Mathematical proof versus observation

Mathematical proof versus observation


Play all audios:


ABSTRACT THE history of the physical sciences offers many examples of theories which have been ‘proved’ mathematically and been set as foundation-stones in the edifice of science, only long


after and when a superstructure has been reared upon them to be abandoned as untenable. The operation of taking out a ‘foundation stone of science’ presents all the difficulties which are


encountered in extracting its physical parallel. Access through your institution Buy or subscribe This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access


through your institution Subscribe to this journal Receive 51 print issues and online access $199.00 per year only $3.90 per issue Learn more Buy this article * Purchase on SpringerLink *


Instant access to full article PDF Buy now Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS: * Log in * Learn about institutional


subscriptions * Read our FAQs * Contact customer support SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS EVOLVING SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERY BY UNIFYING DATA AND BACKGROUND KNOWLEDGE WITH AI HILBERT


Article Open access 14 July 2024 ENTROPY, IRREVERSIBILITY AND INFERENCE AT THE FOUNDATIONS OF STATISTICAL PHYSICS Article 01 May 2024 ADVANCING MATHEMATICS BY GUIDING HUMAN INTUITION WITH AI


Article Open access 01 December 2021 AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Ann Arbor, Michigan WM. H. HOBBS Authors * WM. H. HOBBS View author publications You can also search for


this author inPubMed Google Scholar RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE HOBBS, W. Mathematical Proof _versus_ Observation. _Nature_ 118, 915


(1926). https://doi.org/10.1038/118915a0 Download citation * Issue Date: 25 December 1926 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/118915a0 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with


will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt


content-sharing initiative