Reader TTS

There are probably few things anyone wants to do less right now than think back to 2020. The year of the COVID-19 lockdowns, mass death, racial upheaval — on top of the ugliest presidential

election in memory. Yet I found myself turning back the clock to Sept. 29, 2020, to that highly anticipated first debate between Joe Biden and Donald Trump. The lead-up had focused on

whether a debate was even safe with the pandemic still in full swing — and some Biden supporters begged him to stay as far away as possible from the resident of that super-spreader White

House. I remember the debate as being ugly. But watching it again this week, it was also painful and kind of embarrassing. Some choice lines for the history books: “Keep yapping, man.” “Will

you shut up, man?” “It’s hard to get any word in with this clown.” “You graduated either the lowest or almost the lowest in your class.” “Don’t ever use the word ‘smart’ with me … there’s

nothing smart about you, Joe.” The pundits were quick with pronouncements. The general consensus was that Trump was unhinged and Biden did fine. Trump “bullied, bulldozed and obfuscated”

(CNN), talked “incoherently” and other times rattled off “unfounded and baseless attacks” (NBC), spewed “misleading claims and outright lies” (New York Times), and showed he had “nothing but

contempt for the values and norms that are essential to democracy” (Washington Post). Even the Wall Street Journal’s right-wing editorial page found little to like about Trump: “The

president bounced from subject to subject so frequently that it was hard to figure out what he hoped to say beyond that Joe Biden is controlled by the Democratic left. Even when moderator

Chris Wallace asked a question that played to the strengths of his record — such as on the economy — Mr. Trump couldn’t stick to the theme without leaping to attack Mr. Biden.” Yes, Fox News

ran to Trump’s defense, but it was clear they were doing damage control. But how much impact did the debate really have? Well, there was a lot of debate about that. Trump was already

trailing in the polls. Polls taken after the debate showed most voters thought Biden had won. Yet a fivethirtyeight.com analysis suggested the debate really did not change all that many

minds. But post-debate polls showed something else. America was _disgusted_. A CBS survey said respondents “overwhelmingly called the debate’s tone negative, and most said they felt annoyed

watching it.” A Politico poll found that “more than half of those who watched said they did not enjoy the 90 minutes of prime-time programming.” I could not stop thinking about these reviews

as we “look forward” to the upcoming rematch. It’s been less than four years ago, but feels like much longer. Before Jan. 6. Before much of the Republican Party decided shocking lies about

a “stolen” election must be its North Star. Before even mildly criticizing Trump was career suicide for anyone with an “R” next to their name. Before some of bold-face America’s business

titans — who used to crave control and stability at all costs — got “Trump curious.” Before high consumer prices and rising interest rates battered pocketbooks and soured the national mood

even more. The American electorate is more divided than ever — and the question is not how ugly this debate will get but whether there are many minds left to convince. Everyone expects huge

ratings — but I’m curious how many will tune in as voters searching for answers vs. viewers there for some counterprogramming that will have their views pre-confirmed. It all depends on what

happens, and I am not here to predict. But there is so much evidence most people want to tune _out_ from this election, not tune _in_. “News fatigue” has brought tough times and falling

traffic for news organizations hoping a lucrative 2024 “Trump bump” could help their flagging businesses. CNN (and MSNBC and even Fox) have seen ratings crater, and the debate is seen as a

quick (but everyone seems to agree temporarily) fix. The ultimate hate watch? Pollsters are describing a growing number of voters as “double haters.” One question I wonder about is whether

there will be any consensus about what actually happens at the debate. A poll in March found that Americans are even divided over whether democracy is working (a bit of good news: Most

respondents believe America will remain a democracy ..._ through their own lifetimes!)_. Let’s face it, neither of these aging men is as sharp as he once was. And are there voters still out

there still curious to learn surprising new insights about two people who have been on the public stage for four decades? Trump and Biden both have a lot of convincing to do. Trump, despite

his surprisingly strong polling, faces disengaged supporters. A poll last fall found 52% of voters don’t approve of Biden’s performance — in deep blue California! And that means both will

come out fighting. CNN is reportedly preparing for the worst, including making sure “each man’s microphone will be muted when it is not his turn to speak.” Will we look back at “Will you

shut up, man?” as a high point in debate dialogue? THE MUST-READ: The Times’ most influential L.A. political power players THE CALIFORNIA CONUNDRUM: Karen Bass, London Breed and figuring out

how to run a big California city. THE L.A. TIMES SPECIAL: Jeffrey Katzenberg: Biden’s big money man in Hollywood P.S. Pro-Palestinian protesters met guests outside the big Democratic

fundraiser on Saturday, likely a preview of what the DNC Convention in August will be. — Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up here to get it in your inbox.