Staying home or leaving for a party: tissue-dependent choices of tissue-resident memory t cells

Staying home or leaving for a party: tissue-dependent choices of tissue-resident memory t cells


Play all audios:


Access through your institution Buy or subscribe CD8+ T cells differentiate into different types of memory T cells after priming in the lymphoid organs. Central memory T cells selectively


express lymph node homing markers and recirculate between the blood and the secondary lymphoid organs. Effector memory T cells lack lymph node homing capacity, mainly circulate in the blood,


and may enter peripheral tissues. The third subset consists of tissue-resident memory T (Trm) cells that express CD69 and adhesion molecules such as CD11a, CD103, and CD49a that prevent


tissue egress. These Trm cells can be found throughout tissues and have important protective functions in infectious diseases as well as in malignancies. While it has been known for quite


some time that Trm cells form rapid local recall responses, more recent studies indicate that upon secondary infection, Trm cells can also return to the blood and differentiate into


circulating memory T-cell subsets [1, 2]. These studies indicate that Trm 1ells retain functional plasticity and that ex-Trm cells may contribute to systemic immunity. Trm populations of


skin, liver, small intestine, lungs, and other tissues are characterized by a specific set of transcription factors, including Runx3, Hobit, and Blimp-1, that control tissue exit [3].


Despite a common transcriptional signature, Trm cells in different tissues exhibit substantial diversity, as illustrated by the differential expression of certain surface receptors. CD103 is


highly expressed by Trm cells in skin, where this TGFβ-induced adhesion receptor mediates binding to epithelial-expressed E-cadherin [4]. In contrast, liver Trm cells do not express CD103


but instead upregulate CD11a, which is essential for lodgment into the sinusoidal endothelium. A recent paper by Mackay and coworkers has shed new light on the diversity of skin and liver


Trm cells and provides evidence that these Trm populations also have a different capacity to differentiate into circulating memory T cells [5]. This is a preview of subscription content,


access via your institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your institution Subscribe to this journal Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles $119.00 per year only $9.92 per


issue Learn more Buy this article * Purchase on SpringerLink * Instant access to full article PDF Buy now Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout ADDITIONAL


ACCESS OPTIONS: * Log in * Learn about institutional subscriptions * Read our FAQs * Contact customer support REFERENCES * Behr FM, Parga-Vidal L, Kragten NAM, van Dam TJP, Wesselink TH,


Sheridan BS, et al. Tissue-resident memory CD8(+) T cells shape local and systemic secondary T cell responses. Nat Immunol. 2020;21:1070–81. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Fonseca R, Beura


LK, Quarnstrom CF, Ghoneim HE, Fan Y, Zebley CC, et al. Developmental plasticity allows outside-in immune responses by resident memory T cells. Nat Immunol. 2020;21:412–21. Article  CAS 


Google Scholar  * Mackay LK, Minnich M, Kragten NA, Liao Y, Nota B, Seillet C, et al. Hobit and Blimp1 instruct a universal transcriptional program of tissue residency in lymphocytes.


Science. 2016;352:459–63. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Mackay LK, Rahimpour A, Ma JZ, Collins N, Stock AT, Hafon ML, et al. The developmental pathway for CD103(+)CD8+ tissue-resident


memory T cells of skin. Nat Immunol. 2013;14:1294–301. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Christo SN, Evrard M, Park SL, Gandolfo LC, Burn TN, Fonseca R, et al. Discrete tissue


microenvironments instruct diversity in resident memory T cell function and plasticity. Nat Immunol. 2021;22:1140–51. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Beura LK, Wijeyesinghe S, Thompson EA,


Macchietto MG, Rosato PC, Pierson MJ, et al. T cells in nonlymphoid tissues give rise to lymph-node-resident memory T cells. Immunity. 2018;48:327–38 e5. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Park


SL, Zaid A, Hor JL, Christo SN, Prier JE, Davies B, et al. Local proliferation maintains a stable pool of tissue-resident memory T cells after antiviral recall responses. Nat Immunol.


2018;19:183–91. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Im SJ, Hashimoto M, Gerner MY, Lee J, Kissick HT, Burger MC, et al. Defining CD8+ T cells that provide the proliferative burst after PD-1


therapy. Nature. 2016;537:417–21. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Wijeyesinghe S, Beura LK, Pierson MJ, Stolley JM, Adam OA, Ruscher R, et al. Expansible residence decentralizes immune


homeostasis. Nature. 2021;592:457–62. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Fernandez-Ruiz D, Ng WY, Holz LE, Ma JZ, Zaid A, Wong YC, et al. Liver-resident memory CD8(+) T cells form a front-line


defense against malaria liver-stage infection. Immunity. 2016;45:889–902. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  Download references AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Department of


Hematopoiesis, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1066, CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Klaas P. J. M. van Gisbergen * Department of


Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Joke


M. M. den Haan Authors * Klaas P. J. M. van Gisbergen View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Joke M. M. den Haan View author publications You


can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Joke M. M. den Haan. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing


interests. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE van Gisbergen, K.P.J.M., den Haan, J.M.M. Staying home or leaving for a party:


tissue-dependent choices of tissue-resident memory T cells. _Cell Mol Immunol_ 19, 651–652 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41423-021-00828-z Download citation * Received: 09 December 2021 *


Accepted: 14 December 2021 * Published: 13 January 2022 * Issue Date: June 2022 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41423-021-00828-z SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with


will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt


content-sharing initiative