPLICATION FOR

CHILDREN AND THOSE WITH CHILDREN Section 55 of the Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009 places a duty on the Secretary of State to make arrangements for ensuring that immigration,

asylum, nationality and customs functions are discharged having regard to the need to safeguard and promote the welfare of children in the UK. It does not impose any new functions or

override existing functions. Officers must not apply the actions set out in this instruction either to children or to those with children without having due regard to the statutory guidance

on Section 55, Every child matters: change for children, which sets out the key principles to consider in all Home Office activities involving children. Our statutory duty to children

includes the need to demonstrate: * fair treatment which meets the same standard a British child would receive * the child’s interests being made a primary, although not the only,

consideration * no discrimination of any kind * that asylum applications are dealt with in a timely fashion * identification of those that might be at risk from harm See in particular: *

Children’s asylum claims * Assessing age VISA APPLICATION INFORMATION SOURCES UK VISAS When a person applies for a UK visa, their biometrics are taken and key information about the

application is recorded and retained. All visa applications made since 1998 are accessible to officers through the secure Central Reference System (CRS). Some applicants are exempt from

having to provide fingerprint biometrics for visa applications, for example children under the age of 5, and diplomats. Some applicants are incapable of giving fingerprint biometrics.

Guidance is available at Biometric information: enrolment. CRS will usually contain the detailed Visa Application Form (VAF). Other supporting documents, including those submitted as part of

a visa application (for instance, bank statements, employment letters and national identity cards) may also exist on CRS. If an asylum claimant is biometrically matched to an earlier visa

application, this will be identifiable on Atlas to screening officers through fingerprint match results. They will then, as far as possible, use CRS to promptly obtain further information

about the person and their visa application, to inform asylum screening and subsequent actions. Officers will then be able to identify that a visa match exists and will also be able to

directly obtain or request further information from CRS, to inform their asylum interviews and decisions. Such information may also be valuable to asylum support caseworkers. For

non-biometrically matched cases where a visa application history is known or suspected, CRS must be searched using information such as biographic details and travel documents. If reliable

information is not held, searches on aliases, variant spellings, dependants’ details, date ranges and wildcards may help to identify a match. The following information may be available in a

CRS record: * personal details and photograph of the visa applicant * type of visa applied for * scanned image of the biodata page of the visa applicant’s passport or other travel document *

the visa applicant’s passport number and issuing location * sponsor details * Q&A interview notes or refusal notices associated with the application * For older cases only, information

about an Electronic Visa Waiver (EVW) application * VAFs (for some visa applications before 2008 and most since) * Biometrics and biographic check results made at the time of the visa

application ACCESS AND USE OF CRS CRS may be accessed by any officer with a business need. They should obtain ‘Enhanced user’ level access, which enables documents to be printed. Officers

requiring access to CRS should consult their local CRS supervisor. If they are unclear who their supervisor is or one needs to be nominated, they should contact their senior caseworker. The

CRS user guide sets out security and handling requirements which must be applied by all users of the system, as well as guidance on how best to use CRS. This guide is stored within CRS

itself and is accessed through the Main Menu via the CRS Documentation link. Official – sensitive: start of section The information on this page has been removed as it is restricted for

internal Home Office use. Official – sensitive: end of section BIOMETRIC DATA-SHARING PROCESS If the UK visa evidence suggests that the person may have also applied for entry clearance to

the United States, Australia or New Zealand, officers should consider if requesting checks with these countries to obtain further information is appropriate. See Biometric data-sharing

process (Migration 5 biometric data-sharing process). ASYLUM SCREENING AND ROUTING After a claimant has been fingerprinted, screening officers must undertake basic checks to identify visa

matches, which will inform screening questions and help to prepare the case for routing and asylum decision-making. The actions below are focused on visa match issues at screening – not all

screening activities are listed. Officers must ensure that screening always complies with the full requirements set out in the instruction Screening and routing. VISA MATCH IDENTIFICATION

AND DOCUMENTS Actions: * if a biometric visa match cannot be identified from Atlas results, conduct manual CRS searches to check for a non-biometric visa (use a reporting date of 01/01/1998

to search all records, if no reliable search information is held) * if any UK visa match is identified, record the Visa Application Form (VAF) number as a reference number on Atlas by

selecting ‘Add reference number’ and the option ‘Visa Application Form Reference’: once satisfied that the reference number is correct press ‘complete’ Official – sensitive: start of section

The information on this page has been removed as it is restricted for internal Home Office use. Official – sensitive: end of section COMPETING IDENTITIES AT ASYLUM SCREENING If the key

identity information provided by the claimant when registering their asylum claim differs from that submitted as part of an earlier visa application, officers must proceed according to

‘Competing identities’ in the instruction Nationality: disputed, unknown and other cases; see also Assessing age. INADMISSIBILITY Visa match information may disclose evidence that an asylum

claimant has spent time in or has a connection to another safe third country (for instance, if the visa application was made in a country other than the person’s country of origin, or if

employment documents submitted as part of the application relate to a third country). If visa match information suggests that the person may have a connection to a safe third country, the

officer must ensure this is clearly noted before routing, as the case may be suitable for inadmissibility action (which would mean that the UK would not substantively consider the asylum

claim). See Inadmissibility: safe third country cases for further information about the detailed considerations applicable in such cases. ROUTING After all required actions above have been

completed and the claimant has been fully screened, if asylum support accommodation is required the officer must arrange for the case to be routed by the National Asylum Allocation Unit

(NAAU), according to the instruction Asylum screening and routing. ASYLUM SUPPORT Official – sensitive: start of section The information on this page has been removed as it is restricted for

internal Home Office use. Official – sensitive: end of section ASYLUM CASEWORK CASE RECEIPT AND INITIAL ACTIONS Before interviewing a claimant and deciding a case, officers must carefully

check Atlas for evidence that the actions and preparatory work in the section Asylum screening and routing have been completed. If the claimant has not been fingerprinted or screened, or if

there are actions outstanding from the section Fingerprint results, officers must contact the responsible screening unit to arrange for all remaining actions to be completed. If it appears

that there are actions outstanding from the sections Visa match identification or Obtain the VAF, request other evidence, notify the claim, caseworkers must complete them. Officers must also

check Atlas and CRS, to establish whether any additional information has been requested and received since the screening interview (or to request it if this has not already been done).

Before substantively considering a case, officers must also review the facts presented, to establish whether inadmissibility action is appropriate. For further information see:

Inadmissibility: safe third country cases. ASYLUM INTERVIEWS All asylum interviews, including those that may address issues involving visa matches, must be carried out in line with the

instruction Asylum interviews. Officers must prepare for and tailor the asylum interview according to what is known about the person and their claim. It is recommended that questions about

the visa match be asked after the full facts of the case have been ascertained. However, what is appropriate will be determined by the particular facts in the case. Officers must explore all

apparent discrepancies and credibility issues suggested by visa evidence. In particular, any differences between the reasons stated by a person in their visa application for coming to the

UK and the circumstances of their asylum claim must be considered. Attention must also be paid to the place and timing of the visa application and the wider evidence submitted, and the

implications such evidence may have for the asylum claim. Claimants must be given the opportunity to explain any inconsistencies that remain. For suggested areas of questioning and

consideration see: Visa match scenarios for suggested areas of questioning and consideration. Official – sensitive: start of section The information on this page has been removed as it is

restricted for internal Home Office use. Official – sensitive: end of section ADDITIONAL STAFF SUPPORT: VISA MATCH SCENARIOS All claimants, including those with visa match evidence, must

have their cases considered on a case-by-case basis, taking all evidence in the round, considering credibility in line with the published instruction Assessing credibility and refugee status

taking care to properly evaluate the future fear of harm. Attention must be paid to the nature of matches, and the claimant must be given the opportunity to explain them. Careful

questioning during the asylum interview will therefore be necessary. The matches may be significant in some cases, but in others they may be of no relevance, have an explanation, or have

discrepancies arising simply because of innocent mistakes. EXAMPLES VISA APPLICATION IDENTITY MATCHES ASYLUM APPLICATION IDENTITY, INCLUDING NATIONALITY In the absence of evidence to the

contrary, this will confirm the claimant’s identity, including nationality, and whereabouts at the time of the visa application (but of itself, nothing further). VISA APPLICATION IDENTITY

MATCHES ASYLUM APPLICATION IDENTITY, AND CLAIMANT CLAIMS TO BE A REFUGEE-SUR-PLACE The claimant may claim to have applied for the visa and have left their country and arrived in the UK in

line with the conditions on their visa, without intending to claim asylum, and to have claimed asylum only when personal or country circumstances have changed. The visa information will need

to be scrutinised, overall credibility established, and future fear examined. VISA APPLICATION IDENTITY MATCHES ASYLUM APPLICATION IDENTITY, EXCEPT FOR SHOWING A DIFFERENT NATIONALITY The

claimant may have dual nationality, and so the discrepancy may be partly accounted for. However, removal to the second country should be explored. There may also be credibility conclusions

in respect of any failure to disclose such key information. See the instruction Assessing credibility and refugee status. VISA APPLICATION IDENTITY PARTLY OR WHOLLY DIFFERENT FROM ASYLUM

APPLICATION IDENTITY (INCLUDING AGE) As the passport and possibly the claimant will have been seen as part of the visa application process, the visa identity may be more reliable. However,

all evidence and explanations presented must be taken into account, and a view taken on identity in line with the Assessing credibility and refugee status instruction. VISA APPLICATION

POST-DATES ASYLUM APPLICATION This will show that the claimant has likely left the UK since lodging their claim. If they have returned to the country of claimed persecution, this may

demonstrate safety, and credibility conclusions may also arise. It will also be significant if the claimant is not forthcoming about returning to their country of origin and does not

volunteer information regarding harm during that period of return. The visa may indicate that the claimant has departed the UK, which will have the effect of withdrawing the earlier asylum

application. See the instructions for: * Withdrawing asylum claims * Further submissions. VISA APPLICATION TRANSACTIONS (SUBMISSION DATE, INTERVIEW DATE AND SIMILAR INFORMATION) CLEARLY SHOW

CLAIMANT TO HAVE POSSESSED A NATIONAL PASSPORT AND SUGGEST THEY WERE FREELY MOVING IN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN If at a time the claimant claims to have feared the authorities; to have been in

hiding; or to have been detained or imprisoned, credibility conclusions may arise. See Assessing credibility and refugee status. THE GRANT OF A VISA MAY SHOW THAT AN ASYLUM APPLICANT HAD THE

MEANS TO LEAVE THEIR COUNTRY EARLIER THAN THEY DID Conclusions as to credibility may arise from the delay to departure. Conclusions may also arise as to the level of interest or threat by

alleged persecutors. See Assessing credibility and refugee status. VISA APPLICATION MAY SHOW CLAIMANT TO HAVE LIVED IN A SAFE PART OF THE COUNTRY OF ORIGIN This may cast doubt on substantive

aspects of the claimant’s claim, for instance, to have become involved in problems affecting a particular area. It may also indicate that it is reasonable for the claimant to return to

their address. See the Assessing credibility and refugee status. VISA APPLICATIONS MAY CONTAIN CONSIDERABLE DETAIL AND STATEMENTS AS TO THE BASIS FOR THE VISA APPLICATION (FOR EXAMPLE,

STUDY, TOURISM, AND OTHER VISA TYPES), BUT NOT ADDRESSING A FEAR OF PERSECUTION Conclusions may be drawn regarding a seemingly planned and well-ordered departure not demonstrating the

urgency of fleeing, and a willingness to travel using a genuine passport in their own name. In doing so, consideration must be also given to whether the claim is ‘sur place’. A sur place

claim is for protection based on a change in circumstances or activities of the claimant after leaving their home country and arriving in the UK. Conclusions may also be drawn about the

claimant’s previous willingness to deceive a UK government official, if the reasons for the visa appear false, and if persecution was not mentioned. See the Assessing credibility and refugee

status instruction. OTHER EVIDENCE MAY SHOW THE CLAIMANT TO HAVE ENTERED THE UK IN THE VISA APPLICATION IDENTITY, POSSIBLY IN CONTRADICTION OF STATEMENTS GIVEN IN THE ASYLUM APPLICATION AS

TO TIME, METHOD AND PLACE OF ENTRY TO THE UK, AND PROMPTNESS OF ASYLUM APPLICATION Such contradictions may – depending upon the facts of the case and any explanations given – be material to

the asylum application. See Assessing credibility and refugee status. There may also be conclusions to be drawn in respect of the claimant’s status, and of possible verbal deception. VISA

APPLICATION GIVES DETAILS OF PARENTS OR FAMILY MEMBERS This may provide information not otherwise known about the support and reception arrangements in the country of origin which may be

available claimants, particularly for unaccompanied asylum-seeking children (UASC) or vulnerable females, to be used in making a substantive decision on a case, and possibly in tracing the

family members. VISA APPLICATION SHOWS BANK STATEMENTS, ASSETS, OTHER FINANCIAL DETAILS, EMPLOYMENT RECORDS, OR SIMILAR DOCUMENTS This may affect the individual’s credibility and / or their

eligibility for support payments. VISA APPLICATION MADE, BUT CLAIMANT DENIES SUCH EVIDENCE IN INTERVIEW, UNTIL CONFRONTED WITH THE EVIDENCE This may, of itself, give rise to conclusions that

the claimant’s evidence cannot be trusted. Such a conclusion would have to be made taking the wider evidence into account, in line with guidance on credibility in Assessing credibility and

refugee status instruction. VISA APPLICATION MADE IN ANOTHER SAFE COUNTRY (FOR INSTANCE AUSTRALIA, CANADA, NEW ZEALAND, US, CANADA, EU, NORWAY, ICELAND OR SWITZERLAND) Depending upon the

circumstances of the person’s stay, the other country may be responsible for considering the case and should be referred to the Third Country Unit (see Inadmissibility: safe third country

cases). VAF INFORMATION WILL INCLUDE COPIES OF PASSPORT NUMBERS (AND SCANNED COPIES OF THE PASSPORT FOR MORE RECENT RECORDS) This may assist in redocumenting the claimant for removal. VISA

MATCH MAY SHOW THAT THE CLAIMANT IS KNOWN TO US IN A DIFFERENT IDENTITY THAN THE ONE THEY HAVE PRESENTED ON THEIR ASYLUM CLAIM Atlas and the Police National Computer (PNC) should be checked

to see if the claimant is known in the visa identity. Official - sensitive: start of section The information on this page has been removed as it is restricted for internal Home Office use.

Official - sensitive: end of section Back to top