A test of evolutionary theories of senescence
- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN
Play all audios:

ABSTRACT Senescence is the post-maturation decline in survivorship and fecundity that accompanies advancing age. Two main evolutionary theories have been proposed to account for senescence.
(1) The mutation-accumulation theory. Deleterious mutations exerting their effects only late in life would tend to accumulate, because of their minimal effects on fitness1,2. More precisely,
exclusively late-acting deleterious mutations will attain higher equilibrium frequencies under mutation–selection balance than will mutations that act early, resulting in lower mean values
for fitness components late in life (ref. 3, p. 218). Medawar1 emphasized the possibility that this effect would be enhanced by selection of modifiers that postpone the age of onset of
genetic diseases. (2) The pleiotropy theory. Williams4 suggested that many of the genes with beneficial effects on early fitness components have pleiotropic deleterious effects on late
fitness components, but are nevertheless favoured by natural selection. (These theories are based on the decline with age in the effect of age-specific fitness-component changes on total
fitness3 (ref. 3, pp. 206–214 and refs 4, 5). Either or both of these theories could apply in any particular population.) Selection experiments in _Drosophila_6 and _Tribolium_7 support the
pleiotropy theory, although one such experiment gave results that only bordered on significance8, but the mutation–accumulation theory has never been tested. The present results provide
evidence for the pleiotropy theory, but do not support the mutation–accumulation theory. Access through your institution Buy or subscribe This is a preview of subscription content, access
via your institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your institution Subscribe to this journal Receive 51 print issues and online access $199.00 per year only $3.90 per issue Learn more Buy
this article * Purchase on SpringerLink * Instant access to full article PDF Buy now Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS: *
Log in * Learn about institutional subscriptions * Read our FAQs * Contact customer support SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS THE SELECTION FORCE WEAKENS WITH AGE BECAUSE AGEING EVOLVES
AND NOT VICE VERSA Article Open access 03 February 2022 INCLUSIVE FITNESS FORCES OF SELECTION IN AN AGE-STRUCTURED POPULATION Article Open access 05 September 2023 MOLECULAR EVOLUTION AND
THE DECLINE OF PURIFYING SELECTION WITH AGE Article Open access 11 May 2021 REFERENCES * Medawar, P. B. _An Unsolved Problem of Biology_ (Lewis, London, 1952); _The Uniqueness of the
Individual_ (Methuen, London, 1957). Google Scholar * Edney, R. B. & Gill, R. W. _Nature_ 220, 281 (1968). Article ADS CAS Google Scholar * Charlesworth, B. _Evolution in
Age-Structured Populations_ (Cambridge University Press, 1980). MATH Google Scholar * Williams, G. C. _Evolution_ 11, 398–411 (1957). Article Google Scholar * Hamilton, W. D. _J. theor.
Biol._ 12, 12–45 (1966). Article CAS Google Scholar * Wattiaux, J. M. _Evolution_ 22, 406–421 (1968). Article CAS Google Scholar * Sokal, R. R. _Science_ 167, 1733–1734 (1970). Article
ADS CAS Google Scholar * Mertz, D. B. _Physiol. Zool._ 48, 1–23 (1975). Article Google Scholar * Ives, P. T. _Genetics_ 30, 167–196 (1945); _Evolution_ 24, 507–518 (1970). CAS PubMed
PubMed Central Google Scholar * Falconer, D. S. _Introduction to Quantitative Genetics_ (Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh, 1960). Google Scholar * Mukai, T., Cardellino, R. A., Watanabe, T.
K. & Crow, J. F. _Genetics_ 78, 1195–1208 (1972). Google Scholar * Wright, S. in _Quantitative Inheritance_ (eds Waddington, C. H. & Reeve, E. C. R.) 5–41 (HMSO, London, 1952);
_Evolution and the Genetics of Populations_ Vol. 1, 232 (University of Chicago Press, 1968). Google Scholar * Kempthorne, O. _An Introduction to Genetic Statistics_ (Wiley, New York, 1957).
MATH Google Scholar * Mahumunulu, D. M. _Ann. math. Statist._ 34, 521–527 (1963). Article MathSciNet Google Scholar * Lints, F. A. _Genetics and Ageing_ (Karger, Basel, 1978). Google
Scholar * Lints, F. A. & Hoste, C. _Evolution_ 31, 387–404 (1977). Article CAS Google Scholar * Comfort, A. _Nature_ 172, 83 (1953). Article ADS CAS Google Scholar * Rose, M. R.
& Charlesworth, B. _Genetics_ (in the press). Download references AUTHOR INFORMATION Author notes * Michael Rose Present address: Laboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin,
Madison, Wisconsin, 53706 AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * School of Biological Sciences, University of Sussex, Palmer, Brighton, BN1 9QG, UK Michael Rose & Brian Charlesworth Authors *
Michael Rose View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Brian Charlesworth View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed
Google Scholar RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Rose, M., Charlesworth, B. A test of evolutionary theories of senescence. _Nature_ 287,
141–142 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1038/287141a0 Download citation * Received: 08 February 1980 * Accepted: 20 June 1980 * Issue Date: 11 September 1980 * DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1038/287141a0 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently
available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative