Reader TTS

ABSTRACT Sorting nexin 4 (SNX4) is an evolutionary conserved protein that mediates recycling from endosomes back to the plasma membrane in yeast and mammalian cells. SNX4 is expressed in the

brain. Altered protein levels are associated with Alzheimer’s disease, but the neuronal localization and function of SNX4 have not been addressed. Using a new antibody, endogenous neuronal

SNX4 co-localized with both early and recycling endosome markers, similar to the reported localization of SNX4 in non-neuronal cells. Neuronal SNX4 accumulated specifically in synaptic

areas, with a predominant localization to presynaptic terminals. Acute depletion of neuronal SNX4 using independent short hairpin RNAs did not affect the levels of the transferrin receptor,

a canonical SNX4 cargo. Quantitative mass spectrometry revealed that upon SNX4 knockdown the class of proteins involved in neurotransmission was the most dysregulated. This included integral

membrane proteins at both the presynaptic and postsynaptic side of the synapse that participate in diverse synaptic processes such as synapse assembly, neurotransmission and the synaptic

vesicle cycle. These data suggest that SNX4 is implicated in a variety of synaptic processes. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS SYNAPTIC AP2 CCV LIFE CYCLE REGULATION BY THE EPS15,

ITSN1, SGIP1/AP2, SYNAPTOJANIN1 INTERACTOME Article Open access 13 April 2021 TMEM16K IS AN INTERORGANELLE REGULATOR OF ENDOSOMAL SORTING Article Open access 03 July 2020 SYNAPTIC FUS

ACCUMULATION TRIGGERS EARLY MISREGULATION OF SYNAPTIC RNAS IN A MOUSE MODEL OF ALS Article Open access 21 May 2021 INTRODUCTION Sorting nexin 4 (SNX4) is an evolutionary conserved protein

that mediates endosomal recycling from endosomes back to the plasma membrane1,2. SNX4 is a member of the sorting nexin (SNX) family characterized by a phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate

binding domain (phox homology (PX) domain)3, which is necessary for peripheral membrane localization4,5. More specifically, SNX4 is part of the SNX- Bin/Amphiphysin/Rvs (BAR) subfamily

characterized by a carboxy-terminal BAR domain that binds to curved membranes upon dimerization4,6. SNX4 forms tubules that emanate from endosomes during the RAB5-RAB7 (early endosome to

late endosome) and RAB4-RAB11 (early recycling endosome to endosome recycling compartment) transition7. Hettema et al.8 showed that silencing the yeast homologue of SNX4 (Snx4p) decreases

the levels of Scn1p (an exocytic v-SNARE) at the plasma membrane and increases Scn1p degradation by the vacuole (the yeast equivalent of the mammalian lysosome)8. In HeLa cells, a similar

SNX4 pathway has been observed: SNX4 recycles the transferrin receptor (TFNR), an iron-transporting receptor, from endosomes to the plasma membrane thereby avoiding its lysosomal

degradation9. SNX4 is expressed in the brain and SNX4 protein levels are decreased by 70% in brains of severe Alzheimer’s disease (AD) cases10. Beta-secretase 1 (BACE-1) is an enzyme

involved in proteolytic processing of the amyloid precursor protein, which leads to the formation of the pathological amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide in AD11. Two recent studies indicated that SNX4

dysregulation mistargets BACE-1 to late endosomal compartments, which impacts Aβ production10,12. Hence, neuronal SNX4 dysregulation might be involved in Aβ production and AD aetiology.

While SNX4 has been associated with pathological mechanisms in the brain, the physiological role and subcellular distribution of SNX4 in neurons is currently unknown. Here, we characterized

the localization of endogenous SNX4 in primary mouse neurons using a new antibody. Endogenous SNX4 partially co-localized with both early and recycling endosome markers, which is in

accordance with the previously established role of SNX4 in non-neuronal cells. In contrast to non-neuronal cells, neuronal SNX4 depletion did not decrease the levels of the canonical SNX4

cargo TFNR9. Neuronal SNX4 accumulated specifically in synaptic areas, with a predominant localization to presynaptic terminals. Based on the dysregulation of membrane proteins in synaptic

terminals measured by quantitative mass spectrometry in SNX4 knockdown neurons, we propose that SNX4-dependent endosomal sorting is functionally relevant for synaptic terminals. RESULTS

NOVEL SNX4 ANTIBODY SPECIFICALLY LABELS ENDOGENOUS MOUSE SNX4 IN WESTERN BLOT AND IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY Commercially available antibodies against SNX4 only detect mouse SNX4 by western blot

(Supplementary Fig. S1). In order to characterize the subcellular localization of endogenous SNX4 in mouse neurons, we developed a novel antibody. This antibody was designed in collaboration

with Synaptic Systems (Cat. No. 392 003) against the N-terminal region of mouse SNX4 (Supplementary Fig. S1). To confirm that the antibody specifically detects SNX4, we developed three

independent short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) against SNX4 and rescue constructs in lentivirus. Cortical mouse neurons were infected with rescue SNX4 constructs at DIV3 (R1, R2 and R3) and at DIV7

with three shRNAs against SNX4 (shSNX4-1, shSNX4-2, and shSNX4-3) or an shRNA control (Control). At DIV14-15, the neurons were lysed or fixed and SNX4 levels were evaluated using western

blot or immunocytochemistry (Fig. 1). On western blot, the antibody detected a protein of ~ 50 kDa, which corresponds with the size of SNX4. The intensity of this band was decreased by all

three shRNAs against SNX4 and these levels were restored when shRNA was combined with the corresponding SNX4 rescue construct (Fig. 1a,b). SNX4 reduction was also verified by mass

spectrometry (Supplementary Table S2, Supplementary Fig. S10). The same ~ 50 kDa band was observed using two commercially available antibodies (Supplementary Fig. S1). Our new antibody also

detected a lower band of ~ 30 kDa in all samples that remained unaffected in neurons expressing shRNA against SNX4, suggesting that this antibody also binds an unspecific protein

(Supplementary Fig. S1). When probing homogenates derived from 7 distinct regions of the mouse brain, the ~ 50 kDa band appeared in all region samples tested (Supplementary Fig. S1),

suggesting that SNX4 is ubiquitously expressed in the mouse brain. To test the application of the new antibody in immunocytochemistry, DIV15 cortical neurons were labelled with antibodies

against SNX4 and synaptophysin-1 (a synaptic protein used as control) (Fig. 1c,d). mCherry reported the transfection of all shRNA constructs. Immunolabeling with the SNX4 antibody showed a

punctate pattern in murine primary neuron cultures (Fig. 1c). The total SNX4 signal intensity was decreased upon SNX4 knockdown and was restored when shRNAs were combined with their rescue

constructs (Fig. 1d–f). On the other hand, the total synaptophysin-1 intensity remained unchanged upon modulation of SNX4 levels (Fig. 1d–f). This indicates that the antibody signal was

specific for SNX4 in immunocytochemistry. Together, these data confirm that SNX4 is detected using the novel antibody both in western blot and immunocytochemistry. SNX4 IS LOCATED ON EARLY

AND RECYCLING ENDOSOMES IN NEURONS SNX4 colocalizes with early and recycling endosome markers in HeLa cells, where it coordinates recycling from early endosomes to the plasma membrane

through recycling endosomes9. To test if SNX4 also colocalizes with these endosome markers in neurons, hippocampal mouse neurons at DIV14-15 were fixed and labelled for endogenous SNX4 and

RAB5 (early endosome marker) or RAB11 (recycling endosome marker). The specificity of SNX4 localization to these endosome markers was assessed by including SNX4 knockdown (shSNX4-2). SNX4

colocalized with RAB5 signal (Pearson's coefficient 0.58), which dropped significantly upon SNX4 depletion (Pearson’s coefficient 0.41, Fig. 2a,c). The total neuronal levels of RAB5

were 19% decreased upon SNX4 knockdown (Fig. 2b), corresponding to the smaller size of RAB5 puncta (Supplementary Fig. S6). Expression of shSNX4-2 did not affect the total neuronal levels of

RAB11 (Fig. 2d,e). The Pearson’s coefficient for the colocalization between RAB11 signal and SNX4 signal was 0.45, which dropped to 0.31 upon SNX4 depletion (Fig. 2d,f). These data indicate

that endogenous SNX4 localizes to early and recycling endosomes in cultured primary mouse neurons. SNX4 LOCALIZES TO SYNAPTIC TERMINALS Immunoreactivity for SNX4 signal appeared to be

present in synapses (Fig. 1c). To confirm this, we analysed the colocalization between SNX4 and synaptic markers. Control and SNX4 knockdown hippocampal neurons at DIV14-15 were fixed and

labelled for SNX4 and synaptophysin-1(Fig. 3a). The Pearson’s coefficient for the colocalization between synaptophysin-1 signal and SNX4 signal was 0.71 (Fig. 3b). This value dropped to 0.55

upon SNX4 depletion (Fig. 3b). Similar effects were observed with the other two shRNAs against SNX4. The signal of SNX4 in synaptophysin-1 punctae was restored when the shRNAs were combined

with their rescue constructs (Supplementary Fig. S3). The localization of endogenous SNX4 to synaptic structures was confirmed using bassoon, a marker of the presynaptic active zone

(Supplementary Fig. S3). Taken together, these data demonstrate that SNX4 is targeted to synaptic locations. To investigate the distribution of SNX4 within the synapse, we blotted

subcellular fractions of the mouse hippocampus for SNX4 (Fig. 4a–e). SNX4 was detected in the synaptosome (SyS) fraction, corroborating a synaptic localization of SNX4. SNX4 was also present

in the synaptic membrane fraction (SyM), but was not enriched in the PSD fraction (PSD). As expected, the PSD fraction was highly enriched in PSD95 and depleted of VAMP2/synaptobrevin-2.

Therefore, the detection of SNX4 in hippocampal subcellular fractions is very similar to presynaptic markers such as VAMP2/synaptobrevin-2. To verify localization of SNX4 to specific

synaptic compartments, immuno-gold electron microscopy was performed using Protein A-gold 10 nm to detect the SNX4 antibody. The gold particles were observed inside presynaptic terminals and

on the postsynaptic membrane in close proximity to the postsynaptic density, but not within the postsynaptic density (Fig. 4f′,f′′,f′′′,f′′′′), in agreement with low SNX4 detection in the

PSD fraction. Quantitative analysis showed that the SNX4 immunosignal was more abundant in the presynaptic than postsynaptic terminal (Fig. 4g). Little synaptic signal was detected in the

negative controls (blocking peptide, Supplementary Fig. S4). Overall, these data show that SNX4 is present at both sides of the synapse, but is more abundant in presynaptic terminals. SNX4

DEPLETION DOES NOT ALTER NEURONAL TNFR NOR SYNAPTIC RAB11 LEVELS In non-neuronal cells, SNX4 depletion leads to an abnormal RAB11 distribution (from juxtanuclear to peripheral localization)

and missorting and degradation of TFNR that is recycled by RAB11-positive endosomes9. To test if this SNX4 recycling pathway is also critical to prevent TFNR degradation in neurons, we

measured the levels of TFNR upon SNX4 knockdown by western blot. Upon shSNX4 expression, TFNR levels were not changed by western blot (Fig. 5a–c, Supplementary Fig. S5) and by mass

spectrometry (Control = 1.00 ± 0.08, shSNX4-1 = 0.47 ± 0.05, shSNX4-2 = 1.39 ± 0.07 and 1.14 ± 0.07 a.u.) (see Supplementary Table S2 for details). As reported above, the total level of

RAB11 was not affected by SNX4 knockdown (Fig. 2e). However, the density of RAB11 endosomes in neurites was reduced while their size was increased by shSNX4-2 expression (Supplementary Fig.

S6c,d). Upon SNX4 depletion, no difference was observed in the colocalization of the synaptic marker synaptophysin-1 with the recycling endosome marker RAB11 nor in the intensity of RAB11

signal within the synaptophysin-1 punctae (Fig. 5d,e, Supplementary Fig. S6). Also, the synaptic density (number of synapses per µm of neurite) was not affected in neurons expressing shRNA

against SNX4 (Supplementary Fig. S7). These data indicate that the impact of SNX4 depletion on TFNR recycling and recycling endosomes is different in neurons compared to non-neuronal cells.

THE NEURONAL PROTEOME IS DYSREGULATED UPON SNX4 KNOCKDOWN To explore the function of neuronal SNX4, the proteome of SNX4 knockdown and control neurons was compared. Five independent cortical

neuron cultures were infected with control shRNA and three different shRNAs against SNX4 at DIV7. At DIV15, cells were harvested and the proteins were extracted and digested into peptides

for subsequent identification and quantification using LC–MS/MS13,14. A total of 2531 proteins were identified and quantified from 12,027 peptides. Only peptides identified with high

confidence were used (i.e., a Q-value ≤ 0.01 over all samples in at least one group, allowing for one outlier within each condition). The full list of proteins quantified in this study is

represented in Supplementary Table S2. Hierarchical clustering was used to classify samples into groups according to similarity. Biological replicates from the same experimental group

(control, shSNX4-1, shSNX4-2 and shSNX4-3) clustered together (Fig. 6a). This indicates that the expression of each individual SNX4-targetted shRNA results in a distinct and reproducible

neuronal proteome. Compared with control, 290, 167 and 283 proteins were dysregulated in shSNX4-1, shSNX4-2 and shSNX4-3 expressing neurons, respectively (Supplementary Fig. S8). Among the

134 significantly regulated proteins in at least 2 shRNAs, 4 were found up-regulated and 9 down-regulated in all knockdown groups (Fig. 6b). Although fold change was not a cut off criteria,

a 20% or higher degree of change was observed among the proteins significantly dysregulated in the same direction in the three shRNAs against SNX4 (the smaller change observed was a 24.55%

reduction in NSF equivalent to -0.463 log2, Supplementary Fig. S9). To further study the effect of SNX4 depletion on the neuronal proteome in an unbiased manner, we interrogated the 111

proteins significantly dysregulated in the same direction in at least two shRNAs using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA). The functional annotation indicated neurotransmission and synaptic

transmission as the most significant overrepresentation. Moreover, disease annotations such as severe psychological disorders, schizophrenia and mitochondrial disorder were enriched. In

addition, transport of molecules was among the 25 annotations with the lowest _p_ values, in line with the established protein sorting role of SNX4 (Fig. 6c). All the information generated

from the IPA analysis, including protein identities for each process, is shown in Supplementary Table S3. We further characterized the synaptic location and functions of the individual

synaptic proteins altered upon SNX4 depletion using SynGO15. From the 111 proteins significantly dysregulated in the same direction in at least two shRNAs, 30 were mapped to SynGO annotated

genes which are based on expert-curated literature evidence15 (Supplementary Table S4). Twenty-nine genes have a Cellular Component annotation, many of which encoded for _membrane integral_

proteins in different components of the _pre_ and _postsynapse_, suggesting that SNX4 functions in the sorting of synaptic membrane proteins (Fig. 6d, Supplementary Table S4). Twenty-two

genes were mapped for a wide variety of Biological Processes annotations which included _metabolism, synapses assembly_ in _organization_, _chemical transmission_ in _signaling_,

neurotransmitter levels (_NTR levels_) in _postsynapti_c, _exocytosis_ and _endocytosis_ in _synaptic vesicle cycle_ (_SV cycle_) in _presynaptic_ (Supplementary Fig. S10, Supplementary

Table S4), implicating SNX4 in a variety of synaptic processes. Taken together, SNX4 knockdown regulated the expression of multiple proteins involved in neurotransmission and related

diseases on both the pre- and postsynaptic side of the synapse. These experiments suggest that SNX4 plays a role in synaptic proteome regulation. DISCUSSION SNX4 localizes on early and

recycling endosomes in mitotic cells5,7,9,16,17. Also, in neurons, we found that SNX4 co-localized with early (RAB5) and recycling (RAB11) endosome markers, suggesting that neuronal SNX4

functions in the previously described recycling pathway from early endosome to the plasma membrane through the recycling endosome. In HeLa cells, SNX4 silencing leads to abnormal early and

recycling endosome distribution: A shift from juxtanuclear to peripheral distribution due to perturbation of early-to-recycling endosome transport9. Perhaps, a similar perturbation occurs in

neurons, since expression of shSNX4-2 decreased total RAB5 intensity and puncta size and decreased the density of RAB11 punctae while increasing their size (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig.

S6). The best described SNX4-dependent recycling cargo is TFNR, which is decreased upon SNX4 depletion in HeLa cells9. In neurons, SNX4 depletion did not decrease TFNR levels measured by

western blot or mass spectrometry (Fig. 5, Supplementary Table S2). Therefore, the impact of SNX4 depletion on TFNR levels in neurons is different compared to HeLa cells, but this does not

fully exclude that neuronal TFNR is recycled by SNX4. For example, SNX4-dependent cargo might not be degraded in lysosomes upon SNX4 depletion in neurons but instead mislocalize or

accumulate in internal compartments without affecting the total protein level. Nevertheless, SNX4-dependent recycling seems to be different in neurons, which may reflect a differential

demand of this pathway in these large, polarized, post-mitotic cells specialized in neurotransmission. In neurons, endogenous SNX4 highly colocalizes with synaptic markers (Fig. 3 and

Supplementary Table S1) and immuno-electron microscopy revealed that endogenous SNX4 is present in both pre- and postsynaptic terminals. In agreement with this synaptic localization,

explorative mass spectrometry showed that SNX4-targetted shRNA expression results in dysregulation of the neuronal proteome, including proteins involved in neurotransmission and associated

with severe psychological disorders (Fig. 6c). Many of the synaptic proteins dysregulated by SNX4 knockdown were mapped as integral membrane proteins at both sides of the synaptic terminal

(Fig. 6d). Given the established role of SNX4 in endosomal sorting of transmembrane proteins8,9, we speculate that SNX4 is involved in endosomal sorting of synaptic membrane proteins. On the

postsynaptic side, the endosomal system is involved in the insertion of integral neurotransmitter receptors in the plasma membrane, which is a mechanism of synaptic plasticity (see

review18). For example, depletion of the endosomal sorting protein VPS35 leads to decreased levels of glutamate receptors in the plasma membrane, reducing glutamatergic

neurotransmission19,20,21. The glutamate ionotropic receptor AMPA type subunit 1 (gene GRIA1, Supplementary Table S2, Supplementary Fig. S9) is downregulated by SNX4 knockdown. This suggests

that SNX4 may function in the same or a similar sorting pathway of glutamate receptors. In presynaptic terminals, the protein levels of calcium sensors such as the synaptic vesicle

component synaptotagmin-1 and the calcium dependent secretion activator CAPS1 are dysregulated upon SNX4-targetted shRNA expression (Supplementary Table S2, Supplementary Fig. S9). This

suggests that SNX4 may sort these membrane proteins in the presynaptic terminal to regulate calcium-dependent synaptic vesicle exocytosis. Furthermore, increased lysosomal degradation of

SNX4-dependent cargo has been described when SNX4 is depleted in non-neuronal cells9. The expression of the lysosomal proteins Cathepsin D and LAMP1 was found increased upon SNX4 depletion

in neurons, which suggest a higher demand for lysosomal degradation upon SNX4 knockdown (Supplementary Fig. S9). Uncovering synaptic SNX4 sorting pathways will provide insight into the

homeostasis of the local synaptic proteome, on which these distant synaptic terminals may rely. We found that SNX4 locates to synapses and that synaptic membrane proteins are dysregulated

upon SNX4 knockdown in neurons. This suggests that SNX4-dependent sorting is functionally relevant for synapses. However, the precise role of SNX4 in neurons and in particular in synapses

remains to be elucidated. Numerous hypotheses could emerge from our data. To enable this exploration, we provided the complete dataset in tabular format (Supplementary Table S2). The

proteomic analysis of SNX4-depleted neurons shows that each individual shRNA induces a reproducible but distinct dysregulation of the neuronal proteome (Fig. 6), which is difficult to

explain by the depletion of SNX4 alone. Likely, each shRNA against SNX4 affects a distinct SNX4-independent group of proteins, these so-called off-target effects are well described for shRNA

technology (see reviews22,23) Hence, validation of these hits, including a rescue experiment using shRNA-resistant constructs to assure that the effect depends on the target SNX4, is

recommended before further functional studies are undertaken. Notwithstanding these limitations, the localization of SNX4 at synaptic terminals opens new avenues for research into the role

of this protein at synapses, which may provide a better understanding of the local regulation of the synaptic proteome. MATERIALS AND METHODS PLASMIDS shRNAs were cloned into a lentiviral

expression vector under the U6 promotor. To report lentiviral infection, the plasmid also contained mCherry under the synapsin promotor. The target sequences of the shRNAs were as follows:

GGG AAT GAC TAC CAA ACT C (shSNX4-1), GCA GTG GAA TAG ATA CAT TAT (shSNX4-2), GCT GAT ATT GAA CGC TTC AAA (shSNX4-3), TTC TCC GAA CGT GTC ACG T (Control, scramble)24. Mouse SNX4 cDNA was

used to induce the silent point mutations in rescue constructs. The following forward primers were used: GAAGGGAATGACAACGAAGCTTTTTGGTCAAGAAACTCCAG (shSNX4-1) GGGCTGATATCGAGCGCTTTAAAGAACAAAAG

(shSNX4-3). LABORATORY ANIMALS Animal experiments were approved by the animal ethical committee of the VU University/VU University Medical Centre (“Dier ethische commissie (DEC)”; license

number: FGA 11-03) and are in accordance with institutional and Dutch governmental guidelines and regulations. PRIMARY CELL CULTURE Primary neurons were cultured from mouse E18 hippocampi or

cortices. Briefly, tissue was dissected in Hanks balance salt solution (HBSS, Sigma) with 10 mM HEPES (Life Technologies) and digested by 0.25% trypsin (20 min at 37 °C; Life technologies)

in HBSS. The tissue disociation was performed with fire-polished Pasteur pipettes in DMEM with FCS. The neurons were spun down and re-suspended in neurobasal medium with 2% B-27, 18 mM

HEPES, 0.25% glutamax and 0.1% Pen-Strep (Life Technologies). Neurons were plated on coverslips pre-coated with poly-L-ornithine (Sigma) and laminin (Sigma) or on an astrocyte monolayer.

Neurons were maintained at 37 °C and 5% CO2 until the day of the experiment. SUBCELLULAR FRACTIONING Subcellular fractions were obtained from hippocampi from three-month-old C57BL6 mice as

previously described25,26. Isolated hippocampi were homogenized on a dounce homogenizer (potterS; 12 strokes, 900 rpm) using homogenizer buffer (0.32 M Sucrose, 5 mM HEPES pH 7.4, Protease

inhibitor cocktail (Roche)), and spun at 1000×_g_ for 10 min at 4 °C to obtain Supernatant 1 (S1). S1 was centrifuged at 20,000×_g_ for 20 min to obtain pellet 2 (P2) and supernatant 2 (S2).

S2 was ultracentrifuged at 100,000×_g_ for 2 h to obtain the pellet containing the microsomal fraction (M). S1 was ultracentrifuged in a 0.85/1.2 M sucrose density gradient at 100,000×_g_

for 2 h to obtain Synaptosomes (SyS) at the interface of 0.85/1.2 M sucrose. SyS were exposed to a hypotonic shock of 5 mM HEPES pH 7.4 with protease inhibitor for 15 min, and sucrose

gradient ultracentrifuged as stated above to obtain the synaptic membrane fraction (SyM) at the interface of 0.85/1.2 M. SyS was also treated with 1% Tx-100 for 30 min, layered on top of

1.2/1.5/2 M sucrose, centrifuged at 100,000×_g_ for 2 h, to obtain the PSD fraction (PSD) at the interface of 1.5/2 M sucrose. WESTERN BLOT Wild type mouse brain regions were homogenized in

ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with protease inhibitors and lysed (100 µl Laemmli sample buffer (2% w/v sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 10% v/v Glycerol, 0.26 M β-mercaptoethanol, 60

 mM Tris–HCl pH 6.8, and 0.01% w/v bromophenolblue) per each mg). DIV14-15 cortical neurons were washed with ice-cold PBS, scraped, lysed in Laemmli sample buffer. Samples were boiled for 10

 min at 90 °C, loaded in SDS-PAGE (10% 1 mm acrylamide gel with 2,2,2-Trichloroethanol) and transferred into Polyvinylideenfluoride (PVDF) membranes (Bio-rad) (1 h, 0.3 mA, 4 °C). Membranes

were blocked using 2% milk (Merck) with 0.05% of normal goat serum (NGS) in PBS-T (PBS with 0.1% Tween-20), incubated overnight at 4 °C with the primary antibodies in PBS-T (Supplementary

Table S5), with secondary alkaline phosphatase-conjugated antibodies (1:10,000, Jackson ImmunoResearch) in PBS-T during 1 h at 4 °C and incubated 5 min with AttoPhos (Promega). Images were

acquired with a FLA-5000 fluorescent image analyzer (Fujifilm) and analysed with ImageJ Gel Analysis. IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY AND CONFOCAL IMAGING Neurons at DIV 14–15 were fixed with 2%

paraformaldehyde in PBS and cell culture medium for 10 min followed by 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. Then, neurons were washed, permeabilized with 0.5% Triton

X-100 for 5 min, blocked with 2% normal goat serum and 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 40 min, incubated for 1 h with primary antibodies (Supplementary Table S5), for 1 h with secondary

antibodies conjugated to Alexa dyes (1:1000, Molecular Probes) and mounted on microscope slides with Dabco-Mowiol at room temperature. Images were acquired using a Carl Zeiss LSM510 meta

confocal microscope with a Plan-Neofluar 40x/1.3 oil objective and a Nikon Eclipse Ti with 63x/1.4 oil objective controlled by NisElements 4.30 software. Imaging acquisition settings and

contrast were kept constant between the experimental conditions within each experiment. Colocalization was quantified Pearson’s coefficient which correlates the pixel intensity in both

channels and Manders’ colocalization coefficient which assesses the co-occurrence of the signal of both channels using pixel by pixel comparison by the JACoP plugin27,28 For quantification

of protein levels, intensity was measured inside a neuronal mask in ImageJ. ELECTRON MICROSCOPY Hippocampi of 2-month-old mice were fixed in 4% PFA with 0.1% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M PB and

embedded in increasing concentrations of gelatine at 37 °C (5 min 2% gelatine, 15 min 5% gelatine, 30 min 10% gelatine, 10 min 12% gelatine, 60 min 12% gelatine). The hippocampi were

infiltrated in 2.3 M sucrose at 4 °C and frozen in liquid nitrogen. 70 nm thick sections were obtained with a cryo-ultramicrotome (UC6, Leica), collected at − 120 °C in 1% methylcellulose

and 1.2 M sucrose and transferred onto formvar/carbon-coated copper mesh grids. The sections were washed with PBS at 37 °C, treated with 0.1% glycine, blocked with 0.1% of BSA and 0.1% cold

water fish gelatine, incubated for 2 h with SNX4 antibody in blocking solution (Supplementary Table S5) and for 1 h with Protein A-10 nm gold (1: 25, CMC, UMC Utrecht, Netherlands) at room

temperature. The sections were counterstained with 0.4% uranyl acetate in 1.8% methylcellulose on ice and imaged on a Tecnai 12 Biotwin transmission electron microscope (FEI company).

Synapses were recognized by the presence of ~ 40 nm-sized vesicles in the presynaptic compartment opposed by a densely stained membrane region on the postsynaptic compartment, indicative of

a postsynaptic density. PROTEOMICS DIV14-15 cortical neurons (500.000 neurons per sample) were prepared as previously described29. In brief, cells were washed and collected in ice cold PBS

with protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). Neurons were pelleted (5 min at 3000 g at 4 °C), lysed in Laemmli loading buffer, boiled at 90 °C for 5 min and incubated with acrylamide for 30 

min. In-gel digestion with Trypsin/Lys-C Mix solution (Promega) was performed overnight at 37 °C. The peptides were dried using a speedvac and stored at − 20 °C. The peptides were

re-dissolved in 2% acetonitrile/0.1% formic acid solution containing iRT reference peptides and injected into the Ultimate 3000 LC system. The peptides were trapped on a 5 mm C18 PepMap 100

column for 5 min and separated on a homemade 200 mm C18 Alltima column. The reverse phase liquid chromatography was performed by linearly increasing the acetonitrile concentration in the

mobile phase at a flow rate of 5 μL/min: from 5 to 22% in 88 min, to 25% at 98 min, to 40% at 108 min and to 95% in 2 min. The separated peptides were electro-sprayed into the TripleTOF 5600

MS (Sciex) with a micro-spray needle (at a voltage of 5500 V). The mass spectrometer was set in data-independent acquisition at high sensitivity and positive mode under the following

parameters: parent ion scan of 100 ms (mass range of 350–1250 Da), SWATH mass range between 450–770 m/z, SWATH window of 8 Da, MS/MS scan time of 80 ms per window (range 200–1800 Da),

collision energy for each window was determine for a 2 + ion centered upon the window, with a spread of 15 eV. Data was analysed using Spectronaut 8.030 and a spectral library created from

merging two data-dependent analyses of wild type hippocampal neuron cultures and hippocampal synaptosomes containing spike-in iRT peptides from Biognosys31. The retention time prediction was

set to dynamic iRT; the cross-run normalization based on total peak areas was enabled. Protein abundances were computed using Spectronaut normalized peak area, and Loess normalized using

the ‘normalizeCyclicLoess’ function from limma R package (fast method and 10 iterations)32. Proteins significantly dysregulated in the same direction in at least two shRNA against SNX4

expressing groups were imported into IPA for core analysis without user intervention. Direct and indirect relationships were considered for the analysis of all data sources, mutation and

species available with experimentally observed confidence level. Finally, these proteins were annotated using SynGO15. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Data are expressed as mean values ± standard error

of the mean (SEM). The Shapiro–Wilk normality test was used to evaluate the distribution of the data. Bartlett’s test was used to test homoscedasticity. When comparing two homoscedastic and

normal distributed groups, t-test was used. Other two-group comparisons were analysed by the Mann–Whitney test. When comparing more than two groups and the data were normally distributed

and homoscedastic, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used. Dunnett’s post-hoc tests were performed after a significant effect was detected by comparing the different knockdown

groups to the control. In case of comparing more than two groups and the data were not normality distributed and homoscedastic, the Kruskal–Wallis test was used with Dunn’s multiple

comparison test as post-hoc. For proteomic analysis, empirical Bayes moderated t-statistics with multiple testing correction by false discovery rate (FDR) was performed on log-transformed

protein abundances as implemented by the ‘eBayes’ and ‘topTable’ functions from limma R package. Proteins were considered significantly regulated with a FDR corrected _p_ value ≤ 0.01. When

_p_ values were lower than 0.05, significance was noted in the figure as: *_P_ < 0.05, **_P_ < 0.01, ***_P_ < 0.001, ****_P_ < 0.0001. DATA AVAILABILITY The datasets generated

and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on request. REFERENCES * Koumandou, V. L. _et al._ Evolutionary reconstruction of the retromer complex and

its function in _Trypanosoma brucei_. _J. Cell Sci._ 124, 1496–1509 (2011). CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * van Weering, J. R., Verkade, P. & Cullen, P. J. SNX-BAR

proteins in phosphoinositide-mediated, tubular-based endosomal sorting. _Semin. Cell Dev. Biol._ 21, 371–380 (2010). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Carlton, J., Bujny, M., Rutherford, A. &

Cullen, P. Sorting nexins–unifying trends and new perspectives. _Traffic_ 6, 75–82 (2005). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Cullen, P. J. Endosomal sorting and signalling: an emerging role for

sorting nexins. _Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol._ 9, 574–582 (2008). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Teasdale, R. D., David, L., Houghton, F., Karlsson, L. & Gleeson, P. A. A large family of

endosome-localized proteins related to sorting nexin 1. _Biochem. J._ 358, 7–16 (2001). CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Carlton, J. _et al._ Sorting nexin-1 mediates tubular

endosome-to-TGN transport through coincidence sensing of high-curvature membranes and 3-phosphoinositides. _Curr. Biol._ 14, 1791–1800 (2004). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * van Weering, J.

R., Verkade, P. & Cullen, P. J. SNX–BAR-mediated endosome tubulation is co-ordinated with endosome maturation. _Traffic_ 13, 94–107 (2012). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Hettema, E. H.,

Lewis, M. J., Black, M. W. & Pelham, H. R. Retromer and the sorting nexins Snx4/41/42 mediate distinct retrieval pathways from yeast endosomes. _EMBO J._ 22, 548–557 (2003). CAS  PubMed

  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Traer, C. J. _et al._ SNX4 coordinates endosomal sorting of TfnR with dynein-mediated transport into the endocytic recycling compartment. _Nat. Cell

Biol._ 9, 1370–1380 (2007). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Kim, N.-Y. _et al._ Sorting nexin-4 regulates β-amyloid production by modulating β-site-activating cleavage enzyme-1. _Alzheimers

Res. Ther._ 9, 4 (2017). PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Müller, U. C., Deller, T. & Korte, M. Not just amyloid: physiological functions of the amyloid precursor protein

family. _Nat. Rev. Neurosci_ 18, 281–298 (2017). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Toh, W. H., Chia, P. Z. C., Hossain, M. I. & Gleeson, P. A. GGA1 regulates signal-dependent sorting of BACE1 to

recycling endosomes, which moderates Aβ production. _Mol. Biol. Cell_ 29, 191–208 (2018). CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Gillet, L. C. _et al._ Targeted data extraction of

the MS/MS spectra generated by data-independent acquisition: a new concept for consistent and accurate proteome analysis. _Mol. Cell. Proteomics_ 11, O111.016717 (2012). PubMed  PubMed

Central  Google Scholar  * Koopmans, F., Ho, J. T., Smit, A. B. & Li, K. W. Comparative analyses of data independent acquisition mass spectrometric approaches: DIA, WiSIM-DIA, and

untargeted DIA. _Proteomics_ 18, 1700304 (2018). PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Koopmans, F. _et al._ SynGO: an evidence-based, expert-curated knowledge base for the synapse. _Neuron_

103, 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.05.002 (2019). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Leprince, C. _et al._ Sorting nexin 4 and amphiphysin 2, a new

partnership between endocytosis and intracellular trafficking. _J. Cell Sci._ 116, 1937–1948 (2003). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Solis, G. P. _et al._ Reggies/flotillins interact with

Rab11a and SNX4 at the tubulovesicular recycling compartment and function in transferrin receptor and E-cadherin trafficking. _Mol. Biol. Cell_ 24, 2689–2702 (2013). CAS  PubMed  PubMed

Central  Google Scholar  * Kneussel, M. & Hausrat, T. J. Postsynaptic neurotransmitter receptor reserve pools for synaptic potentiation. _Trends Neurosci._ 39, 170–182 (2016). CAS 

PubMed  Google Scholar  * Choy, R.W.-Y. _et al._ Retromer mediates a discrete route of local membrane delivery to dendrites. _Neuron_ 82, 55–62 (2014). CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google

Scholar  * Hussain, N. K., Diering, G. H., Sole, J., Anggono, V. & Huganir, R. L. Sorting Nexin 27 regulates basal and activity-dependent trafficking of AMPARs. _Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

USA_ 111, 11840–11845 (2014). ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Tian, Y. _et al._ VPS35-deficiency results in an impaired AMPA receptor trafficking and decreased dendritic spine

maturation. _Mol. Brain_ 8, 1 (2015). Google Scholar  * Kaelin, W. G. Use and abuse of RNAi to study mammalian gene function. _Science_ 337, 421–422 (2012). ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  * Fellmann, C. & Lowe, S. W. Stable RNA interference rules for silencing. _Nat. Cell Biol_ 16, 10–18 (2014). CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Zhang, L. _et

al._ Role of GluR1 in activity-dependent motor system development. _J. Neurosci._ 28, 9953–9968 (2008). CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Pandya, N. J. _et al._ Correlation

profiling of brain sub-cellular proteomes reveals co-assembly of synaptic proteins and subcellular distribution. _Sci. Rep._ 7, 12107 (2017). ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  *

Von Engelhardt, J. _et al._ CKAMP44: a brain-specific protein attenuating short-term synaptic plasticity in the dentate gyrus. _Science_ 327, 1518–1522 (2010). ADS  Google Scholar  * Barlow,

A. L., MacLeod, A., Noppen, S., Sanderson, J. & Guérin, C. J. Colocalization analysis in fluorescence micrographs: verification of a more accurate calculation of pearson’s correlation

coefficient. _Microsc. Microanal._ 16, 710–724 (2010). ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Bolte, S. & Cordelieres, F. A guided tour into subcellular colocalization analysis in light

microscopy. _J. Microsc._ 5(224), 213–232 (2006). MathSciNet  Google Scholar  * Gonzalez-Lozano, M. A., Koopmans, F., Paliukhovich, I., Smit, A. B. & Li, K. W. A fast and economical

sample preparation protocol for interaction proteomics analysis. _Proteomics_ 19, e1900027. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201900027 (2019). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Bruderer,

R. _et al._ Extending the limits of quantitative proteome profiling with data-independent acquisition and application to acetaminophen-treated three-dimensional liver microtissues. _Mol.

Cell. Proteomics_ 14, 1400–1410 (2015). CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * He, E. _et al._ MIR137 schizophrenia-associated locus controls synaptic function by regulating

synaptogenesis, synapse maturation and synaptic transmission. _Hum. Mol. Genet._ 27, 1879–1891 (2018). CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Ritchie, M. E. _et al._ limma powers

differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. _Nucl. Acids Res._ 43, e47–e47 (2015). PubMed  Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors

thank Prof. Dr. Matthijs Verhage and Prof. Dr. Peter J. Cullen, Dr Vera Wiersma and Mirjam Meulenbeld for their critical reading of the manuscript, Joke Wortel for housing and breeding the

mice, Frank den Oudsten and Desiree Schut for providing cell cultures, Robbert Zalm and Joost Hoetjes for cloning and lentiviral production, Rozemarijn Jongeneel for confocal analysis and

Joke Wortel and Marien P. Dekker for assistance with EM analysis. EM analysis was performed at the VU/VUmc EM facility (ZonMW 91111009). This work was supported by the EC under

FP7-PEOPLE-2013 (607508), Alzheimer Nederland (WE.03-2016-05) and the Alzheimer Association (AARG-17-498856). AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Department of Functional Genomics,

Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Sonia Vazquez-Sanchez & Alexarae Walfenzao * Department of Molecular

and Cellular Neurobiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Miguel A. Gonzalez-Lozano & Ka Wan Li *

Clinical Genetics, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Jan R. T. van

Weering Authors * Sonia Vazquez-Sanchez View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Miguel A. Gonzalez-Lozano View author publications You can also

search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Alexarae Walfenzao View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Ka Wan Li View author publications

You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Jan R. T. van Weering View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS S.V.S.

performed experiments and analysed the data. A.W. collected and analysed confocal images for the SNX4 colocalization studies. M.A.G.L. and K.W.L produced and critically discussed the

proteomic data. S.V.S. and J.R.T.vW. designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript with input of all authors. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Jan R. T. van Weering. ETHICS

DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing interests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER'S NOTE Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims

in published maps and institutional affiliations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLES. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This article is licensed

under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate

credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article

are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons

licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of

this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Vazquez-Sanchez, S., Gonzalez-Lozano, M.A., Walfenzao, A. _et

al._ The endosomal protein sorting nexin 4 is a synaptic protein. _Sci Rep_ 10, 18239 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74694-6 Download citation * Received: 05 May 2020 * Accepted:

29 September 2020 * Published: 26 October 2020 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74694-6 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this

content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative