The resilience of men: quality of life after prostate cancer

The resilience of men: quality of life after prostate cancer


Play all audios:


Health-related quality of life encompasses a wide range of experiences and is especially relevant for men with prostate cancer. A recent study reports that across disease stages, overall


self-reported health status and urinary and bowel function were good, but sexual function was poor. Overall, men face prostate cancer with resilience. Access through your institution Buy or


subscribe This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your institution Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals Get


Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription $32.99 / 30 days cancel any time Learn more Subscribe to this journal Receive 12 print issues and online access $209.00 per year only


$17.42 per issue Learn more Buy this article * Purchase on SpringerLink * Instant access to full article PDF Buy now Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS: * Log in * Learn about institutional subscriptions * Read our FAQs * Contact customer support REFERENCES * Patrick, D. L. & Erickson, P. in _Quality of Life


Assessment: Key Issues in the 1990s_ (eds Walker, S. R. & Rosser, R. M.) 11–64 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1993). * World Health Organization. Constitution of the World


Health Organization. _WHO_ https://www.who.int/governance/eb/who_constitution_en.pdf (2006). * Litwin, M. S. Measuring health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. _J. Urol._


152, 1882–1887 (1994). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Potosky, A. L. et al. Prostate cancer practice patterns and quality of life: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes study. _J. Natl Cancer Inst._


91, 1719–1724 (1999). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Cooperberg, M. R., Park, S. & Carroll, P. R. Prostate cancer 2004: insights from national disease registries. _Oncology (Williston


Park, N.Y.)_ 18, 1239–1247 (2004). Google Scholar  * Banez, L. L. et al. The influence of hepatic function on prostate cancer outcomes after radical prostatectomy. _Prostate Cancer Prostatic


Dis._ 13, 173–177 (2010). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Barocas, D. A. et al. Using a population-based observational cohort study to address difficult comparative effectiveness research


questions: the CEASAR study. _J. Comp. Eff. Res._ 2, 445–460 (2013). Article  Google Scholar  * Bill-Axelson, A. et al. Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in prostate cancer: 29-year


follow-up. _N. Engl. J. Med._ 379, 2319–2329 (2018). Article  Google Scholar  * Evans, S. M. et al. Cohort profile: the TrueNTH Global Registry — an international registry to monitor and


improve localised prostate cancer health outcomes. _BMJ Open._ 7, e017006 (2017). Article  Google Scholar  * Downing, A. et al. Quality of life in men living with advanced and localised


prostate cancer in the UK: a population-based study. _Lancet Oncol._ 20, 436–447 (2019). Article  Google Scholar  Download references AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Department


of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Department of Health Policy & Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health and UCLA School of Nursing, Los Angeles, CA, USA


Mark S. Litwin Authors * Mark S. Litwin View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Mark S. Litwin. ETHICS


DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The author declares no competing interests. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Litwin, M.S. The resilience


of men: quality of life after prostate cancer. _Nat Rev Urol_ 16, 334–335 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-019-0176-4 Download citation * Published: 03 April 2019 * Issue Date: June


2019 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-019-0176-4 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable


link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative