
Limited freshwater cap in the Eocene Arctic Ocean
- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN
Play all audios:

Download PDF Article Open access Published: 12 March 2019 Limited freshwater cap in the Eocene Arctic Ocean Lisa A. Neville1,2, Stephen E. Grasby ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3910-44431 &
David H. McNeil1 Scientific Reports volume 9, Article number: 4226 (2019) Cite this article
3099 Accesses
4 Citations
17 Altmetric
Metrics details
Subjects Environmental impactPalaeoceanography AbstractRemains of the freshwater fern Azolla, found in Eocene (~50 Ma ago) sediments in the modern central Arctic Ocean, have been used to suggest that seasonal freshwater caps covered the entire
Arctic Ocean during that time, with significant impact on global ocean circulation and climate. However, these records are located on the Lomonosov Ridge, which during the Eocene was a
continental fragment barely rifted from Eurasia, separating the smaller Eurasian Basin from the much larger Amerasian Basin to the west. As such, the Lomonosov Ridge does not necessarily
record environmental conditions of the broader Arctic Ocean. We tested the hypothesis of freshwater caps by examining sediment records from the western Amerasian Basin. Here we show that in
the larger Amerasian Basin the Azolla event is associated with marine microfauna along with allochthonous (terrestrially sourced) organic matter. We propose that Azolla events are related to
an increased hydrologic cycle washing terrestrially sourced Azolla, and other organics, into the Arctic Ocean. If freshwater caps did occur, then they were at best restricted to the small
Eurasian Basin and would have had a limited impact on Eocene global climate, contrary to current models.
Similar content being viewed by others Glacial episodes of a freshwater ArcticOcean covered by a thick ice shelf Article 03 February 2021 A 430 kyr record of ice-sheet dynamics and organic-carbon burial in the central Eurasian Arctic Ocean Article Open access 23 April
2025 Isotopic evidence against North Pacific Deep Water formation during late Pliocene warmth Article 23 July 2024 Introduction
The late Paleocene and early Eocene (47.8 to 59.2 Ma time period) provides an analogue to understand impacts of modern climate warming, particularly at high latitudes. During this time the
Arctic experienced extremely warm conditions, including rainforests inhabited by alligators and giant tortoises1,2 with mean annual air temperatures reaching ~15 °C3,4,5. However, the
palaeoenvironment of the Eocene Arctic Ocean has been largely inferred from only one locality, the ACEX cores from the Lomonosov Ridge6,7,8. At this location the ‘Azolla event’ was defined
by thousands of Azolla containing laminae observed in mid Eocene sediments over ~800 kyr6. The large numbers of the free-floating freshwater Azolla fern found at the ridge are suggested to
be a product of fern growth on surface freshwater layers, with floating mats covering the entire Arctic Ocean9. The co-occurrence of marine dinocysts, diatoms, silicoflagellates and
ebridians was explained by Arctic Ocean surface waters being only seasonally fresh8. These Eocene sediments of the Lomonosov Ridge are purported to reflect mid-Artic Ocean conditions. This,
however, is not consistent with plate tectonic models. The Lomonosov Ridge from which the ACEX cores were collected is a seafloor feature more than 1500 km long and 30–80 km wide, rising 3
km above the abyssal plains10. The ridge rifted from Eurasia ~55 Ma, opening the Eurasia Basin11,12. Rifting formed a shallow sill8,10 separating the older and much larger Amerasian Basin
from the younger, smaller and shallower Eurasian basin12 (Fig. 1). Micropaleontological data indicate that marine sediments on the Lomonosov Ridge had an epipelagic depth (0–200 m)
throughout the Paleogene13. This is thought to relate to heat flow from the Nansen-Gakkel seafloor spreading centre, and voluminous magmatism14, as well as far-field in-plane stress that
kept the Lomonosov Ridge shallow, if not elevated above sea level in places, until the Miocene1,15,16. An exposed ridge has even been suggested to have acted as a temporary land bridge
during the Eocene that stimulated the movement of plants and animals1. Thus it remains unclear if the marine sediments from the ACEX core of the Lomonosov Ridge truly represent open Arctic
Ocean conditions, or did the ridge itself act as a sill that formed a restricted Eurasian sub-basin. To test the palaeoceanographic model of the entire Arctic Ocean containing fresh surface
waters, with extensive floating Azolla mats, we examined coeval records from the dominant Amerasian Basin, from a well drilled in the Beaufort Mackenzie Basin (BMB) – western
Artic.
Figure 1Images showing Modern and Eocene Arctic Ocean. (A) Modern bathymetric chart for the Arctic Ocean37. (B) Eocene palaeoreconstruction1,2. White star marks location of Natsek E-56 well, LR =
Lomonosov Ridge, white dot marks the ACEX drilling location.
Full size imageResults Azolla event in the western ArcticThe late Cretaceous–Cenozoic BMB contains 14 km of sediment infill in a rapidly subsiding deltaic and marine environment. We examined the sediment record from a well named ‘Dome Pacific et
al. PEX Natsek E-56′ (herein Natsek E-56) (Fig. 1) located in the southwestern part of the BMB (69°45′21.46″N; 139°44′3458″W, Northwest Territories, Canada). Natsek E-56 preserves the early
to mid Eocene Taglu Sequence (including the Azolla event; Fig. 2)16,17 that consists of weakly consolidated silty to pebbly mudstone. The well represents an expanded section characterized by
rapid rates of sedimentation that is at least 9 times greater than the Lomonosov Ridge, with 2 km of deposition during the Eocene17 (Fig. 2). The depositional environment changed
significantly across an intra-Taglu unconformity, from outer shelf (mesohaline marine micropalaeontological character) to slope/shelf (with marine dinoflagellate cysts and Azolla
present)18,19 (Table 1, Figs 2 and 3).
Figure 2Natsek E-56 stratigraphy and lithology with corresponding ages, and micropaleontological characteristics.
Full size imageTable 1 Summary results for Natsek E-56 of Rock-Eval analyses(pyrolyzed carbon (PC); residual carbon (RC); total organic carbon (TOC); hydrogen index (HI); oxygen index (OI); mineral carbon (MinC)) and carbon isotope organic carbon (δ13Corg).Full size
tableFigure 3
Micropalaeontological and rock-eval data for the Natsek E-56 well. TOC = total organic carbon, RC = residual carbon, OI = oxygen index. Depth represents true vertical depth. (kelly bushing,
true vertical depth). Horizontal grey box represents the Azolla acme (counts tabulated from megaspores and massulae).
Full size imageThe lower Taglu Sequence contains a well-developed circum-Arctic early Eocene benthic agglutinated foraminiferal assemblage assigned to the Portatrochammina tagluensis Zone (Fig. 2).
Foraminifera disappear entirely above the unconformity in the mid Taglu Sequence, replaced by a diverse assemblage of pollen, remains of the freshwater fern Azolla (preserved as megaspores
and massulae (Fig. S1)), as well as dinocysts and other microfossils. The Azolla occurrences consist of two major peaks, one in the upper slope sediments and the other in the outer shelf
(Fig. 2). The Azolla acmes in Natsek E-56 are coeval with the Azolla event on the Lomonosov Ridge in the earliest mid Eocene (onset 50 Ma)6, with similar peaks displayed between both
localities. However, our measured average abundance of Azolla plant parts (85 remains per 100 g of dry sediment; maximum 460 remains/100 g of dry sediment at 521 m) (Fig. 3) is significantly
lower than the 5–30 × 106 remains per 100 g of dry sediment observed in ACEX6. Our Rockeval data also show that the Azolla event laminae in Natsek E-56 have low organic content (Total
Organic Carbon (TOC) = 1.17 wt.%). Rockeval parameters that indicate organic matter type (i.e. marine algae versus terrestrial organics) show high RC, S3, and OI indices (RC = 1.02 wt.%, S3
= 1.72 mgCO2/g, OI = 148.32 mgCO2/TOC) (Fig. 3, Table 1). These results are characteristic of lignin and cellulose plants, indicating that the organic matter that occurs in association with
the Azolla abundance peaks is composed primarily of terrestrial organics, including plants and woody material.
Redox sensitive elements Mo and U have concentrations consistent with post-Archean average shale (PAAS)20, throughout the studied interval of Natsek E-56. These redox sensitive elements are
normally enriched in anoxic sediments21, thus the average concentrations along with low TOC values is inconsistent with a strongly stratified anoxic environment of the ACEX core. However,
the loss of benthic species does indicate low oxygen conditions, suggesting an overall disoxic rather than fully anoxic basin.
Co-occurring Azolla and marine microfaunaWe observed a rich assemblage of dinocysts above the mid-Taglu unconformity (1250 m) that indicate Azolla-containing laminae were deposited under slightly less than normal marine shelf
conditions (Figs 3, S2, Table S1). Dinocysts included the prevalence of Phthanoperidinium, Cordosphaeridium, Hystrichosphaeridium, Glaphyrocysta, and wetzelielloids, along with the sparsity
of offshore genera such as Operculodinium and Nematosphaeropsis, suggesting an inner to outer neritic (shallow marine environment) character22. Similar marine dinocyst assemblages were also
observed with the Azolla event in the Labrador-Baffin Seaway23. At the Lomonosov Ridge, however, only Phthanoperidinium and Senegalinium, low-salinity tolerant genera, were associated with
Azolla blooms22. In our samples, the co-occurrence of Azolla, which cannot tolerate salinities higher than 1–1.6‰, and marine dinocysts in Natsek E-56 is consistent with ACEX core
observations of a mixed fresh/saline water fauna. However, organic matter that co-occurs with both marine fauna and Azolla in Natsek E-56 has an allochthonous origin. We argue then that this
is more consistent with terrestrial material (organic matter and Azolla) being washed into a marine environment, rather than the model of Azolla blooming in situ in seasonal freshwater
caps7. This simpler interpretation is consistent with the lack of evidence for a strongly stratified anoxic water body and alleviates the physical and biological constraints of forming and
maintaining seasonal freshwater caps with floating Azolla mats on the Arctic Ocean surface6 as discussed below.
Constraints on forming a freshwater lens and floating matsModern Azolla ferns only float freely on the surface of quiescent freshwater, such as ponds and canals in tropical, subtropical, and warm temperate regions6,24. They are not found on larger
water bodies exposed to significant wave action that breaks up mats; it would thus be particularly challenging for a floating fern to cover the ~11.4 × 106 km2 Arctic Ocean25. Given the size
and annual modern freshwater flux (~8500 km3)26 the Arctic Ocean could only develop a seasonal freshwater cap of ~0.75 m. Even if increased Eocene cyclone activity27 led to river flow that
was a maximum of twice as high as modern (based on estimates of doubling rainfall28, but not accounting for increased evapotranspiration) the annual freshwater cap would not exceed 1.5 m,
well within the fair-weather mixing zone and storm wave base down to 5 m29. The same increased frequency and intensity of cyclones in the Eocene Arctic and northward shift in storm tracks
would have further exacerbated mixing26,30, making formation and maintenance of a freshwater cap in the central Arctic Ocean highly improbable. After annual die-off, due to lack of winter
sunlight, Arctic Ocean mats would require entirely vegetative reproduction in tolerable bottom water salinities not found in marine environments. Thus, even with a freshwater cap, Azolla
would not have germinated in the Arctic Ocean.
DiscussionWe do not attempt here to re-interpret ACEX data, and allow that the interpretation of a seasonal freshwater lens from that location may still be valid. However, based on the differences
between the BMB and Lomonosov Ridge records, it is possible that a subaerial ridge, or submerged sill, separated the Arctic Ocean into two distinctive bodies of water creating differing
depositional environments. The high Azolla accumulation observed in the ACEX core could at best be a localized phenomenon restricted to the newly formed Eurasia Basin, that did not represent
overall dominant Arctic Ocean conditions. The presence of Azolla along with marine microfauna and terrestrial organic matter in the BMB more likely reflects the change to warmer Eocene
temperatures and an increased hydrological system leading to enhanced mass transport of terrestrial material, including freshwater fern debris, from freshwater bodies surrounding the
Amerasian Basin. If correct, our alternative interpretation has significant implications for models of the transition from a global greenhouse climate towards the modern icehouse being
triggered by Arctic Ocean wide growth of Azolla9,31. Factoring the size of the basin, it was suggested that atmospheric carbon dioxide as high as 2500 to 3500 ppm was reduced by half after
the Azolla Event30, and that growth of Azolla contributed to at least 40% of carbon drawdown via net carbon fixation and subsequent sequestration29. Our results suggest Azolla growth was
significantly more limited than these models and do not support such levels of CO2 drawdown. Other mechanisms should be explored to explain amelioration of Eocene hothouse
conditions.
MethodsCuttings and duplicate samples (n = 195 and n = 5, respectively) were collected from the Natsek E-56 well between 229–2226 m and prepared for analysis at the Geological Survey of Canada
(Calgary). The handpicked samples were washed lightly with tap water to remove drilling mud then oven dried at ~35 °C for ~24 hours before being powdered. Aliquots of the powdered samples
were subjected to the below analysis. Additional details are published elsewhere32.
Rock-Eval 6 pyrolysis was conducted at the Geological Survey of Canada (Calgary) on a Rock-Eval 6 Turbo device following the Basic Method33,34. Total organic carbon (TOC) content and
Rock-Eval parameters were determined on bulk ground samples to provide information on organic carbon source, hydrocarbon source-rock potential, presence of hydrocarbons, and thermal
maturity. Detailed data are presented elsewhere32.
Samples were prepared, processed and analyzed for micropalaeontological content at the Geological Survey of Canada (Calgary), following the standard methods for breaking down samples35. The
processed residues were picked for all microfossils and the microslides are stored in the collections of the Geological Survey of Canada, Calgary (GSCC). Foraminifera were identified using
standard taxonomy36. Palynological data was obtained from Dolby (2011)22 and interpreted by Dr. R.A. Fensome (Geological Survey of Canada – Atlantic).
Data AvailabilityData used in this study are available for download in Geological Survey of Canada. Open File Report 7949 as well as published data in Dolby (2011)22.
References Eberle, J. J. & Greenwood, D. R. Life at the top of the greenhouse Eocene world—A review of the Eocene flora and vertebrate fauna from Canada’s High. Arctic. GSA Bulletin 124,
3–23 (2012).
Article Google Scholar
Kim, S. L., Eberle, J. J., Bell, D. M., Fox, D. A. & Padilla, A. Evidence from shark teeth for a brackish Arctic Ocean in the Eocene greenhouse. Geology 42, 695–698 (2014).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Zachos, J., Pagani, M., Sloan, L., Thomas, E. & Billups, K. Trends, Rhythms, and Aberrations in Global Climate 65 Ma to Present. Science 292, 686–693 (2001).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Lourens, L. J. et al. Astronomical pacing of late Palaeocene to early Eocene global warming events. Nature 435, 1083–1087 (2005).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Sluijs, A. et al. Warm and wet conditions in the Arctic region during Eocene Thermal Maximum 2. Nature Geoscience 2, 777–780 (2009).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Brinkhuis, H. et al. Episodic fresh surface waters in the Eocene Arctic Ocean. Nature 441, 606–609 (2006).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Sluijs, A. et al. Subtropical Arctic Ocean temperatures during the Palaeocene/Eocene thermal maximum. Nature 441, 610–613 (2006).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Moran, K. et al. The Cenozoic palaeoenvironment of the Arctic Ocean. Nature 441, 601–605 (2006).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Speelman, E. N. et al. The Eocene Arctic Azolla bloom: environmental conditions, productivity and carbon drawdown. Geobiology 7, 155–170 (2009).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Backman, J. & Moran, K. Expanding the Cenozoic paleoceanographic record in the Central Arctic Ocean: IODP Expedition 302 Synthesis. Central European Journal of Geosciences 1, 157–175 (2009).
ADS Google Scholar
Brozena, J. M. et al. New aerogeophysical study of the Eurasia Basin and Lomonosov Ridge: Implications for basin development. Geology 31, 825–828 (2003).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Shephard, G. E., Muller, R. D. & Seton, M. The tectonic evolution of the Arctic since Pangea breakup: Integrating constraints from surface geology and geophysics with mantle structure.
Earth-Science Reviews 124, 148–183 (2013).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Backman, J. & Moran, K. Expanding the Cenozoic paleoceanographic record in the Central Arctic Ocean: IODP Expedition 302 Synthesis. Open Geosciences 157 p. (2009).
Lundin, E. R. & Dore, A. G. NE Atlantic break-up: a re-examination of the Iceland mantle plume model and the Atlantic–Arctic linkage. Geological Society, London, Petroleum Geology Conference
series 6, 739–754 (2005).
Article Google Scholar
Vogt, P. R., Taylor, P. T., Kovacs, L. C. & Johnson, G. L. Detailed aeromagnetic investigation of the Arctic Basin. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 84, 1071–1089 (1979).
Article Google Scholar
O’Regan, M. et al. Mid-Cenozoic tectonic and paleoenvironmental setting of the central Arctic Ocean. Paleoceanography 23, 1–5 (2008).
Google Scholar
Dixon, J., Dietrich, J. R. & McNeil, D. H. Upper Cretaceous to Pleistocene sequence stratigraphy of the Beaufort-Mackenzie and Banks Island areas, northwest Canada. Geological Survey of
Canada Bulletin 407 (1992).
McNeil, D. H. & Parsons, M. G. The Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum in the Arctic Beaufort-Mackenzie Basin- palynomorphs, carbon isotopes and benthic foraminiferal turnover. Bulletin of
Canadian Petroleum Geology 61, 157–186 (2013).
Article Google Scholar
Neville, L. A., McNeil, D. H., Grasby, S. E., Ardakani, O. H. & Sanei, H. Late Paleocene-middle Eocene hydrocarbon source rock potential in the Arctic Beaufort-Mackenzie Basin. Marine and
Petroleum Geology 86, 1082–1091 (2017).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Taylor, S. R. & McLennan, S. M. The Continental Crust: its Composition and Evolution. Blackwell: Oxford (1985).
Tribovillard, N., Algeo, T. J., Lyons, T. & Riboulleau, A. Trace metals as paleoredox and paleoproductivity proxies: An update. Chemical Geology 232, 12–32 (2006).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Dolby, G. Palynological Analysis of the 152–3520 M TD interval in the Natsek E-56 well, Beaufort Sea. National Energy Board Report, 8 (2011).
Nøhr-Hansen, H., Williams, G. L. & Fensome, R. A. Biostratigraphic correlation of the western and eastern margins of the Labrador-Baffin Seaway and implications for the regional geology.
Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland Bulletin 37, 74 (2016).
Google Scholar
Rai, V. & Rai, A. K. Growth behaviour of Azolla pinnata at various salinity levels and induction of high salt tolerance. Plant and Soil 206, 79–84 (1999).
Article Google Scholar
Melling, H. Sea ice of the northern Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 107, 1–21 (2002).
Article Google Scholar
Serreze, M. C. et al. Observational Evidence of Recent Change in the Northern High-Latitude Environment. Climatic Change 46, 159–207 (2000).
Article Google Scholar
Pagani, M. et al. Arctic hydrology during global warming at the Palaeocene/Eocene thermal maximum. Nature 442, 671–675 (2006).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Shellito, C. J., Lamarque, J.-F. & Sloan, L. C. Early Eocene Arctic climate sensitivity to pCO2 and basin geography. Geophysical Research Letters 36, 0.1029/2009GL037248 (2009).
Thomson, J. & Rogers, W. E. Swell and sea in the emerging Arctic Ocean. Geophysical Research Letters 41, 3136–3140 (2014).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Sepp, M. & Jaagus, J. Changes in the activity and tracks of Arctic cyclones. Climatic Change 105, 577–595 (2011).
Article Google Scholar
Bujak, J. P. & Bujak, A. The Arctic Azolla Event. Geoscientist 24, 10–15 (2014).
Google Scholar
Neville, L. A., McNeil, D. H., Grasby, S. E., Galloway, J. G. & Sanei, H. Rock-Eval Pyrolysis results for cuttings samples from the Natsek E-56 well, Beaufort-Mackenzie Basin, Canada.
Geological Survey of Canada Open File Report 7949 (2015).
Lafargue, E., Marquis, F. & Pillot, D. Rock-Eval 6 Applications in Hydrocarbon Exploration, Production, and Soil Contamination Studies. Rev Inst Fr Pét. 53, 421–437 (1998).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Behar, F., Beaumont, V. & De B. Penteado, H. L. Rock-Eval 6 Technology: Performances and Developments. Oil & Gas Science and Technology - Rev IFP, 56(2), 111–134 (2001)
Then, D. R. & Dougherty, B. J. A New Procedure For Extracting Foraminifera From Indurated Organic Shale. Current Research, Part B; Geological Survey of Canada Paper no 83-1B: 413–414 (1983).
McNeil, D. H. New foraminifera from the Upper Cretaceous and Cenozoic of the Beaufort-Mackenzie Basin of Arctic Canada. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication
Number 35 (1997).
Jakobsson, M. et al. The International Bathymetric Chart of the Arctic Ocean (IBCAO) Version 3.0, Geophysical Research Letters 39, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052219 (2012).
Download references
AcknowledgementsWe gratefully appreciate the enthusiasm and knowledge of the late Art Sweet on the life cycle and habitat of Azolla. K. Dewing provided expertise on the study region, R.A. Fensome assisted
interpreting the dinoflagellate cyst assemblage, J.R. Deitrich added interpretation of the seismic profile. Natural Resources Canada – Geoscience for Energy and Minerals Program.
Author informationAuthors and Affiliations Geological Survey of Canada, Natural Resources Canada, Calgary, Alberta, T2L 2A7, Canada
Lisa A. Neville, Stephen E. Grasby & David H. McNeil
AGAT Laboratories, Calgary, Alberta, T2E 7J2, Canada
Lisa A. Neville
AuthorsLisa A. NevilleView author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Stephen E. GrasbyView author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
David H. McNeilView author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
ContributionsL. Neville and D. McNeil conducted microfauna analyses, S. Grasby provided geochemical interpretation. All authors contributed to manuscript preparation.
Corresponding author Correspondence to Stephen E. Grasby.
Ethics declarations Competing InterestsThe authors declare no competing interests.
Additional informationPublisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary informationSupplementaryInformationRights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or
format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or
other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in
the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the
copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Reprints and permissions
About this articleCite this article Neville, L.A., Grasby, S.E. & McNeil, D.H. Limited freshwater cap in the Eocene Arctic Ocean. Sci Rep 9, 4226 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40591-w
Download citation
Received: 15 May 2018
Accepted: 04 February 2019
Published: 12 March 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40591-w
Share this article Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative