
Edvard munch’s love and angst at the british museum | thearticle
- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN
Play all audios:

“One shall no longer paint interiors, people reading and women knitting. They will be people who are alive, who breathe and feel, suffer and love.” With this declaration in 1889 Edvard Munch
performed a radical about-turn, swapping the naturalistic and impressionistic renderings he produced while finding his feet in the first decade of his career for work that became wholly
inspired by and infused with personal longing, anguish and anxiety. He remained true to his word: from this point on his people were indeed alive. However, not of all of them seemed happy to
be so. Many of his subjects are haunted and hounded, brittle or broken. He opened their minds, laid bare their souls and invited the beholder to feel their pain, gauge their torment and
make sense of their dislocation. We do just that at the British Museum’s magnificent exhibition devoted to the experimental prints Munch made during the 1890s and the first decade of the
twentieth century while resident in Oslo (then Kristiania), Paris and Berlin. “Edvard Munch: Love and Angst” contains more of the latter than the former but it is by no means all doom and
gloom. The largest show of his prints in the UK for almost fifty years, the exhibition demonstrates through its many riches how this founding father of Expressionism managed to channel his
emotions and sublimate his experiences to create striking, rule-breaking art which has the power to both entrance and disorientate. The best example is of course Munch’s masterpiece and one
of the most iconic images of modern art. The version on display of _The Scream_ is a rare 1895 lithograph. Some sceptics will feel compelled to write this off in advance as an inferior
monochrome imposter when compared with the more famous and more colourful paint-and-pastel real deals. But it pays to reserve that pre-judgment because this is no pale imitation. For all its
familiarity, despite its recognisability, it assails us afresh. Stare at the wavy lines too long and they become nauseating. Stare at the face too long (taking in the eyes – one pupil
looking straight ahead, the other glancing off to the side) and the perceived trauma acquires a heightened intensity. It was this print which was disseminated widely during Munch’s lifetime
and which established his reputation. It comes with a German inscription – missing in the colour versions – which reinforces the idea that the person in the image is not screaming but rather
reacting to a scream. The translation reads: “I felt a great scream pass through nature.” _The Scream_ may be the crowd-pleasing highlight here, but isolate it from its hype and we find
many other pieces which are if not its equal artistically then at least imbued with a similar dark magic which keep us transfixed. Were it not for its tell-tale title, _Vampire II_ could be
an innocuous print of a woman caressing, or perhaps comforting, her lover. But that title prompts us to dramatically alter those first impressions and re-visualise it as a savage act: she
bearing down on the nape of his neck, the thick strands of her blazing red hair enveloping his head. Munch reprises this motif of hair as a tool of female entrapment in his 1896 woodcut
_Man’s Head in Woman’s Hair_ – only here his pair have been reduced to a pair of disembodied heads. There is another couple in _Consolation_ from 1894, this time with naked bodies. On this
occasion it is he who has his arms around her – unequivocally comforting, not caressing. What snags our attention and sows unease is not her mental state but her physical condition. In
contrast to him and his pallid body, her skin is a shocking, unnatural pink. He is blank, featureless, unscathed; she looks like she has been immersed in boiling water or rubbed raw. Munch
often relied upon symbolic representations of women. For him, women were mysteries. He lost the two most important female figures in his life when he was young: his mother died of
tuberculosis in 1868, as did his sister, aged fifteen, nine years later. His first serious relationship was an affair with a married woman, Milly Thaulow, who later broke his heart and
turned him into a chronic commitment-phobe. A more troubled relationship with Tulla Larsen culminated with a fiery argument and a shooting incident which left Munch with a damaged hand.
After breaking up, Munch split _Self-portrait with Tulla_ in two. One of the few paintings on show, it projects a nightmarish vision. In the foreground are positioned the unhappy couple: she
with colourful hair, a sickly pallor, and the most miserable countenance; he in ruder health but vouchsafing her a disapproving glare. In the background, a demonic figure simultaneously
emerges from and blends into the absinthe-green backwash and views the pair through sightless eyes. Two other self-portraits present Munch in singular ways. _Self-Portrait with Skeleton Arm_
(1895) is a faithful homage to Albrecht Dürer and a disturbing image of an artist who is not all there – his head appears to float free and a limb is stripped of all flesh. Less figurative
and more affecting is the 1930 lithograph _Self-Portrait with a Bottle of Wine_. Munch, a scratchy composite of dark shadows and grey worry lines, sits under a cloud in a near-empty
restaurant, his sole company the bottle before him. His spiralling alcoholism would tip him over the edge and precipitate a mental collapse. Elsewhere we see, and marvel at, Munch’s stage
set designs for Strindberg and Ibsen, along with the painted themes and distilled emotions that make up his celebrated _Frieze of Life_ cycle. Again and again we find ourselves turned into
voyeurs, intruding upon intimate scenes and witnessing full displays of pure, unadulterated feeling. _Inheritance _(1916) depicts a harrowing legacy: a syphilis-ravaged baby – part-Gollum,
part-Roswell alien – lies awkwardly in its devastated mother’s arms; _The Kiss_ (1895) portrays unfettered desire: two naked lovers are locked in a passionate embrace by a window, oblivious
or indifferent to outside observers. In his recent book on Munch’s life and art, _So Much Longing in So Little Space_, Karl Ove Knausgaard describes his compatriot as “a painter of the inner
life, of dream, death.” This exhibition bears this out. Munch plumbs the depths to showcase his subjects’ thoughts and feelings – their love, their angst and their suffering. In doing so,
he provides valuable glimpses of his own bruised heart and beleaguered state of mind. _Edvard Munch: Love and Angst_ is exhibited at the British Museum, London, until July 21. For more
information click here. _Edvard Munch: Love and Angst_ by Giulia Bartrum (ed.), published by Thames & Hudson in collaboration with the British Museum, is out now.