Reader TTS

Urban development in the Indian context is, effectively, an unplanned amoebic expansion of housing and commercial spaces. The faultlines are documented. A 2021 report of the ministry of

housing and urban affairs observes, “Floodplains in Indian cities are very much exposed to unauthorised construction, which has taken place without preparation and approval of layout plans.”

 Flooding is a result of poor retrofitting of policy and facilities such as drainage. Add to this the inadequacies of waste management, poor desilting, the inefficiencies haunting urban

local bodies and lack of capacity. In 2014, the BJP manifesto promised the construction of 100 new cities. That was replaced with a promise of Smart Cities launched in June 2015. The

mission: to promote cities that provide core infrastructure, clean and sustainable environment, and give a decent quality of life to their citizens through the application of ‘smart

solutions’. How has that panned out? The Smart Cities Mission (SCM) covered 100 cities. As per data provided in parliament, 8,063 projects costing over Rs 1,64,545 crore were taken up, and

7,504 projects costing over Rs 1,50,306 crore were completed. It is arguable that this spend should have included provision of infrastructure to prevent flooding. But cities continue to be

flooded. The SCM was supplemented by another scheme called AMRUT, launched in 2015 to cover 500 cities and towns. The mission: development of basic infrastructure. The thrust areas: water

supply, sewage and septage management, storm-water drains to reduce flooding, besides public transport and enhancement of amenities. Under AMRUT, over 6,000 projects worth Rs 83,578 crore

were taken up. What was the spending on flood prevention and what has it delivered? Some 793 projects with a total spend Rs 2,332 crore for 1,434 km of storm water drains were taken up. The

where-what of their success is as fuzzy as the answer provided in the Lok Sabha. The gap between need and delivery is stark. A 2022 World Bank report estimates that India would need to spend

as much as $840 billion in 15 years on its urban infrastructure to meet the needs of a growing urban population that’s expected to touch 600 million by 2036. The hurdle is not only of

resources—the government’s total expenditure in the decade since 2014 has gone up from Rs 17.94 lakh crore to Rs 50.65 lakh crore, as the GDP more than doubled. The situation is worsened by

a poverty of political intent. The architecture of governance disempowers urban governance. The promise of the 74th Amendment to the Constitution—transfer of funds and functions from the

Centre and states to local governments—was reduced to legalese in over a quarter of a century. Local bodies are colonised by states, just as states are colonised by the Union. Urbanisation

is a proven force-multiplier of employment, incomes and growth. Unfortunately, the architecture of politics, with an inherent bias for freebie-funded votes, has reduced urban India into a

constituency of a lesser god. SHANKKAR AIYAR Author of The Gated Republic, Aadhaar: A Biometric History of India’s 12 Digit Revolution, and Accidental India ([email protected])