News and Views | Nature

News and Views | Nature


Play all audios:


ABSTRACT THE Wild Birds Protection Bill is dead, after the second reading had given nromise of a safe passage through the House of mons. In the opinion of those best competen to judge, it


was a measure designed to give better protection to British birds than even the and scattered Acts, which it was to supersede had done. But it has been killed by slogans devised by


well-intentioned but less well-informed propagandists. It was called a “Rare Birds Protection Bill,” yet it protected every bird in the country; it was sneered at because it gave different


degrees of protection to different birds, but so long as some birds we persecuted and some are not, it is reasonable that the degree of protection should vary; it was said that the birds


would be better off without the Bill, bxvt the statement betrays lack of knowledge of the operation of the present Acts and the particular points on which experience has proved them to bo


weakest; it was said that public opinion was against the Bill; oon the contrary, the informed public were in favour of the Bill. The death of the Bill is to be regretted by all interested in


the effective protection of birds in Great Britain, the more so as its disappearance is due to the blind faith of certain members of Parliament in the propaganda of malcontents. Access


through your institution Buy or subscribe This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your institution Subscribe to this journal


Receive 51 print issues and online access $199.00 per year only $3.90 per issue Learn more Buy this article * Purchase on SpringerLink * Instant access to full article PDF Buy now Prices may


be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS: * Log in * Learn about institutional subscriptions * Read our FAQs * Contact customer support


RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE News and Views. _Nature_ 120, 126–130 (1927). https://doi.org/10.1038/120126a0 Download citation * Issue


Date: 23 July 1927 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/120126a0 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a


shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative