Evaluation of a methylenetetrahydrofolate-dehydrogenase 1958g>a polymorphism for neural tube defect risk

Evaluation of a methylenetetrahydrofolate-dehydrogenase 1958g>a polymorphism for neural tube defect risk


Play all audios:


ABSTRACT Genetic variants of enzymes involved in the folate pathway might be expected to have an impact on neural tube defect (NTD) risk. Given its key role in folate metabolism, the


methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase 1 (_MTHFD1_) gene could represent an attractive candidate in NTD aetiology. In this study, the impact of the _MTHFD1_ 1958G>A polymorphism on NTD


risk in the Italian population was examined both by hospital-based case-control and family-based studies. The _MTHFD1_ 1958G>A polymorphism was genotyped in 142 NTD cases, 125 mothers,


108 fathers and 523 controls. An increased risk was found for the heterozygous 1958G/A (OR=1.69; _P_=0.04) and homozygous 1958A/A (OR=1.91; _P_=0.02) genotypes in the children. Significant


association was also found when combined 1958G/A and 1958A/A genotypes of cases were compared with the 1958G/G genotype (OR=1.76; _P_=0.02). The risk of an NTD-affected pregnancy of the


mothers was increased 1.67-fold (_P_=0.04) only when a dominant effect (1958G/A or 1958A/A vs 1958G/G) of the 1958A allele was analysed. The combined TDT/1-TDT (Z=2.11; _P_=0.03) and FBAT


(Z=2.4; _P_=0.01) demonstrated a significant excess of transmission of the 1958A allele to affected individuals. In summary, our results indicate that heterozygosity and homozygosity for the


_MTHFD1_ 1958G>A polymorphism are genetic determinants of NTD risk in the cases examined. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS ASSOCIATION OF POLYMORPHISMS OF _FOLR1_ GENE AND _FOLR2_


GENE AND MATERNAL FOLIC ACID SUPPLEMENTATION WITH RISK OF VENTRICULAR SEPTAL DEFECT: A CASE-CONTROL STUDY Article 10 March 2022 FOLATE DEFICIENCY DISTURBS _PEG10_ METHYLATION MODIFICATIONS


IN HUMAN SPINA BIFIDA Article 21 December 2021 CONTRIBUTION OF UNIPARENTAL DISOMY TO FETAL GROWTH RESTRICTION: A WHOLE-EXOME SEQUENCING SERIES IN A PRENATAL SETTING Article Open access 02


January 2024 INTRODUCTION Neural tube defects (NTDs) are one of the most common human congenital malformations in newborn children, affecting annually approximately 1 in 1,000 newborns in


Italy (Mastroiacovo and Bianchi 1991) and 200,000 newborns or more worldwide (Moore et al. 1997). Myelomeningocele, commonly called Spina Bifida, is the most common form of NTD.


Periconceptional supplementation with folic acid reduces a women’s risk of an NTD-affected pregnancy by up to 75% (MRC Vitamin Study Research Group 1991; Czeizel and Dudas 1992). There have


been numerous investigations into genes involved in folate metabolism, yielding at least one polymorphism—677C>T in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (_MTHFR_) gene—that has been


associated with an approximate doubling of the risk of NTDs (Botto and Yang 2000). However, these associations remain controversial, with several studies finding no association (Papapetrou


et al. 1996; Mornet et al. 1997; Speer et al. 1997). Several other genes have been studied, including those encoding folate receptors, cystathionine-β-synthase, methionine synthase,


methionine synthase reductase, and reduced folate carrier-1 (Lucock 2000; Melvin et al. 2000; Gelineau-van Waes and Finnell 2001), but many of these studies still await confirmation and


warrant further investigation. Given its central role in folate metabolism, the 5,10-methenyltetrahydrofolate-cyclohydrolase, 10-formyltetrahydrofolate synthetase (methylenetetrahydrofolate


dehydrogenase: _MTHFD1_) could represent an attractive candidate gene in NTD aetiology. MTHFD1 is a trifunctional protein catalysing three sequential reactions in the interconversion of


1-carbon derivatives of tetrahydrofolate (THF) that are substrates for methionine, thymidylate and de novo purine biosynthesis (Tan et al. 1997). Both NAD- and NADP-dependent MTHFD have been


identified (Mejia and Mackenzie 1985). MTHFD1 is an NADP-dependent cytoplasmic enzyme (often referred to as C1-THF synthase) encoded by a gene on chromosome 14q24 (Rozen et al. 1989); the


_MTHFD1_ cDNA contains an open reading frame of 2,805 bp that encodes a protein of 935 amino acids (Hum et al. 1988). A mitochondrial trifunctional C1-THF synthase has been recently


identified by Prasannan et al. (2003). The gene spans 236 kb on chromosome 6 and encodes a protein of 978 amino acids, including an N-terminal mitochondrial signal sequence. The


mitochondrial isozyme is 61% identical to the human cytoplasmic isoform (Prasannan et al. 2003). Hol et al. (1998) have analysed _MTHFD1_ cDNA sequences of familial and sporadic cases of


NTDs for the presence of mutations. Two amino acid substitutions were identified. The first (R293H) was detected in a patient with familial Spina Bifida and not in 300 control individuals.


The second change, a 1958G>A substitution polymorphism resulting in replacement of the arginine residue at position 653 by glutamine (R653Q), turned out to be present in both patients and


controls with similar frequencies. More recently, Brody et al. (2002) demonstrated that _MTHFD1_ 1958G>A polymorphism is a maternal risk factor for NTD risk in the Irish population.


Mothers who possess two copies of the _MTHFD1_ 1958A allele have an increased risk of an NTD-affected pregnancy. There was also a suggestion that the _MTHFD1_ 1958A allele decreases fetal


viability (Brody et al. 2002). In the present study, we have attempted to replicate this finding by studying the impact of the _MTHFD1_ 1958G>A polymorphism on NTD risk in the Italian


population in hospital-based case-control and family-based studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS STUDY POPULATION The NTD study population consisted of children and their parents seeking treatment


at the Spina Bifida Centre of the Gaslini Children’s Hospital in Genoa, from May 2004 to the present. The Spina Bifida Centre of Gaslini Hospital has recruited children with NTDs from


throughout Italy since 1976, and it sees about 150 new cases annually from both the north and the south of Italy. Of the 165 NTD families ascertained for the 1-year period, 142 (86%) agreed


to participate and were enrolled. For the purposes of this study, 91 complete NTD triads and 51 incomplete triads, in which DNA was not available from all three family members (51 additional


children with NTD, 34 mothers, 17 fathers) were eligible. Information about the type of defect was available for all the children with NTDs, and the cases group included 117 (82%) children


(59% females; median age 12 years, range 1–26 years) affected by lumbar and sacral myelomeningocele (L1–S2 levels), 8 (6%) children with lipomyeloschisis, and 17 (12%) children with spina


bifida occulta. Of the 523 control subjects, 208 (40%) were randomly selected children who were admitted to the Gaslini Children’s Hospital for miscellaneous illnesses (orthopaedic,


otolaryngeal, dental disorders, acute surgical conditions, and trauma). The other 315 control subjects (60%) were healthy young adults who had contributed samples to the blood donor bank of


the Gaslini Institute. None had a first-degree relative with an NTD. The samples from all control subjects were anonymous; information associated with these samples (children and adults


alike) included sex, region of birth, and age. All participants were Italian with antecedents from all parts of the country. Individuals born in Sardinia were excluded. The local ethical


committee approved the protocol and written consent was obtained from all patients, parents, and control individuals. GENETIC ANALYSIS Genomic DNA was extracted from fresh blood samples


using the GenEluteTM mammalian genomic DNA miniprep kit (Sigma, Taufkirchen, Germany). The presence of the _MTHFD1_ 1958G>A polymorphism was investigated by restriction fragment length


polymorphism (RFLP) assay as described by Hol et al. (1998). The digested PCR fragments were analysed by ethidium bromide-stained 4% MetaPhor agarose (FMC BioProducts, Rockland, ME) gel


electrophoresis. Repeat genotyping assays were performed on all samples that gave equivocal genotypes. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Allele frequencies in the NTD patients, mothers, fathers, and


controls were determined by counting alleles and calculating proportions. Differences in genotype and allele frequency were evaluated by χ2 analysis. The Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE)


analysis was tested using _χ_2 statistics for goodness of fit (1 degree of freedom). Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) for the presence of mutation


_MTHFD1_ 1958G>A in patients and controls. The OR was calculated with 95% confidence interval (CI) and the wild-type pattern was used as a reference. A codominant (the three genotypes


studied separately), a dominant (1958A/A or 1958G/A genotypes compared with 1958G/G genotype) and a recessive (1958A/A genotype compared with 1958G/G or 1958G/A genotype) model for the


effect of the 1958G>A variant was examined. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL). The attributable fraction, representing the proportion of cases


in the target population that is attributable to the presence of the mutation(s), was estimated using the equation proposed by Miettinen (1974): (AF=[fCa (OR-1)]/OR), where _f_Cais the


fraction of cases with the genotype(s) under study (1958G/A or 1958A/A) and OR is the associated OR. Power computations were performed employing the calculator available at


http://calculators.stat.ucla.edu/powercalc/. Three different statistical tests were applied for family-based studies: classical transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) (Spielman et al. 1993),


combined TDT/1-TDT (Sun et al. 1999), and the family-based association test (FBAT) (Rabinowitz and Laird 2000). For TDT, we used 91 completed triads. Moreover, owing to 51 incomplete


families, we applied the combined TDT/1-TDT test, which combines data from families in which both parental genotypes are available and families in which only one parental genotype is


available. We also used the FBAT program (version 1.5.5; http://www.biostat.harvard.edu/~fbat/fbat.htm), which allows testing for association even if no parental genotype data are available.


Based on the results of the unrelated case-control analysis, a biallelic test was performed using dominant inheritance model. RESULTS CASE-CONTROL STUDY Table 1 shows the _MTHFD1_ genotype


distributions, allele frequencies, and the results of HWE analysis. The genotype distribution for the _MTHFD1_ 1958G>A mutation in the controls was as expected according to the HWE


(_P_=0.41). The frequency of the A allele of the _MTHFD1_ 1958G>A mutation was 0.487 among control individuals. No statistically significant heterogeneity was found in the allelic


frequencies by type of controls (children or young adults) (_P_ =0.66) or by sex (_P_ =0.54). Moreover, we found that the genotype distribution obeyed the constraints of HWE also in NTD


cases and their parents. Chi squared analysis revealed that allele frequencies were significantly different between cases and controls (_P_ =0.02; data not shown). To evaluate the impact of


the _MTHFD1_ 1958G>A variant on NTD risk, we calculated the OR and 95% CI (Table 2). We found a significant increased risk for both heterozygous (OR=1.69; 95% CI: 1–2.77; _P_ =0.04) and


homozygous (OR=1.91; 95% CI: 1.1–3.29; _P_ =0.02) genotypes in the children. Moreover, when the dominant model was applied (1958G/A or 1958A/A vs 1958G/G), there was a nominally significant


increase in NTD risk (OR=1.76; 95% CI: 1.1–2.82; _P_ =0.02). A recessive effect of the 1958A variant (1958A/A vs 1958G/G or 1958G/A) in cases was not significant (OR=1.32; _P_ =0.21). In


cases homozygous for the 1958A allele, the power to detect an OR of 1.91 was 85% (α<0.05, frequency of the risk allele=0.487, two-sided); thus, the likelihood of a type II error in our


data set is low. We calculated that the proportion of NTD cases that could be attributed under a dominant effect model of the 1958A variant was about 35.6% (population attributable


fraction). A significantly elevated risk of NTD was observed in mothers who were heterozygous for the _MTHFD1_ G1958>A variant (OR=1.73; 95% CI: 1.04–2.89; _P_ =0.04). A maternal 1958A/A


homozygous genotype was not a significant independent contributor to NTD risk (OR=1.54; 95% CI: 0.86–2.77; _P_ =0.15). Nevertheless, when a dominant effect (1958G/A or 1958A/A vs 1958G/G) of


the 1958A allele of the mothers was considered, we found a 1.67-fold increased risk (_P_ =0.04). On the contrary, no significant association was seen when the recessive model of the 1958A


variant of the mothers was applied (1958A/A vs 1958G/G or 1958G/A; OR=1.05; 95% CI:0.67–1.64; _P_ =0.91). No increased risk was found for the genotype of the fathers, regardless of the


genetic model applied (codominant, dominant or recessive). FAMILY-BASED STUDY The results of family-based studies are presented in Table 3. The 142 NTD families included 91 for whom maternal


and paternal DNA samples were available and 51 for whom only maternal or only paternal samples were obtained (incomplete families). We investigated whether there was any bias in the


transmission of the A allele using a classical TDT test (Spielman et al. 1993), which tests allele transmission from heterozygous parents regardless of case genotype outcome. TDT indicated


that, from 96 heterozygous parents, the A allele was transmitted 55 times (57%), whereas the G allele was transmitted 41 times (43%). This bias in A allele transmission is only suggestive of


an effect (_P_ =0.06). Given the high number of incomplete families, we applied the combined TDT/1-TDT test, which combines data from families in which both parental genotypes are available


and families in which only one parental genotype is available (Sun et al. 1999). In total, 51 families in which only one parent was available, and 91 triads were used for analysis by the


combined TDT/1-TDT test. A significant excess of transmission of the A allele to affected individuals was found (_Z_ score=2.11; _P_ =0.03). More significant association was found by FBAT


analysis (_Z_=2.4; _P_=0.01, for a dominant model). DISCUSSION The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of a common polymorphism of the _MTHFD1_ gene, the 1958G>A variant, on the


risk of NTD in the Italian population. The degree of risk was assessed both by hospital-based case-control and family-based studies. The frequency of the 1958A allele in our controls was


0.487, which is comparable to the frequencies of 0.450 found in the control populations in Ireland and Germany (Hol et al. 1998; Brody et al. 2002). The frequency reported here is higher


than that (0.39) found in a small sample of Italian DNAs from a CEPH diversity panel (Shi et al. 2003). This discrepancy may be due to the small size of the individual groups included in


that panel compared to the current study. The case-control study has indicated that cases carrying one (1958G/A) or two (1958A/A) alleles for the _MTHFD1_ 1958G>A polymorphism have a


significantly increased risk of NTD in comparison with individuals who have no copies of this polymorphism (1958G/G homozygotes). The magnitude of this association, i.e. the OR, was similar


both when the genotypes were analysed separately (codominant model; 1958G/A=1.69; 1958A/A=1.91) and under a dominant model of action (1958G/A or 1958A/A=1.76). However, the significance of


the association studies is not impressive enough to allow definitive conclusions regarding whether this polymorphism is a risk factor for NTD. We found no association between any of the


fathers’ genotypes and NTDs. When we analysed maternal genotypes, a significant dominant maternal effect was observed (1.67-fold increased risk in mothers carrying 1958G/A or 1958A/A


genotypes vs 1958G/G); no significant association was found when homozygosity of the mothers was considered separately (1958A/A vs 1958GG), or when a recessive model within mothers (1958A/A


vs 1958G/A or 1958G/G) was analysed. Furthermore, the results of the present case-control study are not in agreement with the report of Brody et al. (2002). In fact, in the Irish study the


authors conclude that maternal _MTHFD1_ 1958A/A homozygosity is a risk factor for NTDs, but they did not observe any difference in allele or genotype frequencies between the case and control


groups. Our finding of an association between the _MTHFD1_ 1958G>A genotype of children and NTDs appears to be reasonably powered. Thus, a possible reason for the discrepancy between our


results and the Irish study may be due to population heterogeneity and, therefore, our results apply only to the Italian population. It is also possible that environmental differences can


explain the discrepancies between the Irish and Italian case frequencies. Three different statistical tests were applied to the family-based studies, only two of which, TDT/1-TDT and FBAT,


yielded significant evidence for association between the _MTHFD1_ G1958A polymorphism and NTDs. Despite their significance, these results should be interpreted with caution since the


family-based studies were less powerful than the case-controls studies and need to be confirmed in further studies. Although association studies demonstrated that the maternal _MTHFD1_


1958A/A genotype has no appreciable influence on NTD risk as an independent risk factor, it could be important when other factors are present, including the 1958A/A of the child. On the


basis of the data presented here (association studies), the question of the extent, if any, to which maternal _MTHFD1_ 1958A/A genotype contributes independently to NTD outcome, should be


addressed by studies including much larger numbers of mother-child pairs, or by application of TDT to three-generation families that include heterozygous maternal grandparents, as suggested


by Mitchell (1997). The rationale for a possible association between _MTHFD1_ genotype and NTD risk is based on the important role of the MTHFD1 protein in folate pool maintenance. The


_MTHFD1_ 1958G>A substitution affects the synthetase domain of the enzyme, possibly altering nucleotide pools available for DNA synthesis and, thus, affect cell division. No specific


biochemical phenotype has been associated with this genetic variant. The _MTHFD1_ 1958G>A polymorphism is unlikely to have a direct effect on folate and homocysteine levels (Brody et al.


2002). Nevertheless, this polymorphism may produce an effect at the cellular level without causing perturbations in plasma metabolites. In summary, our results indicate that the _MTHFD1_


1958G/A and 1958A/A genotypes in NTD cases are genetic determinants of NTD risk with dominant action. Further investigations are warranted to clarify if maternal genotype may confer risk,


independently, or in the presence of a mutant _MTHFD1_ genotype in the children. Clearly, our understanding of the role of the _MTHFD1_ gene in NTD risk is incomplete, and studies of other


variants in this gene that were not examined here are required. REFERENCES * Botto LD, Yang Q (2000) 5,10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene variants and congenital anomalies: a HuGE


review. Am J Epidemiol 151:862–877 Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Brody LC, Conley M, Cox C, Kirke PN, McKeever MP, Mills JL, Molloy AM, O’Leary VB, Parle-McDernott A, Scott JM,


Swanson DA (2002) A polymorphism, R653Q, in the trifunctional enzyme methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase-methenyltetrahydrofolate cyclohydrolase-formyl-tetrahydrofolate synthetase is a


maternal genetic risk factor for neural tube defects. Report of the Birth Defects Research Group. Am J Hum Genet 71:1207–1215 Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Czeizel


A, Dudas I (1992) Prevention of the first occurence of neural-tube defects by periconceptional vitamin supplementation. N Engl J Med 327:1832–1835 Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  *


Gelineau-van Waes J, Finnell RH (2001) Genetics of neural tube defects. Semin Pediatr Neurol 8:160–164 Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Hol FA, van der Put NM, Geurds MP, Heil SG,


Trijbels FJ, Harnel BC, Mariman EC, Blom HJ (1998) Molecular genetic analysis of the gene encoding the trifunctional enzyme _MTHFD_ (methylenetetrahydrofolate


dehydrogenase-methenyltetrahydrofolate cyclohydrolase-formyl-tetrahydrofolate synthetase) in patients with neural tube defects. Clin Genet 53:119–125 Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  *


Hum DW, Bell AW, Rozen R, Mackenzie RE (1988) Primary structure of a human trifunctional enzyme. Isolation of a cDNA encoding methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase-methenyltetrahydrofolate


cyclohydrolase-formyl-tetrahydrofolate synthetase. J Biol Chem 263:15946–15950 CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Lucock M (2000) Folic acid: nutritional biochemistry, molecular biology, and


role in disease processes. Mol Genet Metab 71:121–138 Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Mastroiacovo PP, Bianchi F (1991) The descriptive epidemiology of congenital defects at birth in


Italy. Epidemiol Prev 13:94–103 CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Mejia NR, Mackenzie RE (1985) NAD-dependent methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase is expressed by mortal cells. J Biol Chem


260:14616–14620 CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Melvin EC, George TM, Worley G, Franklin A, Mackey J, Viles K, Shah N, Drake CR, Enterline DS, McLone D, Nye J, Oakes WJ, McLaughlin C, Walker


ML, Peterson P, Brei T, Buran C, Aben J, Ohm B, Bermans I, Qumsiyeh M, Vance J, Pericak-Vance MA, Speer MC (2000) Genetic studies in neural tube defects. NTD Collaborative Group. Pediatr


Neurosurg 32:1–9 Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Miettinen OS (1974) Proportion of disease caused or prevented by a given exposure, trait or intervention. Am J Epidemiol 99:325–332


Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Mithchell LE (1997) Differentiating between fetal and maternal genotypic effects, using the transmission test for linkage disequilibrium. Am J Hum


Genet 60:1006–1007 Google Scholar  * Moore CA, Li S, Li Z, Hong SX, Gu HQ, Berry RJ, Mulinare J, Erickson JD (1997) Elevated rates of severe neural tube defects in a high prevalence area in


northen China. Am J Med Genet 73:113–118 Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Mornet E, Muller F, Lenvoisè-Furet A, Delezoide AL, Col JY, Simon-Bouy B, Serre JL (1997) Screening of the


C677T mutation on the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene in French patients with neural tube defects. Hum Genet 100:512–514 Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * MRC Vitamin Study


Research Group (1991) Prevention of neural tube defects. Results of the MRC Vitamin Study. Lancet 2:131–137 Google Scholar  * Papapetrou C, Linch SA, Burn J, Edwards YH (1996)


Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase and neural tube defects. Lancet 348:58 Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Prasannan P, Pike S, Peng K, Shane B, Appling D (2003) Human mitochondrial


C1-tetrahydrofolate synthase: gene structure, tissue distribution of the mRNA, and immunolocalization in Chinese hamster ovary cells. J Biol Chem 278:43178–43187 Article  CAS  PubMed  Google


Scholar  * Rabinowitz D, Laird N (2000) A unified approach to adjusting association tests for population admixture with arbitrary pedigree structure and arbitrary missing marker


information. Hum Heredity 50:211–223 Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Rozen R, Barton D, Du J, Hum DW, MacKenzie RE, Francke U (1989) Chromosomal localization of the gene for the


human trifunctional enzyme, methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase-methenyltetrahydrofolate cyclohydrolase-formyl-tetrahydrofolate synthetase. Am J Hum Genet 44:781–786 CAS  PubMed  PubMed


Central  Google Scholar  * Shi M, Caprau D, Romitti P, Christensen K, Murray JC (2003) Genotype frequencies and linkage disequilibrium in the CEPH human diversity panel for variants in


folate pathway genes MTHFR, MTHFD, MTRR, RFC1, and GCP2. Birth Defects Res A 67:545–549 Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Speer MC, Worley G, Mackey JF, Melvin E, Oakes WJ, George TM (1997)


The thermolabile variant of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (_MTHFR_) is not a major risk factor for neural tube defect in American Caucasians. Neurogenetics 1:149–150 Article  CAS 


PubMed  Google Scholar  * Spielman RS, McGinnis RE, Ewens WJ (1993) Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Am J


Hum Genet 52:506–516 CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Sun F, Flanders WD, Yang Q, Khoury MJ (1999) Transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) when only one parent is available:


the 1-TDT. Am J Epidemiol 150:97–104 Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Tan LU, Drury EJ, Mackenzie RE (1997) Methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase-methenyltetrahydrofolate


cyclohydrolase-formyl-tetrahydrofolate synthetase; a multifunctional protein from porcine liver. J Biol Chem 252:1117–1122 Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors


are grateful to the patients and their families, whose collaboration and understanding have made this work possible. We also thank the G.A.S.B.I. (Genitori Associati Spina Bifida Italia


ONLUS) and Ruiu Ilaria for technical support. This study was supported by grants from the Ministry of Health of Italy: Ricerca Corrente 2003; Ricerca Finalizzata Ministeriale 2003; grant


number: 128. The experiments described in this manuscript comply with the current laws of Italy. AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Unità Operativa di Neurochirurgia, Istituto G.


Gaslini, Largo G. Gaslini 5, 16148, Genoa, Italy Patrizia De Marco, Elisa Merello, Samantha Mascelli, Alessandro Raso, Armando Cama & Valeria Capra * Servizio di Epidemiologia e


Biostatistica, Istituto G. Gaslini, Genoa, Italy Maria Grazia Calevo Authors * Patrizia De Marco View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Elisa


Merello View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Maria Grazia Calevo View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed 


Google Scholar * Samantha Mascelli View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Alessandro Raso View author publications You can also search for


this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Armando Cama View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Valeria Capra View author publications You can also


search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Valeria Capra. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE De


Marco, P., Merello, E., Calevo, M.G. _et al._ Evaluation of a methylenetetrahydrofolate-dehydrogenase 1958G>A polymorphism for neural tube defect risk . _J Hum Genet_ 51, 98–103 (2006).


https://doi.org/10.1007/s10038-005-0329-6 Download citation * Received: 08 July 2005 * Accepted: 09 October 2005 * Published: 01 February 2006 * Issue Date: February 2006 * DOI:


https://doi.org/10.1007/s10038-005-0329-6 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not


currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative KEYWORDS * Folate metabolism * _MTHFD1_ * Neural tube defects *


Single nucleotide polymorphism