Experience of concurrent peritoneal dialysis and vps
- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN
Play all audios:

Access through your institution Buy or subscribe The experience of 135 centres participating in the International Pediatric Peritoneal Dialysis Network with regard to children with
ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPS) on peritoneal dialysis has been collated to inform best practice. Among the 18 patients with concurrent VPS and peritoneal dialysis catheters, the
peritonitis rate was one in 19.6 months. No infections or complications of catheter dysfunction were reported, suggesting that VPS should not preclude peritoneal dialysis in children. This
is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your institution Subscribe to this journal Receive 12 print issues and online access $209.00
per year only $17.42 per issue Learn more Buy this article * Purchase on SpringerLink * Instant access to full article PDF Buy now Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated
during checkout ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS: * Log in * Learn about institutional subscriptions * Read our FAQs * Contact customer support ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER * Dolan, N. M. _ et al_.
Ventriculoperitoneal shunts in children on peritoneal dialysis: a survey of the International Pediatric Peritoneal Dialysis Network. _Pediatr. Nephrol._ doi:10.1007/s00467-012-2303-9
Download references RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Experience of concurrent peritoneal dialysis and VPS. _Nat Rev Nephrol_ 8, 613
(2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2012.208 Download citation * Published: 02 October 2012 * Issue Date: November 2012 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2012.208 SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided
by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative