Explained: why did the bar council of india come out in support of justice chandrachud?
- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN
Play all audios:
The complainant said that Justice Chandrachud was disqualified to hear any case which his son was appearing for and also went on to add, “But then also he heard the matter and passed the
order beneficial to his son's client. This is an offence under sections 166, 219, 409, 120(B), 34 & 52, etc., of the Indian Penal Code." Pathan, in his letter, also recommended
Chief Justice UU Lalit not to recommend the name of Justice Chandrachud as his successor.