Reader TTS

Panel will focus on the implications of gene editing in human reproduction and livestock. Access through your institution Buy or subscribe This is a preview of subscription content, access

via your institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your institution Subscribe to this journal Receive 51 print issues and online access $199.00 per year only $3.90 per issue Learn more Buy

this article * Purchase on SpringerLink * Instant access to full article PDF Buy now Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS: *

Log in * Learn about institutional subscriptions * Read our FAQs * Contact customer support REFERENCES * Liang, P. et al. _Protein Cell_ 6, 363-372 (2015). Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references Authors * Heidi Ledford View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar RELATED LINKS RELATED LINKS RELATED LINKS IN NATURE RESEARCH

Should you edit your children’s genes? 2016-Feb-23 Gene-editing summit supports some research in human embryos 2015-Dec-03 UK scientists apply for licence to edit genes in human embryos

2015-Sep-18 Ethics of embryo editing divides scientists 2015-Mar-18 RELATED EXTERNAL LINKS Nuffield Council on Bioethics: Gene editing RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT

THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Ledford, H. UK bioethicists eye designer babies and CRISPR cows. _Nature_ 538, 17 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2016.20713 Download citation *

Published: 30 September 2016 * Issue Date: 06 October 2016 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2016.20713 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read

this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative