Reader TTS

ABSTRACT Joining titanium alloy and stainless steel is becoming an urgent need since their outstanding mechanical properties can be utilized integratedly. However, direct fusion joining of

Ti6Al4V to SS316 can cause brittle Ti-Fe intermetallics which compromise join bonds’ mechanical properties. In this research, Laser 3D Printing was applied to explore a new Ti6Al4V to SS316

multi-metallic structure. A novel filler transition route was introduced (Ti6Al4V → V → Cr → Fe → SS316) to avoid the Ti-Fe intermetallics. Two experimental cases were performed for

comparison to evaluate this novel route’s effect. In the first case, SS316 layer was directly deposited on Ti6Al4V substrate by laser 3D printing, but the sample cracked in the printing

process. Then fracture morphology, phase identification, and micro-hardness were analyzed. In the second case, a multi-metallic structure was fabricated via laser 3D printing following the

transition route. Microstructure characterization and composition distribution were analyzed via scanning electron microscope(SEM) and energy dispersive spectrometry(EDS). x-ray

diffraction(XRD) tests demonstrated the intermetallics were effectively avoided following the transition route. Vickers hardness number(VHN) showed no significant hard brittle phases in the

sample. Comparing with directly depositing SS316 on Ti6Al4V, the usage of the novel transition route can eliminate the intermetallics effectively. These research results are good

contributions in joining titanium alloy and stainless steel. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS PRINTABILITY AND MICROSTRUCTURE OF DIRECTED ENERGY DEPOSITED SS316L-IN718 MULTI-MATERIAL:

NUMERICAL MODELING AND EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS Article Open access 05 October 2022 ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING OF DEFECT-FREE TIZRNBTA REFRACTORY HIGH-ENTROPY ALLOY WITH ENHANCED ELASTIC ISOTROPY

VIA IN-SITU ALLOYING OF ELEMENTAL POWDERS Article Open access 16 February 2024 HIGHLY PRINTABLE, STRONG, AND DUCTILE ORDERED INTERMETALLIC ALLOY Article Open access 25 January 2025

INTRODUCTION Titanium and Ti series alloys have acquired a lot of concerns because they are considered as some of the best engineering materials and biomaterials in the aerospace, nuclear,

and chemical industries. These series alloys have excellent mechanical and metallurgical properties such as light weight, high strength-to-weight ratio, and superior heat resistance. In

order to combine good mechanical and metallurgical properties of titanium alloys, and either good formability or economic prices of other alloys, there is an upsurge of interest to join Ti

alloys with dissimilar structural steels or stainless steels. It is well known that stainless steel is good for weldability and is much more economic than costly Ti alloys, but there is a

challenge to join Ti alloys and stainless steels1. The traditional heat fusion welding has not yet been technically capable of joining Ti alloy with stainless steel because of a

metallurgical incompatibility between them2. Direct heat fusion welding of Ti alloy and stainless steel can result in the formation of a variety of intermetallic compounds such as TiFe,

TiFe2, and so on. These intermetallic compounds are brittle and can embrittle the joint3. These brittle formations can reduce the strength of the bound and lead to failure. Cracking at the

interface of dissimilar bond is the most common failure type. The above negative factors ultimately result in the risk of fatigue failure during usage and service, even failure may happen in

the joining process. Thus, many previous researchers sought the proper metal or alloy to insert as an interlayer in order to eliminate or relieve the influence of intermetallic

compounds4,5,6,7. The frequently used interlayer metals are Cu8, 9, Ni10,11,12,13, Ag14, Al15, as well as other more complex alloys3, 16,17,18. The selection of the interlayer material

depends on its metallurgical properties with Ti and Fe, especially if the interlayer material can form the intermetallic phase with Ti and Fe in the cooling process after experiencing

high-temperature solution annealing. However, the usages of above filler metals unavoidably form intermetallic phases with Ti or Fe in joining Titanium alloy and stainless steel. Laser 3D

printing is an advanced additive manufacturing technology which can directly produce fully dense, multi-metallic parts. In this study, the laser 3D printing is specialized as laser

deposition with blown metal powder. In this process depicted in Fig. 1, a laser beam is used as heat source to melt the metal powder create a melt pool. A powder stream is driven by argon

gas flow and continuously conveyed into the melt pool following the powder feeder pipe. The substrate is attached to a three-axis stage, which is driven by computer numerical control system.

By moving the substrate according to a desired route pattern, a 2D layer can be deposited, then, a 3D object can be formed through building successive layers on top of one another. With the

advantages of high energy density, precise and flexible heating position, and laser beam radius, Laser 3D printing is the most frequently used fusion fabricating method19. In addition,

laser 3D printing is able to produce a multi-materials part quickly with multi-nozzles by adjusting fed powder types and percentage. The Laser 3D printing process has demonstrated its

ability in the area of rapid manufacturing, repairing, remanufacturing, and modification of the metallic components. Joining Ti6Al4V and SS316 leads to the formation of the large amount of

Ti-Fe intermetallic phases. The critical solution was to find an interlayer metal as a transition composition to prevent the formation of an intermetallic phase. However, there is no element

that can directly prevent the formation of intermetallic phase with both Ti6Al4V and SS31617. Therefore, multi-interlayer metals are necessary to fundamentally address the intermetallic

phase and brittleness. Vanadium (V) was first considered as a suitable transition metal since V exhibits an excellent ability to form stable solid solution with Ti as shown in the binary

alloy phase diagram for the Ti-V system in Fig. 2(a). The beta-phase Ti forms a complete range of solid solutions with V20, 21, whereas the behavior of alpha-phase Ti is more limited in this

respect. These promising properties of V as a transition metal are further enhanced by thermal expansion coefficients which form a ratio (Ti:V) of 8.5:8.317. As shown in the binary alloy

phase diagram for the V-Cr system in Fig. 2(b), V and Chromium (Cr) exhibit unlimited mutual solid solubility across the entire system beneath the solidus, so Cr could be a candidate metal

as an adjacent transition composition. Literature from previous studies22,23,24, has reported a brittle intermetallic sigma phase that is always observed in various series of Duplex

stainless steels. The sigma phase often forms under an elevated temperature environment, such as casting, rolling, welding, forging, and aging25. In the Fe-Cr binary alloy system, a pure

sigma phase exists between 472 °C and 830 °C if the mass percentage of Cr is more than 42.7 wt% and less than approximately 48.2 wt%, as shown in the Fe-Cr binary system in Fig. 2(c). There

is obviously no sigma phase formation beneath 472 °C and close to room temperature. After reviewing previous research and experiment results, the properties of the sigma phase in the Fe-Cr

binary alloy system can be summarized as follows. Sigma phase exhibits a tetragonal structure26. It is a brittle phase and can decrease the toughness of the system22. Sigma phase forms in

the cooling process from high temperatures, which is a metaphase in Fe-Cr binary system. To avoid the formation of more than 1% sigma phase, the cooling rate must exceed 0.23 °C/s26. Fe-Cr

phase diagram reveals that in the cooling process, if the temperature is lower than around 472 °C, the dominant phases are the α phase and α’ phase. Moreover, the cooling rate is an

important factor in controlling the sigma phase’s formation, since large cooling rates can greatly bypass the dangerous temperature range from 472 °C to 830 °C, and reduce the probability of

the sigma phase formation. The previous researchers observed the cooling rate in laser 3D printing27. The minimum cooling rate value was guaranteed to be larger than 1 °C/s under the laser

processing parameters in this study. Based on the above analysis, a new filler transition route was designed: Ti6Al4V → V → Cr → Fe → SS316, as shown in Fig. 2(d). In this research, to join

Ti6Al4V and SS316 by Laser 3D printing, a novel filler transition route was designed to prevent the formation of the intermetallic phase. Two experimental cases were performed to evaluate

the effect of this novel route by comparison. SS316 metallic powder was directly deposited on the Ti6Al4V substrate in the first case. The Ti-Fe intermetallic phases formed in this process

were investigated through analyzing fracture morphology, phase identification, and vickers hardness test. In the second case, a thin wall sample was fabricated via laser 3D printing

following the transition composition route. Then, various material characterizations and analysis were performed to evaluate the new filler transition route. This work sets the basis to

fabricate the Ti6Al4V to SS316 multi-metallic structure. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION DIRECTLY PRINT SS316 LAYER ON TI6AL4V SUBSTRATE In the first experimental case, SS316 metallic powder was

directly deposited on the Ti6Al4V substrate by laser 3D printing. In this process, the stainless steel layer fell off from titanium substrate coupled with clear cracking sound (Fig. 3a). The

Ti-Fe intermetallic phases formed in this process were investigated through analyzing fracture morphology, phase identification, and Vickers Hardness test. FRACTURE MORPHOLOGY AND PHASE

IDENTIFICATION It can be clearly observed the fracture morphology is relative smooth, as shown in Fig. 3(b). By observing this fracture morphology, the fracture mechanism is classic cleavage

fracture, which is caused by disruption surface’s separating along some crystal plane. Cleavage fracture always happens in body-centered cubic (BCC) and hexagonal close-packed (HCP) metal

or alloy. Its crack-evolution is very fast so that resulting in metallic component’s disastrous collapse. This phenomenon indicates that the formed phase in fracture area is very hard and

brittle, and almost without any plasticity. XRD test was performed on the fracture area to identify the formed phase. The XRD pattern in Fig. 4 indicates that main intermetallic phases are

Fe2Ti and FeTi, whose brittleness and hardness caused the direct fracture and clear cracking sound under thermal stress and excessive generation of strains at the interface arising from the

thermal expansion difference of titanium and stainless steel alloys. VICKERS HARDNESS NUMBER DISTRIBUTION ON THE JOINT Vickers hardness tests were conducted from Ti6Al4V side to SS316 side,

as shown in Fig. 5. The VHN near crack region is much larger than the base alloys on both sides, which demonstrated that the compounds near crack region have poor plasticity. From the VHN

distribution in Fig. 5, it turns out that VHN keeps approximately in Ti6Al4V substrate then starts to increase when close to the crack region, and reaches the maximum value of 1130 VHN,

where perforative crack happened. The VHN distribution in Fig. 5 illustrates that the formation of intermetallic phases is the primary cause for the failure when directly laser depositing

stainless steel powder on titanium alloy substrate. TI6AL4V TO SS316 MULTI-METALLIC STRUCTURE WITH NOVEL FILLER TRANSITION ROUTE A 3D Ti6Al4V to SS316 Multi-metallic thin wall sample was

fabricated layer by layer on the surface of Ti6Al4V substrate by laser 3D printing, as shown in Fig. 6. A specimen (Fig. 7) was cut off along the cross section of thin wall sample for

material characterization and tests. EDS AND SEM ANALYSIS EDS was used to analyze the element concentration distribution along the transition composition route. All the EDS point test data

for composition curves was plot in Fig. 8. The element distribution curves along the transition composition route on the specimen surface show some interesting features such as intersection,

immediate lift and dip, and stagger up and down. These kinds of phenomenon can demonstrate the clear element concentration tendency along the transition composition. Three ridges indicate

three transition metals: V, Cr, Fe. V and Cr can diffuse to other metal layers easily. Element diffusion is obvious due to multiple heating and high temperature gradient in laser 3D

printing. Another critical phenomenon for mass transfer is the Marangoni convection in the melt pool28. The Marangoni force drives the fluid flow near the melt pool surface to flow outward

then a convection forms in the melt pool. Due to the convection flow, the bottom material will be lifted upward, on the other hand, the material near the melt pool surface will be

transferred downward. The Marangoni convection improves the mass transfer and furthermore improves the diffusion in the multi-metallic structure. Figure 9 depicted the heat affected zone

(HAZ) in the Ti6Al4V substrate, whose depth was 2.674 mm and the width of HAZ was 7.872 mm. To observe the microstructure, SEM tests were done on four sample sites which were selected along

the route. The four sites positions were determined by the maximum weight percentage of Ti, V, Cr, Fe, which were indicated with signs (a), (b), (c), and (d) in the Fig. 8. Figure 10 shows

the microscopic images of microstructure at the four sample sites. Figure 10(a) depicts the microstructure close to the Ti6Al4V substrate, where Ti concentration is highest. It is clear to

observe the interface between substrate and V layer. On the below side of interface, the Ti6Al4V region exhibits an elongated lamellar-type microstructure. This is caused by the high cooling

rate during laser 3D printing process and undergoes rapid solidification. Closer to the interface, thinner and smaller of the microstructure is. From the interface to the Ti6Al4V, it is

clear to find the grain’s epitaxial growth in solidification. On the above side of interface, close to V region, some pores are observed which formed in the laser 3D printing process. Figure

 10(b) depicts the microstructure with maximum V concentration, which exhibits an equiaxed microstructure. Due to the high cooling rate in rapid solidification, the equiaxed microstructure

is elongated approximately along the cooling direction. In the process of laser 3D printing, the powder was carried by argon gas flow then sprayed out into melt pool through powder feeder

nozzle. Some gas was dissolved and entrapped in the melt pool, but may not have sufficient time to escape from the melt pool due to rapid solidification in the laser 3D printing. It can be

noticed that some spherical pores were observed in V layer. Figure 10(c) depicts the microstructure in the region with highest Cr concentration, which exhibits an equiaxed-type

microstructure in this region. Gas porosity is again found in the Cr-rich layer. Figure 10(d) depicts the microstructure where Fe concentration is highest. In this region the microstructure

exhibits classic ferrite and austenite grain. High cooling rate in rapid solidification caused the columnar and elongated lamellar-type microstructure. XRD ANALYSIS To identify the formed

phase in the sample, XRD test was performed on the surface of sample cut from a central cross section of the printed part. Four sites with the maximum weight percentage of Ti, V, Cr, Fe were

selected for XRD test. The positions of the four XRD test sites were same with the positions of four SEM test sites in Fig. 10. The XRD patterns are shown in Fig. 11. On the first site, dot

is used to represent α-Ti; diamond indicates β-Ti; inverted triangle indicates Ti3Al; all of which above were the primary phases in Ti6Al4V. In addition, (V, Cr) solid solution has strong

intensity. Another β-Ti with bcc structure can be detected, which is the solid solution between Ti and Cr. Multiple heating and high temperature gradient in laser 3D printing causes Cr

diffuse in V layer and even near Ti6Al4V. Diffused Cr forms into solid solution with V and Ti respectively. Some bcc peaks are lost in XRD pattern, which is mainly caused by preferred

orientation. When the specimen is prepared for XRD test, grinding and polishing may cause the multi crystal’s grain directions to be oriented. In addition, in the process of laser 3D

printing, metal powders were melted and then re-crystallized. High cooling rate in laser 3D printing results in lathy and tiny grains in the sample. This kind of re-crystallized grain

distortion from typical grain structure may cause the missing peaks at least in some specific directions. The XRD pattern on site-2 is similar with site-1. The intensity of α-Ti and β-Ti is

weakening, but still obvious. The intensity of (V, Cr) is stronger than site-1, which is basically caused by the higher concentrations of Cr and V on site-2. On the site-3, the α-Ti and β-Ti

are not detected, while the intensities of (αFe, V) and (αFe, Cr) keep increasing. (αFe, V) is bcc solid solution of Fe and diffused V. (αFe, Cr) is the solid solution of Fe and Cr, which

is also called ferrite with bcc structure. Austenitic fcc solid solution (γFe, Ni) is detected, which may be in SS316 layer, just detected by larger XRD sample area. There are two kinds of

Fe-Cr solid solutions α and α’. The (α’Fe, Cr) is high concentration Cr bcc, while (αFe, Cr) is low concentration Cr bcc. Both of them precipitate from the segregation of ferritic solid

solution α(δ). In the XRD pattern on site-4, the ferrite bcc has strong intensity, while austenite (γFe, Ni) fcc can also be detected. The phase detected through XRD pattern on site-4 is

close to the phase in SS316. From site-1 to site-3, α-Ti and β-Ti decrease and disappear. On the other hand, ferrite and austenite start to appear from site-3, and increase to the major

phases on site-4. Since V, Cr and Fe are added as intermediate metal, some solid solutions are detected in the transition layers. The XRD patterns can verify the material transition design

from Ti6Al4V to SS316. In addition, the XRD patterns on the four sites indicate that there is not intermetallic phase. TEST FOR THE EXISTENCE OF SIGMA PHASE Referring to the transition route

and binary phase diagrams in Fig. 2, sigma phase is only possible intermetallic phase, therefore the test for sigma phase’s existence is necessary. Two SEM images were obtained between Cr

layer and Fe layer. As can be seen in these two micrographs (Fig. 12a and b), two phases formed in the solidification process. Light gray phase was embedded in the continuous dark phase. The

dark phase is the primary phase at the interface of Cr and Fe. In the micrograph with 12000x magnification, two point EDS tests were done at these two different phases. The element

compositions are shown in Fig. 12(c). Two primary metals, Fe and Cr, are detected in the dark phase, whose weight percentages are 58.8% and 34.8 respectively. A small amount of V is another

composition in the dark phase. The light gray phase has four metal elements: Fe, Cr, V, and Ni. Fe is the primary element with weight percentage of 72.4%. The Cr composition is less, with

the weight percentage of 20.4%. V and Ni weight percentages are less than 5%. Focusing on the region in Fig. 12, one more XRD test was done to detect the primary phase at the interface of Cr

and Fe. The XRD pattern is shown in Fig. 13. It is clear to be observed that ferrite and austenite are two phases, in which the ferrite is much more primary. The XRD pattern of sigma phase

is also shown in Fig. 13, which was provided by Garin and Mannheim29. By comparing the sigma XRD pattern and the detected XRD pattern, there is no formation of sigma phase at the interface

of Cr and Fe. To further detect the sigma phase, the Cr/Fe interface was etched with the reagent (10 g NaOH, 10 g potassium ferricyanide, and 100 ml distilled water), used at room

temperature. If the sigma phase formed in the Cr/Fe interface, it was supposed to be colored orange-brown after 60s etched with above reagent30. An optical micrograph (Fig. 14) depicted the

microstructure morphology in the Cr/Fe interface. An important observation was that, there was not orange-brown region. Long and narrow lathy microstructure was the most primary

microstructure in the observation area. Comparing with Lippold and Kotecki’s research31, this type of lathy morphology is ferrite microstructure. The lathy morphology forms in the super

cooling solidification because of restricted diffusion with high cooling rate. No sigma phase was found with color etching technology. VICKERS HARDNESS ANALYSIS Figure 15 shows the Vickers

hardness test values along with indications of what material region these values belong to. The hardness values were stabilized throughout the SS316 region at 281 ± 19 HV. The highest

hardness values were observed around the Fe-Cr interface followed by a slight decrease in hardness value at the Cr-V interface, and then a slight increase in hardness value at the Fe-V

interface. The subsequent increase in the Ti6Al4V region was stabilized at 375 ± 16 HV. In the total Vickers hardness number (VHN) distribution, the maximum hardness value was 425.3 HV.

There is no obvious area with high VHN in the distribution. All the VHN gradients were slight instead of steep changes. The Vickers hardness result reveals that there is no obvious formation

of hard brittle phases in the pure regions of candidate materials or at the interfaces. Figure 16 shows the Vickers hardness value at the interfaces. It can be observed that there is not

remarkable high VHN values. All the VHNs are less than 450 at the interfaces. CONCLUSIONS The Ti6Al4V/SS316 multi-metallic structure with material route Ti6Al4V → V → Cr → Fe → SS316 was

fabricated by laser 3D printing. Some conclusions are generalized as follows: The multi-metallic structure was fabricated successfully following the material route. The clear element

concentration gradient along the transition composition was observed by EDS point tests. The SEM images taken from the sample indicate the elongated lathy microstructure and tiny epitaxial

grains. The XRD patterns show that the detected phases exist in form of stable solid solution, and no intermetallic phase was found in the XRD pattern. Further analysis was performed at the

interface of Cr/Fe, where the identified phases in XRD pattern were ferrite and austenite phases, but not sigma phase. This conclusion was also supported by color etching technique with

light metallography. In the total VHN distribution, there is no obvious area with high VHN. The novel transition composition route design can be used to prevent the generation of

intermetallic phases between Ti6Al4V and SS316 alloys. METHODS MATERIALS PREPARATION Materials used in this experiment were Ti6Al4V, SS316, V, Cr, and Fe. Ti6Al4V and SS316 were regarded as

the target materials to be joined together. V, Cr, and Fe were used as filler composition that transitions from Ti6Al4V to SS316 successively. The chemical compositions of Ti6Al4V and SS316

are given in Table 1. The V, Cr, Fe, and SS316 are in the form of pure powder. The powder supplier is Atlantic Equipment Engineers. These powders were characterized to analyze particle shape

and size distribution. Microscope images were taken by optical microscope (HIROX Digital Microscope KH-8700). The particles size distributions for all the four types of powder were

displayed by the sieve analysis in Table 2. Figure 17 shows four optical micrographs acquired from the four types of powder. The V particles present irregular shape. The Cr particles present

a very angular shape. The Fe particles have irregular shapes. SS316 powder particles have a mostly spherical shape when compared to the Fe and Cr powder particles. The Ti6Al4V is prepared

in the form of a 2 × 0.5 × 0.25 inch bar. In the process of laser 3D printing, the Ti6Al4V bar was used as a substrate. V, Cr, Fe, and SS316 powder were deposited on the top surface of the

Ti6Al4V bar. DIRECTLY PRINT SS316 LAYER ON TI6AL4V SUBSTRATE Laser 3D printing to join titanium alloy and stainless steel is hindered by the formation of interfacial intermetallics caused by

metallurgical reactions. Ti-Fe intermetallics are the main obstructive. To investigate the Ti-Fe intermetallics in the process, SS316 metallic powder was printed on Ti6Al4V substrate

directly by fiber laser, then analyzed fracture morphology, phase identification, and Vickers Hardness Number (VHN). The laser 3D printing operating parameters are shown in Table 3. PRINT

TI6AL4V TO SS316 MULTI-METALLIC STRUCTURE WITH NOVEL FILLER TRANSITION ROUTE A 3D thin wall sample was fabricated layer by layer on the surface of a Ti6Al4V substrate. V, Cr, Fe, and SS316

powder were deposited successively. The laser processing parameters are detailed in Table 4. A specimen was cut off from the thin wall sample using the Hansvedt Electric Discharge Machine

(EDM). The specimen was then mounted on mounting pressure equipment (Simplimet 1000) using a phenolic resin powder. Then, the offcut cutting surface was grinded using abrasive papers from

180 Silicon Carbide Grit to 1200 Silicon Carbide Grit. After that, the specimen was polished using colloidal silica with a median particle size of 0.05 μm. The prepared specimen is shown in

Fig. 7. With this specimen, EDS and SEM tests were performed on Hitachi S-4700 Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope coupled with an Oxford EDS extension. XRD tests were performed with

XPERT Pro-type diffractometer to identify the phases in the sample. The Vickers hardness test was performed at room temperature using a Struers Duramin-5 hardness tester with a press load

of 9.81 N and loading time of 10 seconds. The printing atmosphere was argon gas atmosphere to avoid oxidization. For each material, 10 layers were printed for each material, with the

thickness for each layer about 0.3~0.5 mm. Since melting temperatures for the four metal powders are different (V:1910 °C; Cr:1907 °C; Fe:1538 °C; and SS316:1370 °C), different heat inputs

were needed to melt the metal powder to take both efficiency and cost into account. For printing each material, a pre-heating step was designed to heat substrate or previous printed part to

form melt pool more quickly. Then a maximum laser power was used to melt the metal powder exiting from powder nozzle. Due to the heat accumulation in the printed part, the maximum laser

powder was controlled to decrease gradually. The accumulated heat in the part and decreased heat input can keep the melt pool with approximately stable size, otherwise the melt pool would

increase and finally cause the printed part to collapse if keep using the maximum laser power. The maximum laser power for the four metal powders were detailed in Table 4. The printing

process was paused for 10 mins to change another metal powder after printing each material. That means the printed part will cool during this powder-changing period. The whole thermal

history was depicted in detail in Fig. 18. Since the four types of powders have different powder morphology, different size distribution, and different densities, the powder feed rates are

different under the same argon gas flow rate. The powder flow rates were quantified in Table 4. With the argon gas flow rate of 6 m/s, the powder feed rates for all the powders were

consistent over the entire printing process. The laser 3D printer set-up used in this study consists of the following units: a laser system which provides the heat source, a powder feeding

system with a ceramic nozzle, and a linear motor system. (1). an IPG Photonics continuous wave (CW) fiber laser system with a 1.064 μm wavelength was used as the laser heat source. The laser

system can provide at most 1000 W laser output power. (2). A commercial powder feeder (Bay State Surface Technologies, Inc, Model-1200) was employed to supply powder in this study. The

inert Argon gas was used to carry the powder through the pipeline system, then sprayed through an Al2O3 ceramic nozzle. (3). Three linear motors (AEROTECH, Inc, Model-100SMB2) were employed

to generate moving path so that the thin wall sample could be fabricated layer by layer. MATERIAL CHARACTERIZATIONS AND TESTS Microstructure characterization was analyzed via scanning

electron microscope(SEM) and optical microscope. Energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS) was used to analyze the element concentration distribution along the transition composition route. 115

sample points uniformly distributed along the route. The bottom of first point is aligned with surface of substrate. The interval between two adjacent points is 0.1 mm. Dwell time for each

point is 5 s. X-ray diffraction(XRD) tests detected the formed phase and analyze if the intermetallics formed in the printed sample. The XRD analysis sample was cut from a central cross

section of Ti6Al4V/SS316 multi-metallic part. The XRD test was performed on the surface area of cross section, as shown in Fig. 7. Based on the EDS points test results, four sites with the

maximum weight percentage of Ti, V, Cr, Fe, were selected for XRD test. The positions of the four XRD test sites were same with the positions of four SEM test sites in Fig. 10. Vickers

hardness number(VHN) showed hardness distribution in the sample. All the material characterization and test instruments were detailed in Table 5. REFERENCES * Sun, Z. & Karppi, R. The

application of electron beam welding for the joining of dissimilar metals: an overview. _Journal of Materials Processing Technology_ 59, 257–267 (1996). Article  Google Scholar  * Lee, M.,

Park, J., Lee, J. & Rhee, C. Phase-dependent corrosion of titanium-to-stainless steel joints brazed by Ag-Cu eutectic alloy filler and Ag interlayer. _Journal of Nuclear Materials_ 439,

168–173 (2013). Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Li, P., Li, J., Xiong, J., Zhang, F. & Raza, S. H. Diffusion bonding titanium to stainless steel using Nb/Cu/Ni multi-interlayer.

_Materials Characterization_ 68, 82–87 (2012). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Majumdar, J. D., Manna, I., Kumar, A., Bhargava, P. & Nath, A. Direct laser cladding of Co on Ti–6Al–4V

with a compositionally graded interface. _Journal of Materials Processing Technology_ 209, 2237–2243 (2009). Article  Google Scholar  * Domack, M. & Baughman, J. Development of

nickel-titanium graded composition components. _Rapid Prototyping Journal_ 11, 41–51 (2005). Article  Google Scholar  * Krishna, B. V., Xue, W., Bose, S. & Bandyopadhyay, A. Functionally

graded Co–Cr–Mo coating on Ti–6Al–4V alloy structures. _Acta biomaterialia_ 4, 697–706 (2008). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Collins, P., Banerjee, R., Banerjee, S. & Fraser, H. Laser

deposition of compositionally graded titanium–vanadium and titanium–molybdenum alloys. _Materials Science and Engineering: A_ 352, 118–128 (2003). Article  Google Scholar  * Kundu, S. _et

al_. Diffusion bonding of commercially pure titanium to 304 stainless steel using copper interlayer. _Materials Science and Engineering: A_ 407, 154–160 (2005). Article  Google Scholar  *

Elrefaey, A. & Tillmann, W. Solid state diffusion bonding of titanium to steel using a copper base alloy as interlayer. _Journal of Materials Processing Technology_ 209, 2746–2752

(2009). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Kundu, S., Chatterjee, S., Olson, D. & Mishra, B. Effects of intermetallic phases on the bond strength of diffusion-bonded joints between titanium

and 304 stainless steel using nickel interlayer. _Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A_ 38, 2053–2060 (2007). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * He, P., Zhang, J., Zhou, R. & Li, X.

Diffusion bonding technology of a titanium alloy to a stainless steel web with an Ni interlayer. _Materials Characterization_ 43, 287–292 (1999). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Kundu, S.

& Chatterjee, S. Interfacial microstructure and mechanical properties of diffusion-bonded titanium–stainless steel joints using a nickel interlayer. _Materials Science and Engineering:

A_ 425, 107–113 (2006). Article  Google Scholar  * Kundu, S. & Chatterjee, S. Characterization of diffusion bonded joint between titanium and 304 stainless steel using a Ni interlayer.

_Materials Characterization_ 59, 631–637 (2008). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Lee, J. G., Hong, S., Lee, M. & Rhee, C. High strength bonding of titanium to stainless steel using an Ag

interlayer. _Journal of Nuclear Materials_ 395, 145–149 (2009). Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * He, P., Yue, X. & Zhang, J. Hot pressing diffusion bonding of a titanium alloy to a

stainless steel with an aluminum alloy interlayer. _Materials Science and Engineering: A_ 486, 171–176 (2008). Article  Google Scholar  * Shiue, R., Wu, S., Chan, C. & Huang, C. Infrared

brazing of Ti-6Al-4V and 17-4 PH stainless steel with a nickel barrier layer. _Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A_ 37, 2207–2217 (2006). Article  Google Scholar  * Lee, M. _et al_.

Interlayer engineering for dissimilar bonding of titanium to stainless steel. _Materials letters_ 64, 1105–1108 (2010). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Lee, J. G., Lee, J., Hong, S., Lee, M.

& Rhee, C. Microstructure and bonding strength of titanium-to-stainless steel joints brazed using a Zr-Ti-Ni-Cu-Be amorphous filler alloy. _Journal of materials science_ 45, 6837–6840

(2010). Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Zhang, B.-g., Ting, W., Duan, X.-h., chen, G.-q. & feng, J.-c. Temperature and stress fields in electron beam welded Ti-15-3 alloy to 304

stainless steel joint with copper interlayer sheet. _Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China_ 22, 398–403 (2012). Article  Google Scholar  * Banerjee, R., Collins, P.,

Bhattacharyya, D., Banerjee, S. & Fraser, H. Microstructural evolution in laser deposited compositionally graded α/β titanium-vanadium alloys. _Acta Materialia_ 51, 3277–3292 (2003).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Spain, E. M. & Morse, M. D. Bond strengths of transition-metal dimers: titanium-vanadium (TiV), vanadium dimer, titanium-cobalt (TiCo), and

vanadium-nickel (VNi). _The Journal of Physical Chemistry_ 96, 2479–2486 (1992). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Sieurin, H. & Sandström, R. Sigma phase precipitation in duplex stainless

steel 2205. _Materials Science and Engineering: A_ 444, 271–276 (2007). Article  Google Scholar  * Michalska, J. & Sozańska, M. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of σ and χ phases

in 2205 duplex stainless steel. _Materials Characterization_ 56, 355–362 (2006). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Michalska, J. & Chmiela, B. In _IOP Conference Series: Materials Science

and Engineering_. 012010 (IOP Publishing). * Hsieh, C.-C. & Wu, W. Overview of Intermetallic Sigma (_ISRN Metallurgy_ 2012 (2012). * Chan, K. W. & Tjong, S. C. Effect of secondary

phase precipitation on the corrosion behavior of duplex stainless steels. _Materials_ 7, 5268–5304 (2014). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Amine, T., Newkirk, J. W.

& Liou, F. An investigation of the effect of direct metal deposition parameters on the characteristics of the deposited layers. _Case Studies in Thermal Engineering_ 3, 21–34 (2014).

Article  Google Scholar  * Tan, W., Bailey, N. S. & Shin, Y. C. Numerical modeling of transport phenomena and dendritic growth in laser spot conduction welding of 304 stainless steel.

_Journal of manufacturing science and engineering_ 134, 041010 (2012). Article  Google Scholar  * Garin, J. & Mannheim, R. Rietveld quantitative analysis of cast super duplex steel.

_Powder Diffraction_ 27, 131 (2012). Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Metals, A. S. F. (ASM, 1986). * Kotecki, D. & Lippold, J. Welding metallurgy and weldability of stainless

steels. _Wiley, Hoboken, NJ Barbero B, Ureta E (2011) Comparative study of different digitization techniques and their accuracy. Comput Aided Des_ 43, 188–206 (2005). Google Scholar  *

Murray, J. L. Phase diagrams of binary titanium alloys. _ASM International_, 354 (1987). * Smith, J., Bailey, D. & Carlson, O. The Cr-V (Chromium-Vanadium) system. _Journal of Phase

Equilibria_ 2, 469–473 (1982). Article  Google Scholar  * Okamoto, H. _Phase diagrams of binary iron alloys_. Vol. 9 (Asm Intl, 1993). Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors

gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided for this study by the NASA EPSCoR Grant number NNX13AM99A. AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Department of Mechanical and

Aerospace Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, 65409, United States Wei Li & Frank Liou * Department of Metallurgical Engineering, Missouri University

of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, 65409, United States Joseph Newkirk * NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, 23681, United States Karen M. Brown Taminger & William J. Seufzer

Authors * Wei Li View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Frank Liou View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed 

Google Scholar * Joseph Newkirk View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Karen M. Brown Taminger View author publications You can also search

for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * William J. Seufzer View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS W.L. conceived and conducted

the experiments, analyzed the experimental results, and wrote the manuscript. F.L., J.N., K.M.B.T., and W.J.S. evaluated all the results. All authors reviewed the manuscript. CORRESPONDING

AUTHOR Correspondence to Wei Li. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare that they have no competing interests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER'S NOTE: Springer

Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This article is licensed under a Creative

Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the

original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in

the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended

use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Li, W., Liou, F., Newkirk, J. _et al._ Investigation on Ti6Al4V-V-Cr-Fe-SS316

Multi-layers Metallic Structure Fabricated by Laser 3D Printing. _Sci Rep_ 7, 7977 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08580-z Download citation * Received: 26 January 2017 *

Accepted: 10 July 2017 * Published: 11 August 2017 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08580-z SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this

content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative