Reader TTS

The Abraham Accords, signed yesterday at the White House by two Gulf states, the US and Israel, are a triumph for two men: Benjamin Netanyahu and Donald Trump. For that reason, many people

in the diplomatic community have dismissed the Accords, which mean that the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain are formally recognising the Jewish state. Hitherto, only two Arab countries,

Egypt and Jordan, have taken this step. Rather than hailing this breakthrough as the prelude to a further normalising of relations between Israel and the Sunni Arab world, critics have

grasped at straws in order to downplay its significance. Opposition figures in the Gulf, usually ignored by the West, are suddenly given a platform to denounce the absolutist ruling families

of the UAE and Bahrain. Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the Islamist President of Turkey, which recognised Israel as long ago as 1949, now sneers at other Muslim states for following the Turkish

example. And of course Iran, the sower of discord across the Middle East, denounces the Accords, named after Abraham, the common ancestor of Jews and Muslims.  Here in Europe, the reaction

has been one of studied indifference. Neither the UK nor the EU has played any part in the negotiations that paved the way for this historic pact. Partly for that reason, they were absent

from the ceremony in Washington. More importantly, however, the Europeans, including the British, have consistently prioritised the so-called Peace Process between Israel and the

Palestinians. They see this new process, which bypasses the fraught question of a two-state solution, as at best a distraction, at worst a betrayal by their American partners. In reality,

the Trump Administration has not ignored the Palestinian problem. Indeed, the President has (for once) put his country’s money where his mouth is, by offering the Palestinians a generous

bribe of $50 billion in exchange for a final settlement with the Israelis. The Trump Peace Plan was immediately rejected by the Palestinian Authority, without even engaging in negotiations.

Hamas, which controls Gaza, restated its standard rejectionist line: “Jerusalem is ours, the land is ours, everything is ours.” Rather than put pressure on the Palestinian leader Mahmoud

Abbas to engage with the US plan, Europe turned a blind eye and continued to bankroll his intransigence. Not surprisingly, Netanyahu has subsequently ignored both international and

Palestinian objections to his foreign policy. He faces both yet another election to end Israel’s political stalemate and a trial on corruption charges that could end his career. The Abraham

Accords crown two decades of his ruthless but pragmatic leadership. The likely consequence of his achievement is that other Muslim states, such as Oman, Morocco and perhaps even Saudi Arabia

will, sooner rather than later, recognise Israel. There is still no love for the Jewish state on the Arab street, but there is a grudging respect for Israeli military prowess. Fear of Iran

and its Shiite proxies, such as the Houthi rebels in Yemen or Hezbollah in Lebanon, now outweighs hostility to Israel. Many people in the Muslim world long ago departed from the official

refusal to acknowledge the Israelis, in favour of the adage: if you can’t beat them, join them. Here in Britain, by contrast, there is a simmering resentment, fuelled by ignorance, towards

Israel. This is typified by a leading article in the_ Times_ today about the Abraham Accords. It does concede that “Mr Trump is holding his head high,” and that “his achievement should not

be underestimated”. This is true: the Accords will help to solidify the Evangelical vote behind the President. Yet this leader also claims that “Israel itself is no closer to reconciling its

conflicting commitments to be a Jewish state and a democratic one while denying the vote to the Palestinians.” There is no contradiction between being a Jewish state and a democratic one.

Uniquely in its region, Israel has managed to remain both from its inception. Democracy there has thrived, as nearly two million Israeli Arabs can testify. Whether Muslims, Druze or

Christians , they have distinct cultural identities and equal rights that are enshrined in law — again, unlike most minorities in the Middle East. Not only can they vote: they are

represented by the Joint List, which is now the largest Opposition party, second only to the Likud in the Knesset. Palestinian Israelis, as many now prefer to call themselves, certainly make

their presence felt in Israel, across the board. It is true, of course, that Palestinians who live under the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank or under Hamas in Gaza are indeed denied

the vote. The last presidential election to be held there was in 2005. Mahmoud Abbas, now 84, has effectively made himself President for life, as did his predecessor Yasser Arafat. The

greatest obstacle to democracy for the Palestinians of the West Bank and Gaza comes not from Israel, but from their own leaders. The patriarch Abraham, whose name means “father of many

nations”, would surely have approved of the Accords named after him. He it was, after all, who made a covenant with God Himself. Now that the descendants of Isaac and Ishmael are at last

burying their differences, it is time for the rest of the world, including Britain, to play our part in a new effort to bring about a comprehensive peace. That includes giving not only the

UAE and Bahrain, but also Trump and Netanyahu their due.