The identity of belowground herbivores, not herbivore diversity, mediates impacts on plant productivity

The identity of belowground herbivores, not herbivore diversity, mediates impacts on plant productivity


Play all audios:


ABSTRACT Across many ecosystems, increases in species biodiversity generally results in greater resource acquisition by consumers. Few studies examining the impacts of consumer diversity on


resource capture have focused on terrestrial herbivores, however, especially taxa that feed belowground. Here we conducted field mesocosm experiments to examine the effects of variation in


species richness and composition within a community of wireworm herbivores on wheat plant productivity. Our experiments involved wireworm communities consisting of between one and three


species, with all possible combinations of species represented. We found that the presence of wireworms reduced plant biomass and seed viability, but wireworm species richness did not impact


these plant metrics. Species identity effects were strong, as two species, _Limonius californicus_ and _Selatosomus pruininus_, had significantly stronger impacts on plants compared to _L.


infuscatus_. Communities with either of the two most impactful species consistently had the greatest impact on wheat plants. The effects of wireworms were thus strongly dependent on the


particular species present rather than the overall diversity of the wireworm community. More broadly, our study supports the general finding that the identity of particular consumer species


within communities often has greater impacts on ecosystem functioning than species richness. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS TREE PHYTOCHEMICAL DIVERSITY AND HERBIVORY ARE HIGHER IN


THE TROPICS Article 27 June 2024 GLOBALLY CONSISTENT RESPONSE OF PLANT MICROBIOME DIVERSITY ACROSS HOSTS AND CONTINENTS TO SOIL NUTRIENTS AND HERBIVORES Article Open access 14 June 2023


EXOTIC PLANTS ACCUMULATE AND SHARE HERBIVORES YET DOMINATE COMMUNITIES VIA RAPID GROWTH Article Open access 11 May 2021 INTRODUCTION Across a diverse array of ecosystems, greater consumer


species richness generally increases the consumption of shared resources1,2,3,4,5. This positive relationship between biodiversity and resource capture is often attributed to one of two


mechanisms, species complementarity or species identity effects4,5,6,7. Species complementarity occurs when consumer species feed on unique resources in space or time, such that more diverse


communities consume more resources by feeding across diverse niches4,5,6,7. Species identity effects or ‘sampling effects’, in contrast, arise when more species-rich communities are more


likely to contain highly impactful (i.e., species that consume significantly more resources than an average species) species by chance alone, resulting in greater resource


consumption4,5,6,7. One approach to demonstrate complementarity among consumer species is to explore the niche breadth of each species and identify unique niches available to each8; if


species occupy distinct niches, complementarity can occur8. Another approach is to directly manipulate niche complementarity among consumers, and experimentally determine if greater


complementarity promotes resource consumption9,10. Both of these approaches, however, require complex experimental designs that are often not practical for many systems. A more common


approach is to compare resource consumption in diverse consumer communities with that of the single most impactful species6,7. With this approach, if the diverse consumer community


significantly depletes resource levels below that of the most impactful species, complementarity is inferred6,7, but if not then identity effects are inferred. While empirical studies of


consumer diversity and resource consumption have identified both species complementarity and identity effects1,2,3,4,5, meta-analyses have shown that species identity effects are more


prevalent1. To date, however, studies on the consumer diversity-resource consumption relationship have focused almost exclusively on predator-prey or aquatic systems1. Few studies have


focused on interactions between herbivore diversity and plant productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Thus, whether patterns of diversity strengthening resource consumption seen in


predator-prey1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 and aquatic13,14,15,16 systems, and the underlying mechanisms, hold for terrestrial herbivore-plant systems remains largely unknown. Here we


investigated the relationship between herbivore diversity and plant productivity in a system consisting of wireworms and wheat plants. Wireworms, the larvae of click beetles (Coleoptera:


Elateridae), are a group of generalist herbivores that feed voraciously belowground on the seeds, roots, and stems of wild and cultivated plants. Wireworms cause significant economic damage


to crops and natural systems across a wide range of climates17,18,19,20. In wheat cropping systems of the Pacific Northwestern United States, wireworms have become the most economically


damaging insect pest18,19. The distribution of wireworm species, and the composition of wireworm communities, varies considerably across regions based on environmental conditions and crop


type17,18. In agricultural ecosystems, for example, many fields often contain a single wireworm species, while others in the same region contain a diverse mixture of species (although the


mechanisms driving this variability remain largely unknown)18. However, despite this variability, the impact of variation in wireworm species diversity and identity on plants remains


virtually unknown, although there is reason to expect that this variability is biologically important. For example, wireworm species can differ greatly in their feeding ecology17,19,20.


Different species can feed at varying depths within the soil profile18, which might lead to spatial niche partitioning between species. Moreover, different species vary in their seasonal


activity patterns17,19,20, which might promote temporal niche partitioning among species. Thus, we hypothesized that greater wireworm diversity might increase plant resource consumption


through spatial and/or temporal niche partitioning. We conducted a field mesocosm experiment to test whether the diversity and composition of wireworm communities mediated their impacts on


wheat plant productivity. Our experiments involved the three most common species in agricultural fields of Washington State, USA; these species accounted for nearly 90% of wireworms


collected in regional surveys of 160 fields throughout the Pacific Northwest18. These three species are responsible for inflicting significant economic damage to cereal crops in the Pacific


Northwest, with up to 70% yield losses in highly infested fields18. We tested whether the impacts of the three wireworm species on wheat plants differed when they were present singly or in


diverse communities. By using a substitutive experimental design we also isolated and measured wireworm identity and diversity effects. Our results shed light on the effects of belowground


herbivore diversity and species identity on plant productivity. RESULTS EFFECTS OF HERBIVORE PRESENCE AND DIVERSITY ON WHEAT PRODUCTIVITY We conducted a field mesocosm experiment to


determine the impacts of wireworm species richness and identity on wheat plant productivity. The presence of wireworms significantly reduced plant biomass both above- and belowground (Fig.


1A,B; Table 1). Seed viability was also significantly reduced when wireworms were present (Fig. 2A; Table 1). Other metrics of plant productivity (the number of produced seed heads, grain


weight) were not significantly impacted by the presence of wireworms (Figs 1 and 2; Table 1). While the presence of wireworms strongly impacted plant productivity, wireworm species richness


did not significantly impact aboveground (Fig. 1A; Table 1) or root biomass (Fig. 1B; Table 1). Seed viability, however, was significantly reduced when wireworms were present as single


species compared to within diverse communities (Fig. 2A; Table 1). The number of produced seed heads and grain weight were not significantly impacted by wireworm species richness (Figs 1 and


2; Table 1). EXAMINING EFFECTS OF WIREWORM SPECIES IDENTITY AND COMPLEMENTARITY We compared the impacts of single wireworm species to diverse communities on wheat plants to determine if


variation across our treatments was due to species identity or complementarity effects. We found no significant differences between observed plant productivity in diverse communities and the


expected productivity based on the averages of each wireworm species present singly (Table 2). This provides further evidence that wireworm diversity did not impact plant productivity.


However, we found that two wireworm species, _L. californicus_ and _S. pruininus_, had significantly greater negative impacts on plant productivity when present alone or in a two-species


community with only these two species, compared to other wireworm compositions (Table 2, Figs 3, 4, 5 and 6). We observed significant species identity effects for above- and belowground


biomass, the number of produced seed heads, seed viability, and grain weight (Table 2). For each of these metrics, _L. infuscatus_ was the least impactful species, while _L. californicus_


and _S. pruininus_ were significantly more impactful when present alone or in a two-species community without _L. infuscatus_ (Figs 3, 4, 5 and 6). Two-species communities with _L.


infuscatus_ and either _L. californicus_ or _S. pruininus_ consistently had significantly lower impacts than communities with _L. californicus_ and _S. pruininus_ (Figs 3, 4, 5 and 6).


DISCUSSION Over the past several decades a considerable amount of empirical research has focused on the effects of species diversity on ecosystem functioning1,2,3,4,5. Studies investigating


consumer diversity and resource capture have generally demonstrated strong positive impacts of diversity, although more evidence exists for species identity effects than complementarity as


the primary underlying mechanism1. For example, numerous multi-predator studies have found that greater predator diversity enhances the suppression of prey resources because the most


voracious predators are more likely to be present in diverse compared with simple communities1,4,21. The biodiversity of aquatic herbivores has also been shown to generally promote


consumption of plant tissue due to strong identity effects13,14,15,16. However, to date few studies have examined effects of the diversity of terrestrial consumer communities on plant


consumption. Our results show that the identity of herbivorous wireworm species mediated impacts on wheat productivity. Wireworms were impactful herbivores in our experiments, reducing plant


biomass and reproductive capacity. These direct impacts on yield observed here might be further magnified in the field situations, as plants with less developed root systems are more


susceptible to lodging22, an indirect effect of wireworm feeding. However, we did not find that wireworm diversity increased the depletion of wheat plant resources. Rather, two impactful


wireworm species, _L. californicus_ and _S. pruininus,_ caused greater deleterious effects on wheat productivity compared to diverse communities or a third species, _L. infuscatus_.


Moreover, two-species communities containing both _L. californicus_ and _S. pruininus_ exerted stronger deleterious effects on multiple plant productivity metrics than other diverse


communities that included _L. infuscatus_. The initial abundance of _L. californicus_ and _S. pruininus_ was lower in the two- or three-species communities containing _L. infuscatus_ due to


our substitutive design, which may have in turn weakened impacts on plants. Previous work shows that the distribution of wireworm species, and the composition of wireworm communities,


differs considerably across agroecosystems of the Pacific Northwestern United States based on environmental variation18,19. Although little is known about the feeding ecology of _S.


pruininus_, _L. californicus_ and _L. infuscatus_ differ significantly in their feeding modes19. _Limonius infuscatus_ actively feeds on wheat plants primarily from seeding (typically April


or May) through the month of June, after which it declines in activity (although some feeding occurs throughout the season), whereas _L. californicus_ larvae remain highly active for the


entire season, from seeding through harvest (typically August or September)19. We thus expected that temporal niche partitioning between different wireworm species might lead to stronger


impacts on plants when wireworms were present in diverse communities. Different wireworm species also can feed at varying depths within the soil profile19, which could promote spatial niche


partitioning when wireworms were present in diverse communities. However, we found that the biodiversity of wireworm communities did not increase depletion of wheat plant resources in our


mesocosms. It is possible that the nature of our mesocosms, which contained only a single plant species as resource, obscured potential complementarity between wireworm species. Previous


work in predator-prey systems, for example, has shown that the diversity of the resource base can have considerable impacts on the biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationship. In a


system with predators feeding on aphids on collard plants, for example, coccinellid beetles forage on leaf edges while parasitoid wasps forage on leaf centers, leading to spatial


complementarity and a positive relationship between predator diversity and aphid consumption10. However, when caterpillars are introduced to the system this complementarity is reduced


because caterpillars chew holes in leaf centers (creating edges for coccinellids), and species identity effects become prevalent due to increased niche overlap between predators10.


Similarly, Finke and Snyder9 demonstrated positive effects of consumer complementarity on resource consumption only when the resource base was diverse. In that study, the authors took


advantage of host fidelity between parasitoid wasps and aphids, which allowed them to independently manipulate predator niche breadth (generalists vs. specialists) and resource (aphid)


diversity. They found that resource exploitation increased only with greater diversity of specialist parasitoids when different species consumed different aphid species, demonstrating strong


complementary effects9. Conversely, our study manifested a high degree of niche overlap due to the presence of a single plant resource, potentially diminishing the ability of wireworms to


partition resources. However, further research should be carried out in order to verify such hypothesis. Our results support large-scale field trials showing that _L. californicus_ is a more


damaging species for commercial wheat producers in the Pacific Northwestern United States than _L. infuscatus_23. _Limonius californicus_ feeds actively throughout the season, while _L.


infuscatus_ is limited in activity to early months, which could contribute to the greater damage potential of _L. californicus_ over the course of an entire growing season. _L. californicus_


is also less impacted by seed-applied insecticides than _L. infuscatus_19,23, which can lead to greater damage caused by _L. californicus._ It remains unclear, however, whether _S.


pruininus_ causes more or less damage to commercial wheat crops than the two _Limonius_ species. This is because the _Limonius spp._ were believed to be the primary economically important


species in the Pacific Northwest23, and thus research to date focused primarily on these species. Only recently, when large-scale surveys were performed throughout this region, was _S.


pruininus_ discovered in high abundance18; however, detailed studies of the economic significance of this pest have yet to be performed and were one motivating reason for this study.


However, the spatial distribution of wireworm species tends to remain fairly consistent within fields over multiple seasons18. Sampling can thus provide producers with a reliable indicator


of which species to expect in order to guide management. While our results suggest that _L. californicus_ and _S. pruininus_ likely require more aggressive management than _L. infuscatus_,


our experiments were conducted at a single level of wireworm abundance. Variation in wireworm abundance, in conjunction with the species present, would likely ultimately dictate the most


successful management strategy. Indeed, studies of consumer diversity and resource consumption have shown that abundance may mediate the impacts of biodiversity8. When abundance of consumers


is low, competition is relaxed and the impacts of diversity might be marginalized because there may be enough resources available even for species competing in the same niche. However, when


consumer density is high, resource competition intensifies and only species that occupy distinct niches will contribute additively to resource consumption (i.e., a positive effect of


biodiversity can occur)8. It is possible that at higher wireworm densities we would have observed stronger diversity effects than were observed here. Future work should attempt to determine


how field-level variation in wireworm abundance, diversity, and species composition mediate the productivity of wheat and other commercial crops. Our results are in line with the broader


literature on relationships between consumer biodiversity and resource acquisition which shows that the identity of herbivores is critical for plant performance and abundance1. Herbivorous


wireworms likely pose greater threats to wheat production when communities consist of a single dominant consumer species (_L. californicus_ or _S. pruininus_) or the right mixture of species


(e.g., _L. californicus_ and _S. pruininus_) rather than a complex of multiple species or a less impactful species (_L. infuscatus_). More studies of terrestrial herbivores would be


beneficial to place our research in a broader context, but such studies are still under-represented in the literature1. Further examining the relationship between herbivore diversity and


plant productivity in natural and managed ecosystems would provide considerable benefits for our understanding of the functioning of terrestrial ecosystems and for the development of


integrated pest management strategies. METHODS EXPERIMENTAL SETUP We conducted a field mesocosm experiment to evaluate the impacts of three wireworm species, _L. infuscatus_, _L.


californicus_, and _Selatosomus pruininus_ on wheat plants, _Triticum aestivum_. Wheat is a predominant crop grown in the Pacific Northwestern United States and a highly suitable host for


wireworms18,19,23. The experiment was conducted at the Washington State University Tukey Orchard in Pullman, Washington, USA. Experimental units were plastic containers (60 cm long, 45 cm


wide, 40 cm deep) with small drainage holes (0.3 mm in diameter) drilled in the bottom to allow water drainage. These holes are small enough that they prevented the escape of wireworms.


Cages were installed in the ground, leveling the top of the container with the soil surface, and filled with previously excavated soil. Wheat seeds (variety Louise) used in the experiments


were commercially purchased. All plants were sown in growth chambers for 7d (Feekes’ growth stage 1) with a 16:8 h light:dark period at a light intensity of 600 μE m−2 s−1 and a temperature


regime of 20:18 °C (light:dark)24,25. They were then transplanted to the field mesocosms on May 7th, 2014 and allowed 3d to acclimate before wireworms were added. Each container received 10


wheat plants (2 rows of 5 plants) with in-row and between-row spacing of 8 and 20 cm, respectively. Plants were watered every 2 to 3d throughout the experiment. After wheat plants had


acclimated, we added wireworms to cages with the the following treatments that varied in species richness and composition: (1) control (six replicates without wireworms), (2) one wireworm


species (six replicates of each of the three species present alone), (3) two wireworm species (six replicates of each of the three unique species pairs), and (4) three wireworm species


(twelve replicates with all three wireworm species). We thus fully replicated all possible combinations of species composition and diversity from our community of three species. Wireworms


used in our experiments were field collected within 2 wk of the initiation of the experiments using bait traps18 and identified to species26,27. Larvae were collected from fallowed field sat


Washington State University Wilke Research and Extension Farm, Davenport, WA and Washington State University Lind Dryland Research Station, Lind, WA. All wireworms were housed without food


for 10d before introducing them to field mesocosms. Twelve randomly chosen large larvae (> = 9 mm in size) were assigned to each experimental mesocosms; this density is within the normal


range observed in fields reporting yield loss from wireworms19. Single-species treatments received 12 individuals of a single species, two-species treatments received 6 individuals of each


of the two wireworm species, and three-species treatments included 4 individuals of each of the three wireworm species. This substitutive design allowed us to vary species composition and


diversity with the same overall abundance in each mesocosm. Each experimental unit was maintained until the wheat was mature and ready to harvest. DATA COLLECTION Plants were harvested on


September 27th 2014 and the following five measures of plant productivity were measured: (1) aboveground dry weight (shoot dry weight), (2) belowground dry weight (root dry weight), (3) the


number of produced seed heads, (4) seed viability, and (5) grain weight. All plants were first harvested at the base near the soil. The aboveground matter was collected and the number of


produced seed heads was counted. The samples were then dried in an oven at 100 °C for 48 h and weighed. To calculate grain weight, all seeds from each plant were weighed28. Ten randomly


selected seeds were then germinated on blotter paper, moistened with tap water, and placed in a growth chamber at 20 °C for 7d, after which seed viability (% germination) was assessed in


accordance with procedures developed by the Association of Official Seed Analysts (AOSA)29. Only viable seedlings were counted30. To record root-biomass, we extracted root cores from the


soil by sifting all the soil out of each mesocosm and washing the residual soil off with water. All roots were then air-dried for 2 h and sorted between paper towels for accurate biomass


determination. Prepared samples were oven-dried at 100 °C for 48 h and then weighed. DATA ANALYSES We first analyzed the effect of wireworm presence on plant productivity using


non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum tests due to non-normality in the response variables. In these analyses wireworm presence (present or absent) was our explanatory variable and each metric of


plant productivity (except seed viability) was analyzed separately as a response. This allowed us to determine whether wireworms impacted plant productivity across all levels of composition


and diversity. We then used non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis tests31, followed by posthoc Dunn’s tests, to assess whether wireworm richness (1, 2, or 3 species) impacted each plant


productivity metric except seed viability. To analyze impacts of wireworm presence and biodiversity on seed viability we used logistic regression models, where seed germination (yes or no)


was the binary response. For all of these analyses, when the overall model was significant, comparisons of treatment means were performed using posthoc pairwise likelihood ratio contrasts.


These analyses were conducted in JMP32. To assess whether species complementarity or species identity effects were predominant, for each unique diverse assemblage _j_ we measured


non-transgressive (_D__T_) and transgressive (_D__max_) over-yielding as follows7: where _O__j_ is the observed plant productivity in the diverse community _j_, _E__j_ is the expected plant


productivity of the diverse community _j_ (the average productivity across all species in the community), and _M_ is the plant productivity in the monoculture that had the most impactful


species (in our case the wireworm species that caused the most damage to wheat). Separate analyses were conducted for each metric of plant productivity. Non-transgressive overyielding


indicates that plant productivity observed in a diverse wireworm community differed from the average productivity when these species were present singly; _D__T_ thus indicates the net impact


of diversity7. If _D__T_ values are significantly below 0, it indicates that diverse wireworm communities reduced plant productivity more than species present alone; _D__T_ values greater


than 0 would indicate that diverse communities had significantly lower impact on plant productivity than single wireworm species. Transgressive overyielding, _D__max_, occurs when the


effects of a diverse community exceeds that of the most impactful species. In this case, if _D__max_ values are significantly below 0, it indicates that diverse wireworm communities reduced


plant productivity more than the single most impactful species present alone (i.e., transgressive overyielding occurs); _D__max_ values significantly greater than 0 would indicate that the


single most impactful species had greater impacts on plant productivity than a diverse community (i.e., species identity effects predominate). If both _D__T_ are _D__max_ are significantly


negative, it would indicate a positive effect of diversity driven by species complementarity. If _D__T_ is significantly negative but _D__max_ is insignificant, it would indicate a positive


effect of diversity driven by a species identity effect. In contrast, if _D__max_ is significantly positive but _D__T_ is not significant, it would indicate that species identity effects


mediated impacts of wireworms on plant productivity (such that the single most impactful species exerted stronger detrimental effects on plant community than the diverse community) but that


diversity itself was not significant. We calculated _D__T_ and _D__max_ for each plant productivity metric (including seed viability which was treated as a percentage). We then used


one-sample _t_-tests to assess whether the distribution of these values calculated across all of the unique two- and three-species communities differed significantly from 0. This analysis


allowed us to detect if overyielding occurred, and whether species identity played a dominant role in wireworm communities. These analyses were conducted in JMP32. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HOW


TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Milosavljević, I. _et al_. The identity of belowground herbivores, not herbivore diversity, mediates impacts on plant productivity. _Sci. Rep._ 6, 39629; doi:


10.1038/srep39629 (2016). PUBLISHER'S NOTE: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. REFERENCES *


Cardinale, B. J. et al. Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems. Nature 443, 989–992 (2006). Article  CAS  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Crowder, D. W.,


Northfield, T. D., Strand, M. R. & Snyder, W. E. Organic agriculture promotes evenness and natural pest control. Nature 466, 109–112 (2010). Article  CAS  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar  *


Letourneau, D. K., Jedlicka, J. A., Bothwell, S. G. & Moreno, C. R. Effects of natural enemy biodiversity on the suppression of arthropod herbivores in terrestrial ecosystems. Annu Rev.


Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 573–592 (2009). Article  Google Scholar  * Crowder, D. W. & Jabbour, R. Relationships between biodiversity and biological control in agroecosystems: current status


and future challenges. Biol. Control 75, 8–17 (2014). Article  Google Scholar  * Loreau, M. et al. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science


294, 804–808 (2001). Article  CAS  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Loreau, M. & Hector, A. Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 412, 72–76


(2001). Article  CAS  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Petchey, O. L. Integrating methods that investigate how complementarity influences ecosystem functioning. Oikos 101, 323–330 (2003).


Article  Google Scholar  * Northfield, T. D., Snyder, G. B., Ives, A. R. & Snyder, W. E. Niche saturation reveals resource partitioning among consumers. Ecol. Lett. 13, 338–348 (2010).


Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Finke, D. L. & Snyder, W. E. Niche partitioning increases resource exploitation by diverse communities. Science 321, 1488–1490 (2008). Article  CAS 


ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Gable, J. T., Crowder, D. W., Northfield, T. D., Steffan, S. A. & Snyder, W. E. Niche engineering reveals complementary resource use. Ecology 93, 1994–2000


(2012). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Cardinale, B. J., Harvey, C. T., Gross, K. & Ives, A. R. Biodiversity and biocontrol: emergent impacts of a multi-enemy assemblage on pest


suppression and crop yield in an agroecosystem. Ecol. Lett. 6, 857–865 (2003). Article  Google Scholar  * Snyder, W. E., Snyder, G. B., Finke, D. L. & Straub, C. S. Predator biodiversity


strengthens herbivore suppression. Ecol. Lett. 9, 789–796 (2006). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Fox, J. W. Effects of algal and herbivore diversity on the partitioning of biomass


within and among trophic levels. Ecology 85, 549–559 (2004). Article  Google Scholar  * Wojdak, J. M. Relative strength of top-down, bottom-up, and consumer species richness effects on pond


ecosystems. Ecol. Monogr. 75, 489–504 (2005). Article  Google Scholar  * Norberg, J. Resource-niche complementarity and autotrophic compensation determines ecosystem-level responses to


increased cladoceran species richness. Oecologia 122, 264–272 (2000). Article  CAS  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Steiner, C. F. et al. The influence of consumer diversity and indirect


facilitation on trophic level biomass and stability. Oikos 110, 556–566 (2005). Article  Google Scholar  * Traugott, M., Benefer, C. M., Blackshaw, R. P., van Herk, W. G. & Vernon, R. S.


Biology, ecology, and control of elaterid beetles in agricultural land. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 60, 313–334 (2015). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Milosavljević, I., Esser, A. D. &


Crowder, D. W. Effects of environmental and agronomic factors on soil-dwelling pest communities in cereal crops. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 225, 192–198 (2016). Article  Google Scholar  *


Milosavljević, I., Esser, A. D. & Crowder, D. W. Seasonal population dynamics of wireworms in wheat crops in the Pacific Northwestern United States. J. Pest Sci. in press doi:


10.1007/s10340-016-0750-y (2016). * Traugott, M., Schallhart, N., Kaufmann, R. & Juen, A. The feeding ecology of elaterid larvae in central European arable land: new perspectives based


on naturally occurring stable isotopes. Soil Biol. Biochem. 40, 342–349 (2008). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Straub, C. S. & Snyder, W. E. Species identity dominates the relationship


between predator biodiversity and herbivore suppression. Ecology 87, 277–282 (2006). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Wu, W. & Bao-Luo, M. A new method for assessing plant lodging and


the impact of management options on lodging in canola crop production. Scientific Reports 6, 31890 (2016). Article  CAS  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Esser, A. D.,


Milosavljević, I. & Crowder, D. W. Effects of neonicotinoids and crop rotation for managing wireworms in wheat crops. J. Econ. Entomol. 108, 1786–1794 (2015). Article  CAS  PubMed 


Google Scholar  * Anand, A. et al. Greenhouse and field testing of transgenic wheat plants stably expressing genes for thaumatin-like protein, chitinase and glucanase against _Fusarium


graminearum_. J. Exp. Bot. 54, 1101–1111 (2003). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Large, E. C. Growth stages in cereals illustration of the Feekes scale. Plant Pathol. 3, 128–129


(1954). Article  Google Scholar  * Glen, R., King, K. M. & Arnason, A. P. The identification of wireworms of economic importance in Canada. Can. J. Res. 21, 358–387 (1943). Article 


Google Scholar  * Lanchester, H. P. Larval determination of six economic species of Limonius (Coleoptera: Elateridae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 39, 619–626 (1946). Article  Google Scholar  *


Yadav, R. S., Hash, C. T., Bidinger, F. R., Cavan, G. P. & Howarth, C. J. Quantitative trait loci associated with traits determining grain and stover yield in pearl millet under terminal


drought-stress conditions. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104, 67–83 (2002). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Association of Official Seed Analysts. Rules for testing seeds. Lincoln, NE (2000).


* Association of Official Seed Analysts. Seedling evaluation handbook. Publ. no. 35. Lincoln, NE (1992). * Lantz, B. The impact of sample non-normality on ANOVA and alternative methods. Br.


J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 66, 224–244 (2013). Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  PubMed  Google Scholar  * SAS Institute, JMP®, version 11. SAS Institute, Cary, NC (2013). Download references


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank Kayla Fillion, Jacob Cohen, Laura Rafferty, Isabel Brofsky, Derek Appel, Deb Pehrson, and Cameron Burt for technical assistance. Special thanks go to Arron H.


Carter and Walter S. Sheppard for their comments on the manuscript. This project was supported by grants from the Washington Grain Commission and the USDA NIFA, award 2016-70006-25829, to DC


and AE. AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Washington State University Entomology, 166 FSHN Bldg, Pullman, 99164, WA, USA Ivan Milosavljević & David W. Crowder * Washington


State University Extension, 205 W Main, Ritzville, 99169, WA, USA Aaron D. Esser * Department of Plant, Soil and Entomological Sciences, University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Drive, Moscow,


83844-2339, ID, USA Nilsa A. Bosque-Pérez Authors * Ivan Milosavljević View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Aaron D. Esser View author


publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Nilsa A. Bosque-Pérez View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * David


W. Crowder View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS I.M., A.E., N.B.P., and D.C. designed the research. I.M. and A.E. conducted the


experiments. I.M. and D.C. analyzed the data. I.M. wrote the manuscript with edits from A.E., N.B.P., and D.C. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing


financial interests. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are


included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to


obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS


ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Milosavljević, I., Esser, A., Bosque-Pérez, N. _et al._ The identity of belowground herbivores, not herbivore diversity, mediates impacts on plant productivity.


_Sci Rep_ 6, 39629 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39629 Download citation * Received: 18 May 2016 * Accepted: 25 November 2016 * Published: 22 December 2016 * DOI:


https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39629 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently


available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative